Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The Summary Assessment Hearing
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Once the court has made the costs order, the summary assessment itself can begin. This is the procedure by which the court determines the amount of the costs due from the paying party to the receiving party. This chapter explains the procedure that is adopted at hearings and examines the substantive issues that are most commonly argued at summary assessments. The issues occur in the chapter in the order in which they should be raised at the summary assessment. This chapter does not, however, deal with issues that may arise in relation to the funding of a claim (typically by way of a CFA). As these issues can be complex and as they are not relevant to all summary assessments, they have been addressed separately in Chapter 6. All the parties and the judge should have a copy of all statements of costs before the summary assessment begins. Copies of any other relevant materials prepared in accordance with the preparation checklists in Chapter 9 must also be made available to the opposing party and the judge. Ordinarily the judge will want to hear from the paying party first so that the issues between the parties can be identified. The receiving party will of course be given an opportunity to respond to each of the issues raised. It is up to the judge whether he hears the paying party make submissions in relation to all the points in issue at one go, or whether he requires each issue to be responded to before going onto the next. A summary assessment hearing is, by its very nature, short. Parties must be ready to deal with the issues they wish to raise succinctly. Arguments need to be marshalled into a sensible order and in such a way as to make the best use of the time available. Thus any submissions that go to the overall recovery of costs (such as submissions relating to the solicitor client retainer, or the enforceability of a CFA, proportionality or costs estimates) should be raised first. Next, arguments over the level of fee earner or the hourly rate claimed should be attacked, and then individual items on the bill. The last matter that should be dealt with by the court is the assessment of any uplift claimed by the receiving party.
Title: The Summary Assessment Hearing
Description:
Abstract
Once the court has made the costs order, the summary assessment itself can begin.
This is the procedure by which the court determines the amount of the costs due from the paying party to the receiving party.
This chapter explains the procedure that is adopted at hearings and examines the substantive issues that are most commonly argued at summary assessments.
The issues occur in the chapter in the order in which they should be raised at the summary assessment.
This chapter does not, however, deal with issues that may arise in relation to the funding of a claim (typically by way of a CFA).
As these issues can be complex and as they are not relevant to all summary assessments, they have been addressed separately in Chapter 6.
All the parties and the judge should have a copy of all statements of costs before the summary assessment begins.
Copies of any other relevant materials prepared in accordance with the preparation checklists in Chapter 9 must also be made available to the opposing party and the judge.
Ordinarily the judge will want to hear from the paying party first so that the issues between the parties can be identified.
The receiving party will of course be given an opportunity to respond to each of the issues raised.
It is up to the judge whether he hears the paying party make submissions in relation to all the points in issue at one go, or whether he requires each issue to be responded to before going onto the next.
A summary assessment hearing is, by its very nature, short.
Parties must be ready to deal with the issues they wish to raise succinctly.
Arguments need to be marshalled into a sensible order and in such a way as to make the best use of the time available.
Thus any submissions that go to the overall recovery of costs (such as submissions relating to the solicitor client retainer, or the enforceability of a CFA, proportionality or costs estimates) should be raised first.
Next, arguments over the level of fee earner or the hourly rate claimed should be attacked, and then individual items on the bill.
The last matter that should be dealt with by the court is the assessment of any uplift claimed by the receiving party.
Related Results
Burden of treatment associated with hearing aid use among older adults with hearing loss: a qualitative study
Burden of treatment associated with hearing aid use among older adults with hearing loss: a qualitative study
Abstract
Background
Treatment burden can affect patients’ ability to carry out tasks or follow recommendations from healthcare providers. Evaluating the burden as...
Occupational Noise Exposure and Longitudinal Hearing Changes in Post-9/11 US Military Personnel During an Initial Period of Military Service
Occupational Noise Exposure and Longitudinal Hearing Changes in Post-9/11 US Military Personnel During an Initial Period of Military Service
Objectives:
Auditory impairments, particularly those resulting from hazardous occupational noise exposures, are pressing concerns for the US Departments of Defense (DoD...
Predictors of Self-Reported Hearing Problems Among Commercial Transport Workers Using Personal Listening Devices in Kano State, Nigeria: A Cross-Sectional Study
Predictors of Self-Reported Hearing Problems Among Commercial Transport Workers Using Personal Listening Devices in Kano State, Nigeria: A Cross-Sectional Study
ABSTRACT
Background
Noise-induced hearing loss is one of the most common preventable occupational health problems worldwide. Commercial transport workers are routinely exposed to e...
Pattern of hearing loss among patients visiting ENT OPD at Janaki Medical College: A cross sectional study
Pattern of hearing loss among patients visiting ENT OPD at Janaki Medical College: A cross sectional study
Background and Objectives: To study the pattern of hearing loss among patients visiting ENT OPD in Janaki medical college teaching hospital.Material and Methods: The study was cond...
Introduction To Hearing And Speech Rehabilitation
Introduction To Hearing And Speech Rehabilitation
Rehabilitation of hearing and speech represents a theory that needs to be confirmed, and also the practice, also a process which is in continuous progress. It is simultaneously a s...
Pediatric Hearing Aid Management: Parent-Reported Needs for Learning Support
Pediatric Hearing Aid Management: Parent-Reported Needs for Learning Support
Objectives:
The aim of this study was to investigate parent learning and support needs related to hearing aid management for young children, and factors that influence ...
Hearing Loss in Stroke Cases: A Literature Review
Hearing Loss in Stroke Cases: A Literature Review
Stroke is the most common cause of neurological disability (MacDonald, Cockerell, Sander, & Shorvon, 2000) and about 1 in 3 stroke life survivors are functionally reliant on it...
Analyzing the Relationship Between Real-Ear Measures, the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit, and Hearing Aid Retention
Analyzing the Relationship Between Real-Ear Measures, the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit, and Hearing Aid Retention
Purpose:
Hearing loss is one of the most common chronic conditions in adults aged 65 years or older. Despite the variety of hearing devices and services offered...

