Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

‘Volto di Medusa’: Monumentalizing the self in Petrarch'sRerum vulgarium fragmenta

View through CrossRef
Scholarship on Petrarch has generally intepreted the figure of Laura-as-Medusa as a projection of the poet's internal conflict between sacred and profane love. Such a reading takes Medusa as a threat to Petrarch's agency. Yet Petrarch's Laura-Medusa is suggestively figured as only her disembodied head, a weapon ultimately manipulated by Perseus. This reversal of agency has an impact on Petrarch's complicated theory of poetic inspiration, and reaches beyond the relationship between poet and beloved to encompass another fraught paradigm of power: the relationship between poet and patron. By recalling the disembodied head of Medusa in the figure of Laura, and recovering the political symbolism of the appropriation of her petrifying gaze, Petrarch creates a model of poetic agency that he uses to stage his relationship to patronage in the Latin Africa and a poem addressed to his Colonna patrons.
Title: ‘Volto di Medusa’: Monumentalizing the self in Petrarch'sRerum vulgarium fragmenta
Description:
Scholarship on Petrarch has generally intepreted the figure of Laura-as-Medusa as a projection of the poet's internal conflict between sacred and profane love.
Such a reading takes Medusa as a threat to Petrarch's agency.
Yet Petrarch's Laura-Medusa is suggestively figured as only her disembodied head, a weapon ultimately manipulated by Perseus.
This reversal of agency has an impact on Petrarch's complicated theory of poetic inspiration, and reaches beyond the relationship between poet and beloved to encompass another fraught paradigm of power: the relationship between poet and patron.
By recalling the disembodied head of Medusa in the figure of Laura, and recovering the political symbolism of the appropriation of her petrifying gaze, Petrarch creates a model of poetic agency that he uses to stage his relationship to patronage in the Latin Africa and a poem addressed to his Colonna patrons.

Related Results

Medusa Miti Üzerinden Sanatta Yeniden Anlamlandırma ve Yeniden Üretim
Medusa Miti Üzerinden Sanatta Yeniden Anlamlandırma ve Yeniden Üretim
Bu çalışmada Medusa’nın sanat tarihindeki ifade biçimlerinin araştırılması amaçlanmaktadır. Makalenin “Medusa Miti ve Sanat Alanındaki Kullanımları” başlıklı birinci bölümünde Medu...
Rudolph Agricola's Life of Petrarch
Rudolph Agricola's Life of Petrarch
Among the many personal faults with which Petrarch, in his dialogue entitled The Secret or The Soul's Conflict with Passion, let himself be charged by St. Augustine, there was one ...
Secretum meum / Moja tajemnica
Secretum meum / Moja tajemnica
The research project’s aim is to translate Petrarch’s Secretum meum (My Secret Book) into Polish and publish it in an academic edition. This treatise in three books (1347-1353) is ...
Is a Fitbit a Diary? Self-Tracking and Autobiography
Is a Fitbit a Diary? Self-Tracking and Autobiography
Data becomes something of a mirror in which people see themselves reflected. (Sorapure 270)In a 2014 essay for The New Yorker, the humourist David Sedaris recounts an obsession spu...
From Postfeminism to Foucault: The Revival of Medusa in Emma Hamm’s Becoming Medusa
From Postfeminism to Foucault: The Revival of Medusa in Emma Hamm’s Becoming Medusa
This paper examines Hamm's Becoming Medusa (2021) through the lenses of postfeminism and Foucault's theories of power and agency, foregrounding the significance of revisionist rete...
Petrifyin’: Canonical Counter-Discourse in Two Caribbean Women’s Medusa Poems
Petrifyin’: Canonical Counter-Discourse in Two Caribbean Women’s Medusa Poems
This essay utilizes Helen Tiffin’s idea of canonical counter-discourse to read the Medusa poems of Shara McCallum and Dorothea Smartt, two female Caribbean poets. Essentially, cano...

Back to Top