Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Land, biological and economic evaluation of intercropping systems involving barley (Hordeum vulgare), Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) and chickpea (Cicer arietinum) under different spatial arrangements

View through CrossRef
A field experiment was conducted during the winter (rabi) seasons of 2011–12 and 2012–13 at Hisar, Haryana, in randomized block design with 9 treatments replicated thrice, to evaluate the intercropping of Indian mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj & Cosson] and chickpea (Cicer arietinum) with barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) in re placement series. Results revealed that seed and straw yields of barley was reduced in barley + Indian mustard intercropping system as compared to barley + chickpea because Indian mustard was found to be more competi tive and dominant over barley, as evident from higher partial relative crowding coefficient (RCC), competitive ratio (CR), actual yield loss (AYL) and positive aggresivity (A) values of Indian mustard in all the planting patterns com pared to barley and chickpea. Among the intercropping treatments, barley + Indian mustard (6 : 3) was found most economical and efficient intercropping system with the highest barley-equivalent yield (BEY, 7.93 t/ha), land-use efficiency (LUE, 135%), area-time equivalent ratio (ATER, 1.34), land-equivalent ratio (LER, 1.36), land-euivalent coefficient (LEC, 0.44), crowding coefficient (K, 5.82), actual yield loss (AYL, + 1.10), intercropping advantages in dex (IAI, + 3624.3), monetary advantage index (MAI, + 17,975.4),  income-equivalent ratio (IER, 1.24), system productivity index (SPI, 65.4), relative net returns index (RNRI, 1.27), monetary-equivalent ratio (MER, 1.33), net returns ( 56,321/ha), benefit: cost rato (B:C, 3.41) and profit margin (71%). Among different row patterns, on the basis of total crop-performance ratio (CPR) values, barley intercropped with either of the intercrop at 6:3 row ratio performed better. Hence barley + Indian mustard (6:3) intercropping system can be a best option to get more mon etary returns and resource-use efficiency.
Title: Land, biological and economic evaluation of intercropping systems involving barley (Hordeum vulgare), Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) and chickpea (Cicer arietinum) under different spatial arrangements
Description:
A field experiment was conducted during the winter (rabi) seasons of 2011–12 and 2012–13 at Hisar, Haryana, in randomized block design with 9 treatments replicated thrice, to evaluate the intercropping of Indian mustard [Brassica juncea (L.
) Czernj & Cosson] and chickpea (Cicer arietinum) with barley (Hordeum vulgare L.
) in re placement series.
Results revealed that seed and straw yields of barley was reduced in barley + Indian mustard intercropping system as compared to barley + chickpea because Indian mustard was found to be more competi tive and dominant over barley, as evident from higher partial relative crowding coefficient (RCC), competitive ratio (CR), actual yield loss (AYL) and positive aggresivity (A) values of Indian mustard in all the planting patterns com pared to barley and chickpea.
Among the intercropping treatments, barley + Indian mustard (6 : 3) was found most economical and efficient intercropping system with the highest barley-equivalent yield (BEY, 7.
93 t/ha), land-use efficiency (LUE, 135%), area-time equivalent ratio (ATER, 1.
34), land-equivalent ratio (LER, 1.
36), land-euivalent coefficient (LEC, 0.
44), crowding coefficient (K, 5.
82), actual yield loss (AYL, + 1.
10), intercropping advantages in dex (IAI, + 3624.
3), monetary advantage index (MAI, + 17,975.
4),  income-equivalent ratio (IER, 1.
24), system productivity index (SPI, 65.
4), relative net returns index (RNRI, 1.
27), monetary-equivalent ratio (MER, 1.
33), net returns ( 56,321/ha), benefit: cost rato (B:C, 3.
41) and profit margin (71%).
Among different row patterns, on the basis of total crop-performance ratio (CPR) values, barley intercropped with either of the intercrop at 6:3 row ratio performed better.
Hence barley + Indian mustard (6:3) intercropping system can be a best option to get more mon etary returns and resource-use efficiency.

Related Results

Chickpea-based intercropping systems in Rajasthan's Hadoti region: Productivity and economic viability
Chickpea-based intercropping systems in Rajasthan's Hadoti region: Productivity and economic viability
A study was done to determine the productivity and economic viability of intercropping systems based on chickpea in the Hadoti region of Rajasthan at the Agricultural Research Stat...
Production Potential and Economic Returns of Bed Planted Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) as Influenced by Different Intercropping Systems
Production Potential and Economic Returns of Bed Planted Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) as Influenced by Different Intercropping Systems
Background: Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) is the third most important pulse crop produced after dry bean and peas in the world. Amongst pulses, chickpea is the major crop in India ...
Effect of row ratio and phosphorus fertilizer in chickpea (Cicer arietinum) and mustard (Brassica juncea) intercropping system
Effect of row ratio and phosphorus fertilizer in chickpea (Cicer arietinum) and mustard (Brassica juncea) intercropping system
A field experiment was conducted during rabi season of 200709 at Hamirpur, Uttar Pradesh to evaluate 5 cropping systems and 4 phosphorus levels in chickpea {Cicer arietinum (L.)} a...
Habitat manipulation strategies for sustainable management of mustard aphid
Habitat manipulation strategies for sustainable management of mustard aphid
A field experiment was conducted at Tokowbari Farm, AAU-ZRS, Shillongani, during 2020–21 to 2022–23 to evaluate theeffect of habitat manipulation on the management of mustard aphid...
Ecosystem-level Impacts of Chickpea Intercropping and Nutrient Management on Phenology, Land Equivalent Ratio and Microbial Populations
Ecosystem-level Impacts of Chickpea Intercropping and Nutrient Management on Phenology, Land Equivalent Ratio and Microbial Populations
A two-year field investigation (2023–2024) was conducted at the Agronomy Research Farm, G.D. Goenka University, Haryana, to evaluate the effects of integrated and sole organic nutr...

Back to Top