Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Ecosystem-level Impacts of Chickpea Intercropping and Nutrient Management on Phenology, Land Equivalent Ratio and Microbial Populations
View through CrossRef
A two-year field investigation (2023–2024) was conducted at the Agronomy Research Farm, G.D. Goenka University, Haryana, to evaluate the effects of integrated and sole organic nutrient management on the phenology, productivity, and land-use efficiency of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under different intercropping systems. The experiment was laid out in a split-plot design comprising three nutrient management regimes—sole inorganic (NM₀₀), integrated (50% RDF + 50% vermicompost; NM₀₁), and sole organic (NM₀₂)—and four intercropping combinations: sole chickpea (IC₀₀), chickpea + oats (IC₀₁), chickpea + mustard (IC₀₂), and chickpea + barley (IC₀₃). Results indicated that mustard-based intercropping (IC₀₂) significantly advanced flowering, whereas oats intercropping (IC₀₁) delayed phenological development due to competitive stress. Integrated nutrient management (NM₀₁) enhanced early flowering and improved overall crop performance through balanced nutrient availability and improved soil microbial activity. The highest chickpea equivalent yield (CEY) was recorded in sole chickpea (21.46 q ha⁻¹), followed by IC₀₂ (19.16 q ha⁻¹), while IC₀₃ recorded the lowest yield (9.42 q ha⁻¹). Among nutrient regimes, NM₀₁ achieved the highest CEY (17.64 q ha⁻¹), confirming the synergistic advantage of combining organic and inorganic sources. Land equivalent ratio (LER) was highest under sole chickpea (1.00), with IC₀₂ outperforming cereal-based intercrops. Although nutrient effects on LER were statistically non-significant, the NM₀₁ × IC₀₂ interaction recorded optimal resource utilization. The study concludes that integrating mustard intercropping with balanced nutrient management enhances phenological efficiency, yield stability, and land-use optimization and soil microbial load. These results highlight the potential of integrated organic–inorganic nutrient strategies in developing climate-resilient, resource-efficient, and sustainable chickpea-based cropping systems suitable for semi-arid regions.
Title: Ecosystem-level Impacts of Chickpea Intercropping and Nutrient Management on Phenology, Land Equivalent Ratio and Microbial Populations
Description:
A two-year field investigation (2023–2024) was conducted at the Agronomy Research Farm, G.
D.
Goenka University, Haryana, to evaluate the effects of integrated and sole organic nutrient management on the phenology, productivity, and land-use efficiency of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.
) under different intercropping systems.
The experiment was laid out in a split-plot design comprising three nutrient management regimes—sole inorganic (NM₀₀), integrated (50% RDF + 50% vermicompost; NM₀₁), and sole organic (NM₀₂)—and four intercropping combinations: sole chickpea (IC₀₀), chickpea + oats (IC₀₁), chickpea + mustard (IC₀₂), and chickpea + barley (IC₀₃).
Results indicated that mustard-based intercropping (IC₀₂) significantly advanced flowering, whereas oats intercropping (IC₀₁) delayed phenological development due to competitive stress.
Integrated nutrient management (NM₀₁) enhanced early flowering and improved overall crop performance through balanced nutrient availability and improved soil microbial activity.
The highest chickpea equivalent yield (CEY) was recorded in sole chickpea (21.
46 q ha⁻¹), followed by IC₀₂ (19.
16 q ha⁻¹), while IC₀₃ recorded the lowest yield (9.
42 q ha⁻¹).
Among nutrient regimes, NM₀₁ achieved the highest CEY (17.
64 q ha⁻¹), confirming the synergistic advantage of combining organic and inorganic sources.
Land equivalent ratio (LER) was highest under sole chickpea (1.
00), with IC₀₂ outperforming cereal-based intercrops.
Although nutrient effects on LER were statistically non-significant, the NM₀₁ × IC₀₂ interaction recorded optimal resource utilization.
The study concludes that integrating mustard intercropping with balanced nutrient management enhances phenological efficiency, yield stability, and land-use optimization and soil microbial load.
These results highlight the potential of integrated organic–inorganic nutrient strategies in developing climate-resilient, resource-efficient, and sustainable chickpea-based cropping systems suitable for semi-arid regions.
Related Results
Integrative Physical and Genetic Mapping of the Chickpea Genome for Fine Mapping and Analysis of Agronomic Traits
Integrative Physical and Genetic Mapping of the Chickpea Genome for Fine Mapping and Analysis of Agronomic Traits
Chickpea is the third most important pulse crop in the world and ranks first in the Middle East; however, it has been subjected to only limited research in modern genomics. In the ...
CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF CHICKPEA
CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF CHICKPEA
Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.), one of the oldest cultivated plants, is grown in two main varieties: desi and kabuli. The origin of chickpea is associated with the regions of the so...
Influence of phosphorus fertilization on productivity and biological sustainability of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) + coriander (Coriandrum sativum) intercropping system
Influence of phosphorus fertilization on productivity and biological sustainability of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) + coriander (Coriandrum sativum) intercropping system
A field experiment was conducted during winter (rabi) season of 201213 and 201314 at Norman E. Borlaug Crop Research Centre, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, to assess the productivity and ...
Ecological Evaluation of Intercropping and Organic– Inorganic Nutrient Integration for Sustainable Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Production
Ecological Evaluation of Intercropping and Organic– Inorganic Nutrient Integration for Sustainable Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Production
Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) is a dynamic legume crop for both food and nutritional security; nevertheless, its productivity in India persists low equated to global norms. Traditi...
Effect of row ratio and phosphorus fertilizer in chickpea (Cicer arietinum) and mustard (Brassica juncea) intercropping system
Effect of row ratio and phosphorus fertilizer in chickpea (Cicer arietinum) and mustard (Brassica juncea) intercropping system
A field experiment was conducted during rabi season of 200709 at Hamirpur, Uttar Pradesh to evaluate 5 cropping systems and 4 phosphorus levels in chickpea {Cicer arietinum (L.)} a...
Land, biological and economic evaluation of intercropping systems involving barley (Hordeum vulgare), Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) and chickpea (Cicer arietinum) under different spatial arrangements
Land, biological and economic evaluation of intercropping systems involving barley (Hordeum vulgare), Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) and chickpea (Cicer arietinum) under different spatial arrangements
A field experiment was conducted during the winter (rabi) seasons of 2011–12 and 2012–13 at Hisar, Haryana, in randomized block design with 9 treatments replicated thrice, to evalu...
Population structure and genetic diversity of chickpea germplasms
Population structure and genetic diversity of chickpea germplasms
Abstract
In various leguminous crops, chickpea is the fourth most important legume contributing 3.1% to the total legume production. Grains of chickpea are rich sou...
Performance of Field Pea and Lentil When Intercropped with Faba Bean and Chickpea in the Peace River Region of Alberta, Canada
Performance of Field Pea and Lentil When Intercropped with Faba Bean and Chickpea in the Peace River Region of Alberta, Canada
Research information concerning intercropping legumes with non-legumes for seed production is extensively available, but concerning legume-legume intercropping is from tropical are...

