Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Contempt of Court: A Perversion in Indian Criminal Justice System
View through CrossRef
Contempt of court is any act that disrespects, obstructs or undermines the authority, dignity or functioning of a court, aiming to uphold the administration of justice. Any conduct that has a tendency to interfere with the administration of justice or the due course of judicial proceedings can be prosecuted as criminal contempt. It generally falls into two types: Civil Contempt involves willful disobedience of court orders or breaches of undertakings and Criminal Contempt involves actions like scandalizing the court, prejudicing proceedings or interfering with justice publication or other acts. Punishments can include fines, imprisonment or both and the goal is to maintain public faith in the judiciary. Contempt of court Act protects the authority, dignity and sovereignty of the judges. While faircriticism is allowed, actions that undermine or obstruct justice are punishable. Balancing expression and judicial integrity will strengthen the criminal justice system in the country and will as a result save people’s faith in judiciary, ensuring their independent and fair operation without interference. The judges should care for contempt powers as a weapon of last resort, exercising them with caution and restraint, while ensuring order fulfillment and preventing impediment of justice.
Title: Contempt of Court: A Perversion in Indian Criminal Justice System
Description:
Contempt of court is any act that disrespects, obstructs or undermines the authority, dignity or functioning of a court, aiming to uphold the administration of justice.
Any conduct that has a tendency to interfere with the administration of justice or the due course of judicial proceedings can be prosecuted as criminal contempt.
It generally falls into two types: Civil Contempt involves willful disobedience of court orders or breaches of undertakings and Criminal Contempt involves actions like scandalizing the court, prejudicing proceedings or interfering with justice publication or other acts.
Punishments can include fines, imprisonment or both and the goal is to maintain public faith in the judiciary.
Contempt of court Act protects the authority, dignity and sovereignty of the judges.
While faircriticism is allowed, actions that undermine or obstruct justice are punishable.
Balancing expression and judicial integrity will strengthen the criminal justice system in the country and will as a result save people’s faith in judiciary, ensuring their independent and fair operation without interference.
The judges should care for contempt powers as a weapon of last resort, exercising them with caution and restraint, while ensuring order fulfillment and preventing impediment of justice.
Related Results
Envisioning Originalism Applied to Bioethics Cases
Envisioning Originalism Applied to Bioethics Cases
Photo ID 123697425 © Alexandersikov | Dreamstime.com
Abstract
Originalism is an increasingly prevalent method for interpreting provisions of the US Constitution. It requires strict...
CONTEMPT POWER: A CRITIQUE OF THE SUPREME COURT’S APPROACH IN BANGLADESH
CONTEMPT POWER: A CRITIQUE OF THE SUPREME COURT’S APPROACH IN BANGLADESH
So that the Court may perform its judicial function effectively, it is endowed with, inter alia, the power to punish for contempt of itself. This paper examines the Bangladesh Supr...
Construction of Contempt of Court Regulation in Indonesia
Construction of Contempt of Court Regulation in Indonesia
This study aims to analyze the Reconstruction of Contempt of Court Regulations in Indonesia. Contempt of court is defined as an act of contempt against the judiciary. In Indonesia...
Participation In Crimal Acts According In Islamic Criminal Law
Participation In Crimal Acts According In Islamic Criminal Law
<p>The current Research This research aims to explore the views of Islamic criminal law in relation to the the concept of participation in a criminal offense. The research me...
Przestępca zawodowy
Przestępca zawodowy
The article seeks to sum up all that has been said on the subject of professional criminality in the past half-century. It was never any part of the author’s aim to offer an analy...
Perversion et psychose II (dans « Kant avec Sade » de Jacques Lacan)
Perversion et psychose II (dans « Kant avec Sade » de Jacques Lacan)
Répondre à la question de savoir comment la perversion et la psychose se situent l’une par rapport à l’autre est nécessaire pour éclairer ces deux structures cliniques. Si la perve...
Keadilan Restoratif: Upaya Menemukan Keadilan Substantif?
Keadilan Restoratif: Upaya Menemukan Keadilan Substantif?
Substantive justice is an idea of justice that seeks to present it comprehensively and completely in society. Substantive justice in this case does not only interpret the law as li...
Criminal Justice vs Administrative Justice in Corruption Cases: The Urgency of Criminal Justice Reform in Indonesia
Criminal Justice vs Administrative Justice in Corruption Cases: The Urgency of Criminal Justice Reform in Indonesia
This study seeks to elucidate the conflict between criminal justice and administrative justice (legal dualism) in addressing corruption stemming from the abuse of authority by stat...

