Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Comparative Dosimetric Analysis of Tandem-Ovoid and Tandem-Ring Brachytherapy Applicators in Cervical Cancer
View through CrossRef
Brachytherapy plays a vital role in the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer by delivering high radiation doses directly to the tumor while minimizing exposure to surrounding healthy tissues. This retrospective study compared the dosimetric performance of tandem–ovoid (T&O) and tandem–ring (T&R) intracavitary brachytherapy applicators in 60 cervical cancer patients treated at CMH Cancer Center, Dhaka. Patients were divided into two groups according to applicator type, with 30 patients in each arm. Dosimetric parameters including HR-CTV 90% coverage, rectal dose, and bladder dose were analyzed. The average HR-CTV 90% coverage was 106.91% for the tandem–ovoid applicator and 100.43% for the tandem–ring applicator. The average rectal dose was lower in the tandem–ring applicator (4.93 Gy) compared to the tandem–ovoid applicator (5.57 Gy). However, the bladder dose was slightly higher in the tandem–ring applicator (5.31 Gy) than in the tandem–ovoid applicator (5.20 Gy). The findings indicate that both applicators provide clinically acceptable dose distribution, although tandem–ovoid demonstrated comparatively better target coverage while tandem–ring showed improved rectal dose sparing. Applicator selection should therefore be individualized according to treatment priorities and patient anatomy.
Military Institute of Science and Technology (MIST)
Title: Comparative Dosimetric Analysis of Tandem-Ovoid and Tandem-Ring Brachytherapy Applicators in Cervical Cancer
Description:
Brachytherapy plays a vital role in the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer by delivering high radiation doses directly to the tumor while minimizing exposure to surrounding healthy tissues.
This retrospective study compared the dosimetric performance of tandem–ovoid (T&O) and tandem–ring (T&R) intracavitary brachytherapy applicators in 60 cervical cancer patients treated at CMH Cancer Center, Dhaka.
Patients were divided into two groups according to applicator type, with 30 patients in each arm.
Dosimetric parameters including HR-CTV 90% coverage, rectal dose, and bladder dose were analyzed.
The average HR-CTV 90% coverage was 106.
91% for the tandem–ovoid applicator and 100.
43% for the tandem–ring applicator.
The average rectal dose was lower in the tandem–ring applicator (4.
93 Gy) compared to the tandem–ovoid applicator (5.
57 Gy).
However, the bladder dose was slightly higher in the tandem–ring applicator (5.
31 Gy) than in the tandem–ovoid applicator (5.
20 Gy).
The findings indicate that both applicators provide clinically acceptable dose distribution, although tandem–ovoid demonstrated comparatively better target coverage while tandem–ring showed improved rectal dose sparing.
Applicator selection should therefore be individualized according to treatment priorities and patient anatomy.
Related Results
THE DOSIMETRIC COMPARISON BETWEEN TANDEM OVOID AND TANDEM RING APPLICATOR IN CERVICAL CANCER BRACHYTHERAPY
THE DOSIMETRIC COMPARISON BETWEEN TANDEM OVOID AND TANDEM RING APPLICATOR IN CERVICAL CANCER BRACHYTHERAPY
AIM: The present research aims to assess the differences in dosimetry between tandem-ovoid and tandem-ring gynaecologic brachytherapy applicators utilizing diverse optimizing techn...
Cervical cancer screening utilization and predictors among eligible women in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Cervical cancer screening utilization and predictors among eligible women in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
BackgroundDespite a remarkable progress in the reduction of global rate of maternal mortality, cervical cancer has been identified as the leading cause of maternal morbidity and mo...
Comparative Dosimetric Study Using Various Applicators for Vaginal Cuff Brachytherapy; Three Ovoid Technique Proposal
Comparative Dosimetric Study Using Various Applicators for Vaginal Cuff Brachytherapy; Three Ovoid Technique Proposal
Purpose: Vaginal-cuff brachytherapy is the adjuvant treatment in women with intermediate-high risk of endometrial or uterine cervical cancers. The most common applicators are singl...
Nasopharyngeal intracavitary brachytherapy
Nasopharyngeal intracavitary brachytherapy
AbstractBACKGROUNDLocally persistent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) carries an increased risk of local failure if additional treatment is not given. It has been shown that intracav...
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
In a comprehensive and at times critical manner, this volume seeks to shed light on the development of events in Western (i.e., European and North American) comparative literature ...
Uptake and determinants of cervical cancer prevention services among female college students in Kenya: A cross-sectional survey
Uptake and determinants of cervical cancer prevention services among female college students in Kenya: A cross-sectional survey
Abstract
Introduction
Cervical cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in women in low- and middle-income countries. In Ken...
Is Advanced Age a Limiting Factor in the Practice of High Dose Rate Brachytherapy in Patients Treated for Cervical Cancer?
Is Advanced Age a Limiting Factor in the Practice of High Dose Rate Brachytherapy in Patients Treated for Cervical Cancer?
Purpose:
To assess the percentage of elderly patients not receiving brachytherapy in our practice and identify the factors
influencing the decision to forgo this therapeutic modali...
Prostatic artery embolization as a method for prevention of infravesical obstruction after low-dose-rate brachytherapy
Prostatic artery embolization as a method for prevention of infravesical obstruction after low-dose-rate brachytherapy
BACKGROUND: Infravesical obstruction in patients with localized prostate cancer caused by concomitant benign prostatic hyperplasia substantially limits the feasibility of low-dose-...

