Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Politics in Muslim Countries Today between the Political Philosophies of Imam al-Māwardī, Thomas Hobbes, and John Locke

View through CrossRef
Nothing went wrong in Muslim countries as politics did in recent times. The political leaders of Muslim countries are more inept, incompetent, and hopeless in the contemporary world than at any time in the past. Contemporary Muslim politicians have utterly failed in their local politics as well as in their international politics. There is no law and order in many Muslim countries. People in Muslim countries are oppressed and suppressed more than in many other countries. Corruption, fraud, injustice, and aggression are more widespread in Muslim countries than in many non-Muslim countries. Many Muslim countries have widespread despotism, dictatorship, autocracy, and tyranny. Mismanagement, political malpractice, abuse, and violence are more widespread in many Muslim countries today than in non-Muslim countries. In short, Muslim politicians have utterly failed in their politics today than at any time in the past. They have also utterly failed in their international politics too. Muslim voices are not heard, appreciated, and respected at all in international affairs. Muslim leaders do not have any influence either in international organizations or in regional organizations. The leaders of Muslim countries have been exploited, disappointed, and conned by some western countries. Muslim political leaders are not allowed to challenge or question western leaders in any international affairs, and they have been marginalised systematically and deliberately by western political leaders. Just consider how many times Arab and Muslim leaders have been humiliated, demeaned, and disgraced in international affairs such as Iraq, Syrian Afghanistan and the Palestine problems by some western political leaders.<br> <br>How many times, western leaders have supported the state of Israel in the UN’s resolution against the Palestinians? Almost all Muslim countries are made as western colonies today. Any western country could invade any Muslim country without any approval from Muslim leaders. The natural sources of Muslim countries are exploited by western countries as they like and yet, Muslim leaders are treated very badly by western leaders today than at any time in Muslim history. How did the arts of politics and public administration descend into this level of decay and disintegration? This is despite the fact, that many classical Muslim jurists produced some brilliant political theories, principles, and doctrines long before western political philosophers produced their political ideas. Books and treatises on politics and public administration by Imam al-Māwardī, al-Shaybani, Ibn Taymiyyah and others are par excellent than many western political philosophies and yet, Muslim politicians have utterly failed to apply Islamic political theories in their practical political life. As a result of this, Islamic political ideas are ignored and marginalised. Here I’m trying to compare the political thoughts of Imam al-Māwardī, - with the political philosophies of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke to gauge and evaluate some similarities and dissimilarities between their political concepts and ideas. More importantly to explore why and how Muslim politicians have failed, and western politicians have succeeded? <br>
Title: Politics in Muslim Countries Today between the Political Philosophies of Imam al-Māwardī, Thomas Hobbes, and John Locke
Description:
Nothing went wrong in Muslim countries as politics did in recent times.
The political leaders of Muslim countries are more inept, incompetent, and hopeless in the contemporary world than at any time in the past.
Contemporary Muslim politicians have utterly failed in their local politics as well as in their international politics.
There is no law and order in many Muslim countries.
People in Muslim countries are oppressed and suppressed more than in many other countries.
Corruption, fraud, injustice, and aggression are more widespread in Muslim countries than in many non-Muslim countries.
Many Muslim countries have widespread despotism, dictatorship, autocracy, and tyranny.
Mismanagement, political malpractice, abuse, and violence are more widespread in many Muslim countries today than in non-Muslim countries.
In short, Muslim politicians have utterly failed in their politics today than at any time in the past.
They have also utterly failed in their international politics too.
Muslim voices are not heard, appreciated, and respected at all in international affairs.
Muslim leaders do not have any influence either in international organizations or in regional organizations.
The leaders of Muslim countries have been exploited, disappointed, and conned by some western countries.
Muslim political leaders are not allowed to challenge or question western leaders in any international affairs, and they have been marginalised systematically and deliberately by western political leaders.
Just consider how many times Arab and Muslim leaders have been humiliated, demeaned, and disgraced in international affairs such as Iraq, Syrian Afghanistan and the Palestine problems by some western political leaders.
<br> <br>How many times, western leaders have supported the state of Israel in the UN’s resolution against the Palestinians? Almost all Muslim countries are made as western colonies today.
Any western country could invade any Muslim country without any approval from Muslim leaders.
The natural sources of Muslim countries are exploited by western countries as they like and yet, Muslim leaders are treated very badly by western leaders today than at any time in Muslim history.
How did the arts of politics and public administration descend into this level of decay and disintegration? This is despite the fact, that many classical Muslim jurists produced some brilliant political theories, principles, and doctrines long before western political philosophers produced their political ideas.
Books and treatises on politics and public administration by Imam al-Māwardī, al-Shaybani, Ibn Taymiyyah and others are par excellent than many western political philosophies and yet, Muslim politicians have utterly failed to apply Islamic political theories in their practical political life.
As a result of this, Islamic political ideas are ignored and marginalised.
Here I’m trying to compare the political thoughts of Imam al-Māwardī, - with the political philosophies of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke to gauge and evaluate some similarities and dissimilarities between their political concepts and ideas.
More importantly to explore why and how Muslim politicians have failed, and western politicians have succeeded? <br>.

Related Results

[RETRACTED] Keanu Reeves CBD Gummies v1
[RETRACTED] Keanu Reeves CBD Gummies v1
[RETRACTED]Keanu Reeves CBD Gummies ==❱❱ Huge Discounts:[HURRY UP ] Absolute Keanu Reeves CBD Gummies (Available)Order Online Only!! ❰❰= https://www.facebook.com/Keanu-Reeves-CBD-G...
Telaah Atas Konsep Khilafah Al-Mawardi (Studi Deskriptif Analisis)
Telaah Atas Konsep Khilafah Al-Mawardi (Studi Deskriptif Analisis)
<p><strong>Abstract</strong><strong></strong></p><p>Al-Mawardi was a Muslim scholar who was very well known for his Islamic political theo...
John Locke, William Penn, and the Question of Locke's Pardon
John Locke, William Penn, and the Question of Locke's Pardon
Shortly after Locke’s death, Jean Le Clerc began collecting materials for the short biography he was planning to publish in the periodical he edited, the Bibli...
Women in Australian Politics: Maintaining the Rage against the Political Machine
Women in Australian Politics: Maintaining the Rage against the Political Machine
Women in federal politics are under-represented today and always have been. At no time in the history of the federal parliament have women achieved equal representation with men. T...
İmam Hatip Lisesi Öğrencilerinin İmam Hatip Lisesi, Meslek Dersi Öğretmeni ve İdarecilerine İlişkin Metaforik Algıları
İmam Hatip Lisesi Öğrencilerinin İmam Hatip Lisesi, Meslek Dersi Öğretmeni ve İdarecilerine İlişkin Metaforik Algıları
Bu çalışmanın amacı, İmam Hatip Lisesi öğrencilerinin İmam Hatip Lisesi, İmam Hatip Lisesi meslek dersi öğretmeni ve İmam Hatip Lisesi idaresine ilişkin algılarını metaforlar yoluy...
Hobbes’s Deceiving God: the Correspondence Between Thomas Hobbes and Rene Descartes
Hobbes’s Deceiving God: the Correspondence Between Thomas Hobbes and Rene Descartes
In presenting their correspondence, I highlight the means in which Hobbes is able to divorce nature and politics in his philosophy. This is done by bringing to light Hobbes’s agree...
Locke, John (1632–1704)
Locke, John (1632–1704)
John Locke was the leading English philosopher of the late seventeenth century. His two major works, An Essay concerning Human Understanding and Two Treatises of Government, both p...
Budaya Struktur Pemerintahan Republik Islam Iran
Budaya Struktur Pemerintahan Republik Islam Iran
<p><em>Abstrak</em> - <strong>Kelahiran Republik Islam Iran tidak lepas dari peran Ayatollah Imam Khomeini, pemimpin spiritual ulama, sekaligus pemimpin pol...

Back to Top