Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Key features of anaplastology of auricle for craniofacial microsomia

View through CrossRef
Congenital microtia (partial and total absence of auricle) are symptoms of craniofacial microsomia syndrome. One of the methods for restoring of auricle is anaplastology based on extraoral implants. Purpose of the study is to determine the key features of planning and anaplastology of the auricle in craniofacial mircosomia. Material and methods. The results of examination and treatment wereanalyzed. 111 children with craniofacial microsomia syndrome aged 0—18 years were identified from 2011 to 2022, 40 of examined persons (36%) underwent MSCT. For 12 patients the study was conducted 2 or more times. In the standard software the dimensions of the auricles were measured, as well as the thickness of the temporal bone corresponding the location of the auricle on the healthy side and the ear area on the affected side. Results. Regardless of the age and side of the lesion, even considering the sclerotic type of the structure of the temporal bone on the affected side, its thickness in patients with craniofacial microsomia in front of the pyramid is in most cases insufficient for implantation. The most optimal would-be implantation in the mastoid process, however, the safest area for trepanation and formation of the implant bed is the trepanation triangle. Conclusions. In patients with craniofacial microsomia, structural features of the temporal bone are determined: deformation and thinning of the scales, dystopia of the facial nerve canal, hypoplasia of the auditory ossicles and cochlea, sclerosis of the cells of the mastoid process. These nuances must be considered when planning both aesthetic and functional restoration of the external and middle ear. MSCT is the method of choice in the examination of this group of patients, without which the planning of surgical treatment is not possible.
Title: Key features of anaplastology of auricle for craniofacial microsomia
Description:
Congenital microtia (partial and total absence of auricle) are symptoms of craniofacial microsomia syndrome.
One of the methods for restoring of auricle is anaplastology based on extraoral implants.
Purpose of the study is to determine the key features of planning and anaplastology of the auricle in craniofacial mircosomia.
Material and methods.
The results of examination and treatment wereanalyzed.
111 children with craniofacial microsomia syndrome aged 0—18 years were identified from 2011 to 2022, 40 of examined persons (36%) underwent MSCT.
For 12 patients the study was conducted 2 or more times.
In the standard software the dimensions of the auricles were measured, as well as the thickness of the temporal bone corresponding the location of the auricle on the healthy side and the ear area on the affected side.
Results.
Regardless of the age and side of the lesion, even considering the sclerotic type of the structure of the temporal bone on the affected side, its thickness in patients with craniofacial microsomia in front of the pyramid is in most cases insufficient for implantation.
The most optimal would-be implantation in the mastoid process, however, the safest area for trepanation and formation of the implant bed is the trepanation triangle.
Conclusions.
In patients with craniofacial microsomia, structural features of the temporal bone are determined: deformation and thinning of the scales, dystopia of the facial nerve canal, hypoplasia of the auditory ossicles and cochlea, sclerosis of the cells of the mastoid process.
These nuances must be considered when planning both aesthetic and functional restoration of the external and middle ear.
MSCT is the method of choice in the examination of this group of patients, without which the planning of surgical treatment is not possible.

Related Results

Multidisciplinary Treatment of Hemifacial Microsomia: Several Clinical Cases
Multidisciplinary Treatment of Hemifacial Microsomia: Several Clinical Cases
Hemifacial microsomia is the second most common congenital anomaly of the craniofacial region. Hemifacial microsomia is characterised by unilateral hypoplasia of the ear. Treatment...
Craniofacial Microsomia: New Updates in Spinal Anomalies
Craniofacial Microsomia: New Updates in Spinal Anomalies
Introduction: Craniofacial microsomia (CFM) involves anomalies of the first and second pharyngeal arches, mainly of the mandible, maxilla, ears, and vertebral spine. Th...
Temporomandibular Joint Conditions in Patients with Craniofacial Microsomia (Literature Review)
Temporomandibular Joint Conditions in Patients with Craniofacial Microsomia (Literature Review)
Syndromes of I and II gill arches called maxillofacial dysostoses are accompanied by damage of temporomandibular joint (TMJ). Craniofacial microsomia is one of the of maxillofacial...
Craniofacial cartilage organoids from human embryonic stem cells via a neural crest cell intermediate
Craniofacial cartilage organoids from human embryonic stem cells via a neural crest cell intermediate
AbstractSevere birth defects or major injuries to the face require surgical reconstruction and rehabilitation. The ability to make bona fide craniofacial cartilage – cartilage of t...
Clinical presentation of hemifacial microsomia in a South African population
Clinical presentation of hemifacial microsomia in a South African population
Background: Hemifacial microsomia (HFM) presentation includes gross distorted ramus, malposition temporomandibular joint, small glenoid fossa, distorted condyle and notch, malforme...
A ROR2 coding variant is associated with craniofacial variation in domestic pigeons
A ROR2 coding variant is associated with craniofacial variation in domestic pigeons
SummaryVertebrate craniofacial morphogenesis is a highly orchestrated process that is directed by evolutionarily conserved developmental pathways 1,2. Within species, canalized dev...

Back to Top