Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Federalism Under Obama
View through CrossRef
This article, prepared for a symposium at the William and Mary Law School on Constitutional Transformations to be published this fall in the William and Mary Law Review, analyzes the status of federalism under the Obama Administration. At first glance, federalism would seem to have fared poorly under the Obama Administration, given that the Administration’s signature achievements to date involve substantial expansions of the federal government’s role. But a careful examination of major measures such as health insurance and financial regulation reform, the stimulus, and preemption initiatives demonstrates that the story of federalism’s fate under the Obama Administration is not so simple. To be sure, these measures entail some preemption and new, sometimes substantial, state burdens. But each also has brought with it significant regulatory and financial opportunities for the states. Rather than assertions of federal power at the expense of the states, the central dynamic evident under the Obama Administration to date is a move towards more active government, at both the national and state level. States are given significant room to shape their participation in the new federal initiatives, as well as enhanced regulatory authority and expanded resources to do so. States that are eager to play a greater regulatory role and support the new federal policies therefore have much to gain. But states that choose to stay on the sidelines face the prospect of direct federal intervention or loss of access to substantial federal funds, and their ability to pursue their preferred regulatory (or deregulatory) strategies may be curtailed. Put differently, federalism under the Obama Administration is federalism in service of progressive policy, not a general devolution of power and resources to the states – but it can be an important form of federalism nonetheless. Equally significant, the experience so far under the Obama Administration highlights the central importance of the administrative sphere to modern day federalism. Moreover, a particularly interesting feature of the Obama Administration initiatives is their use of administrative structures that not only deeply embed the states in federal program implementation, but also give the states a role in setting the content of federal regulatory standards and even overseeing federal agency performance.
Title: Federalism Under Obama
Description:
This article, prepared for a symposium at the William and Mary Law School on Constitutional Transformations to be published this fall in the William and Mary Law Review, analyzes the status of federalism under the Obama Administration.
At first glance, federalism would seem to have fared poorly under the Obama Administration, given that the Administration’s signature achievements to date involve substantial expansions of the federal government’s role.
But a careful examination of major measures such as health insurance and financial regulation reform, the stimulus, and preemption initiatives demonstrates that the story of federalism’s fate under the Obama Administration is not so simple.
To be sure, these measures entail some preemption and new, sometimes substantial, state burdens.
But each also has brought with it significant regulatory and financial opportunities for the states.
Rather than assertions of federal power at the expense of the states, the central dynamic evident under the Obama Administration to date is a move towards more active government, at both the national and state level.
States are given significant room to shape their participation in the new federal initiatives, as well as enhanced regulatory authority and expanded resources to do so.
States that are eager to play a greater regulatory role and support the new federal policies therefore have much to gain.
But states that choose to stay on the sidelines face the prospect of direct federal intervention or loss of access to substantial federal funds, and their ability to pursue their preferred regulatory (or deregulatory) strategies may be curtailed.
Put differently, federalism under the Obama Administration is federalism in service of progressive policy, not a general devolution of power and resources to the states – but it can be an important form of federalism nonetheless.
Equally significant, the experience so far under the Obama Administration highlights the central importance of the administrative sphere to modern day federalism.
Moreover, a particularly interesting feature of the Obama Administration initiatives is their use of administrative structures that not only deeply embed the states in federal program implementation, but also give the states a role in setting the content of federal regulatory standards and even overseeing federal agency performance.
Related Results
Administrative Law as the New Federalism
Administrative Law as the New Federalism
Few doubt the tremendous impact the modern national administrative state has had on our federal system. Yet the relationship between federalism and administrative law remains stra...
Federalism’s Non-Interference Principle
Federalism’s Non-Interference Principle
Regulatory conflicts between governments are an inherent feature of American federalism. It seems obvious that the rules that courts use to adjudicate federalism disputes should be...
Federalism and Subsidiarity: Perspectives from Law
Federalism and Subsidiarity: Perspectives from Law
We live in an Age of Federalism. All over the world nation states are withering away as free trade and defense functions are assumed by transnational entities and as power is devol...
Federalism in the Shadows
Federalism in the Shadows
<p><span>An astonishing amount of government power operates in the shadows, evading scrutiny. From youth detention centers and federal immigration enforcement to local ...
President Barrack Obama Strategic Policy towards Pakistan: An Overview
President Barrack Obama Strategic Policy towards Pakistan: An Overview
The Obama administration after taking the office as the President of the United States of America in 2009, his presidency was prepared and determined to defeat the terrorist and te...
Reconciliatory Federalism
Reconciliatory Federalism
In 2015, Canada saw a Liberal government form under the young and energetic leadership of Justin Trudeau. After a Conservative government under Stephen Harper, Trudeau set out to b...
Federalism and State Restructuring in Africa: A Comparative Analysis of Origins, Rationales, and Challenges
Federalism and State Restructuring in Africa: A Comparative Analysis of Origins, Rationales, and Challenges
Abstract
This article assesses federalism in the five African federations: Ethiopia, Nigeria, Somalia, South Africa, and South Sudan. By using Varieties of Democracy...
Misguided Federalism
Misguided Federalism
The article considers the effect of the Supreme Court's recent federalism decisions - specifically Lopez and Morrison - on the scope of federal criminal law. The Court in Morrison...

