Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Key features of anaplastology of auricle for craniofacial microsomia

View through CrossRef
Congenital microtia (partial and total absence of auricle) are symptoms of craniofacial microsomia syndrome. One of the methods for restoring of auricle is anaplastology based on extraoral implants. Purpose of the study is to determine the key features of planning and anaplastology of the auricle in craniofacial mircosomia. Material and methods. The results of examination and treatment wereanalyzed. 111 children with craniofacial microsomia syndrome aged 0—18 years were identified from 2011 to 2022, 40 of examined persons (36%) underwent MSCT. For 12 patients the study was conducted 2 or more times. In the standard software the dimensions of the auricles were measured, as well as the thickness of the temporal bone corresponding the location of the auricle on the healthy side and the ear area on the affected side. Results. Regardless of the age and side of the lesion, even considering the sclerotic type of the structure of the temporal bone on the affected side, its thickness in patients with craniofacial microsomia in front of the pyramid is in most cases insufficient for implantation. The most optimal would-be implantation in the mastoid process, however, the safest area for trepanation and formation of the implant bed is the trepanation triangle. Conclusions. In patients with craniofacial microsomia, structural features of the temporal bone are determined: deformation and thinning of the scales, dystopia of the facial nerve canal, hypoplasia of the auditory ossicles and cochlea, sclerosis of the cells of the mastoid process. These nuances must be considered when planning both aesthetic and functional restoration of the external and middle ear. MSCT is the method of choice in the examination of this group of patients, without which the planning of surgical treatment is not possible.
Title: Key features of anaplastology of auricle for craniofacial microsomia
Description:
Congenital microtia (partial and total absence of auricle) are symptoms of craniofacial microsomia syndrome.
One of the methods for restoring of auricle is anaplastology based on extraoral implants.
Purpose of the study is to determine the key features of planning and anaplastology of the auricle in craniofacial mircosomia.
Material and methods.
The results of examination and treatment wereanalyzed.
111 children with craniofacial microsomia syndrome aged 0—18 years were identified from 2011 to 2022, 40 of examined persons (36%) underwent MSCT.
For 12 patients the study was conducted 2 or more times.
In the standard software the dimensions of the auricles were measured, as well as the thickness of the temporal bone corresponding the location of the auricle on the healthy side and the ear area on the affected side.
Results.
Regardless of the age and side of the lesion, even considering the sclerotic type of the structure of the temporal bone on the affected side, its thickness in patients with craniofacial microsomia in front of the pyramid is in most cases insufficient for implantation.
The most optimal would-be implantation in the mastoid process, however, the safest area for trepanation and formation of the implant bed is the trepanation triangle.
Conclusions.
In patients with craniofacial microsomia, structural features of the temporal bone are determined: deformation and thinning of the scales, dystopia of the facial nerve canal, hypoplasia of the auditory ossicles and cochlea, sclerosis of the cells of the mastoid process.
These nuances must be considered when planning both aesthetic and functional restoration of the external and middle ear.
MSCT is the method of choice in the examination of this group of patients, without which the planning of surgical treatment is not possible.

Related Results

Multidisciplinary Treatment of Hemifacial Microsomia: Several Clinical Cases
Multidisciplinary Treatment of Hemifacial Microsomia: Several Clinical Cases
Hemifacial microsomia is the second most common congenital anomaly of the craniofacial region. Hemifacial microsomia is characterised by unilateral hypoplasia of the ear. Treatment...
ACCESSORY AURICLE AND HEMIFACIAL MICROSOMIA IN A ONE-YEAR-OLD PATIENT: A CASE REPORT WITH SCOPING REVIEW
ACCESSORY AURICLE AND HEMIFACIAL MICROSOMIA IN A ONE-YEAR-OLD PATIENT: A CASE REPORT WITH SCOPING REVIEW
Highlights: Infants with accessory auricles should undergo careful clinical evaluation to determine whether the condition is part of a syndrome or an isolated congenital anomaly. ...
Craniofacial Microsomia: New Updates in Spinal Anomalies
Craniofacial Microsomia: New Updates in Spinal Anomalies
Introduction: Craniofacial microsomia (CFM) involves anomalies of the first and second pharyngeal arches, mainly of the mandible, maxilla, ears, and vertebral spine. Th...
Clinical Craniofacial Science: Reconnecting Perspectives Across Craniofacial Interfaces
Clinical Craniofacial Science: Reconnecting Perspectives Across Craniofacial Interfaces
The craniofacial region represents one of the most anatomically and functionally interconnected areas of the human body. However, despite its inherent continuity, investigation of ...
A Conceptual Thematic Framework of Psychological Adjustment in Caregivers of Children with Craniofacial Microsomia
A Conceptual Thematic Framework of Psychological Adjustment in Caregivers of Children with Craniofacial Microsomia
Objective Children with craniofacial microsomia (CFM) have complex healthcare needs, resulting in evaluations and interventions from infancy onward. Yet, little...

Back to Top