Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Antimicrobial susceptibility of Gram-negative bacteria causing intra-abdominal infections in China: SMART China 2011

View through CrossRef
Background The Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends program monitors the activity of antibiotics against aerobic and facultative Gram-negative bacilli (GNBs) from intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) in patients worldwide. Methods In 2011, 1 929 aerobic and facultative GNBs from 21 hospitals in 16 cities in China were collected. All isolates were tested using a panel of 12 antimicrobial agents, and susceptibility was determined following the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. Results Among the Gram-negative pathogens causing IAIs, Escherichia coli (47.3%) was the most commonly isolated, followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (17.2%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (10.1%), and Acinetobacter baumannii (8.3%). Enterobacteriaceae comprised 78.8% (1521/1929) of the total isolates. Among the antimicrobial agents tested, ertapenem and imipenem were the most active agents against Enterobacteriaceae, with susceptibility rates of 95.1% and 94.4%, followed by amikacin (93.9%) and piperacillin/tazobactam (87.7%). Susceptibility rates of ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, and cefepime against Enterobacteriaceae were 38.3%, 38.3%, 61.1%, and 50.8%, respectively. The leastactive agent against Enterobacteriaceae was ampicillin/sulbactam (25.9%). The extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) rates among E. coli, K. pneumoniae, Klebsiella oxytoca, and Proteus mirabilis were 68.8%, 38.1%, 41.2%, and 57.7%, respectively. Conclusions Enterobacteriaceae were the major pathogens causing IAIs, and the most active agents against the study isolates (including those producing ESBLs) were ertapenem, imipenem, and amikacin. Including the carbapenems, most agents exhibited reduced susceptibility against ESBL-positive and multidrug-resistant isolates.
Title: Antimicrobial susceptibility of Gram-negative bacteria causing intra-abdominal infections in China: SMART China 2011
Description:
Background The Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends program monitors the activity of antibiotics against aerobic and facultative Gram-negative bacilli (GNBs) from intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) in patients worldwide.
Methods In 2011, 1 929 aerobic and facultative GNBs from 21 hospitals in 16 cities in China were collected.
All isolates were tested using a panel of 12 antimicrobial agents, and susceptibility was determined following the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines.
Results Among the Gram-negative pathogens causing IAIs, Escherichia coli (47.
3%) was the most commonly isolated, followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (17.
2%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (10.
1%), and Acinetobacter baumannii (8.
3%).
Enterobacteriaceae comprised 78.
8% (1521/1929) of the total isolates.
Among the antimicrobial agents tested, ertapenem and imipenem were the most active agents against Enterobacteriaceae, with susceptibility rates of 95.
1% and 94.
4%, followed by amikacin (93.
9%) and piperacillin/tazobactam (87.
7%).
Susceptibility rates of ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, and cefepime against Enterobacteriaceae were 38.
3%, 38.
3%, 61.
1%, and 50.
8%, respectively.
The leastactive agent against Enterobacteriaceae was ampicillin/sulbactam (25.
9%).
The extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) rates among E.
coli, K.
pneumoniae, Klebsiella oxytoca, and Proteus mirabilis were 68.
8%, 38.
1%, 41.
2%, and 57.
7%, respectively.
Conclusions Enterobacteriaceae were the major pathogens causing IAIs, and the most active agents against the study isolates (including those producing ESBLs) were ertapenem, imipenem, and amikacin.
Including the carbapenems, most agents exhibited reduced susceptibility against ESBL-positive and multidrug-resistant isolates.

Related Results

Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Abstract Introduction Hospitals are high-risk environments for infections. Despite the global recognition of these pathogens, few studies compare microorganisms from community-acqu...
Effect of Gram-positive bacteria on antibiotic resistance in Gram-negative bacteria
Effect of Gram-positive bacteria on antibiotic resistance in Gram-negative bacteria
Antibiotics are one of the most common treatments for bacterial infections, but the emergence of antibiotic resistance is a major threat to the control of infectious diseases. Many...
Distribution of pathogenic bacteria and antimicrobial sensitivity of eye infections in Suzhou
Distribution of pathogenic bacteria and antimicrobial sensitivity of eye infections in Suzhou
AIM: To investigate the types of bacteria in patients with eye infections in Suzhou and their drug resistance to commonly used antibacterial drugs. METHODS: The clinical data of 15...
Predictors of False-Negative Axillary FNA Among Breast Cancer Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study
Predictors of False-Negative Axillary FNA Among Breast Cancer Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study
Abstract Introduction Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is commonly used to investigate lymphadenopathy of suspected metastatic origin. The current study aims to find the association be...
Intra–abdominal hypertension in critically ill patients after emergency abdominal surgery: incidence, risk factors, and patient outcome
Intra–abdominal hypertension in critically ill patients after emergency abdominal surgery: incidence, risk factors, and patient outcome
Background and Objectives: Intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) is frequently encountered in patients undergoing major emergency abdominal surgery and is associated with adverse outc...
How to Combat Gram-Negative Bacteria Using Antimicrobial Peptides: A Challenge or an Unattainable Goal?
How to Combat Gram-Negative Bacteria Using Antimicrobial Peptides: A Challenge or an Unattainable Goal?
Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) represent a promising and effective alternative for combating pathogens, having some advantages compared to conventional antibiotics. However, AMPs mu...

Back to Top