Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Policy Making for Regret-Averse Agents
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Effective policy making for sustainable development requires understanding the behavioral drivers and reactions of adopting innovative sustainable practices and technologies of actors targeted by the policy interventions. When designing policy interventions, it is imperative to take behavioral biases into account. We analyzed how to design a policy that aims to foster the adoption of a sustainable technology by regret-averse decision makers. The sustainable technology, despite being socially welfare enhancing, involves a potentially large income loss in a bad-luck state that deters regret-averse decision makers from adopting it. Using a theoretical approach, we show that without a policy, a large income loss hinders the adoption of the sustainable technology by regret-averse decision makers. A policy that stabilizes the income streams of the adopters can induce regret-averse decision makers to adopt the sustainable technology. Regret aversion of the decision makers increases the cost of the policy. In addition, to induce the adopters to exert costly effort that might or might not result in generating an income, adopters should be compensated for their effort cost. The level of regret aversion, the probability of the bad-luck state happening, and the probability of an adopter generating extra income when exerting extra effort determine the possible policy payments. We conclude that to have regret-averse decision makers adopt a sustainable technology requires a different policy than for economically rational decision makers. Our findings contribute to understanding how to induce regret-averse decision makers to adopt innovative sustainable technologies and how to consider regret aversion in sustainability policies.
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Title: Policy Making for Regret-Averse Agents
Description:
Abstract
Effective policy making for sustainable development requires understanding the behavioral drivers and reactions of adopting innovative sustainable practices and technologies of actors targeted by the policy interventions.
When designing policy interventions, it is imperative to take behavioral biases into account.
We analyzed how to design a policy that aims to foster the adoption of a sustainable technology by regret-averse decision makers.
The sustainable technology, despite being socially welfare enhancing, involves a potentially large income loss in a bad-luck state that deters regret-averse decision makers from adopting it.
Using a theoretical approach, we show that without a policy, a large income loss hinders the adoption of the sustainable technology by regret-averse decision makers.
A policy that stabilizes the income streams of the adopters can induce regret-averse decision makers to adopt the sustainable technology.
Regret aversion of the decision makers increases the cost of the policy.
In addition, to induce the adopters to exert costly effort that might or might not result in generating an income, adopters should be compensated for their effort cost.
The level of regret aversion, the probability of the bad-luck state happening, and the probability of an adopter generating extra income when exerting extra effort determine the possible policy payments.
We conclude that to have regret-averse decision makers adopt a sustainable technology requires a different policy than for economically rational decision makers.
Our findings contribute to understanding how to induce regret-averse decision makers to adopt innovative sustainable technologies and how to consider regret aversion in sustainability policies.
Related Results
Risk- & Regret-Averse Bidders in Sealed-Bid Auctions
Risk- & Regret-Averse Bidders in Sealed-Bid Auctions
Overbidding, bidding more than risk-neutral Bayesian Nash Equilibrium, is a widely observed phenomenon in virtually all experimental auctions. The scholars within the auction liter...
Piece by piece: Collaborative mosaic-making for inclusive policy development
Piece by piece: Collaborative mosaic-making for inclusive policy development
This report sets out the findings from one of four projects commissioned by Wellcome Policy Lab to pilot creative approaches to policy development. In this project, Scientia Script...
Peran Impulsive Behavior dan E-Marketing Exposure Terhadap Post Purchase Regret Saat Berbelanja Online
Peran Impulsive Behavior dan E-Marketing Exposure Terhadap Post Purchase Regret Saat Berbelanja Online
Post purchase regret is of particular concern to companies or sellers because it can be a reason for giving negative reviews of products or stores, not wanting to shop again and ...
Pain and Regret
Pain and Regret
Abstract
The assessment of Regret and Pain of Regret is an important decision focused step in the evaluation of significant go / no go decisions. Regret is the proba...
Advance Selling When Consumers Regret
Advance Selling When Consumers Regret
We characterize the effect of anticipated regret on consumer decisions and on firm profits and policies in an advance selling context where buyers have uncertain valuations. Advanc...
Regret Theory and Risk Attitudes
Regret Theory and Risk Attitudes
We examine risk attitudes under regret theory and derive analytical expressions for two components - the resolution and regret premiums - of the risk premium under regret theory. W...
Parental Decision Regret after Consenting to or Refusing Hypospadias Repair: an Australian Survey
Parental Decision Regret after Consenting to or Refusing Hypospadias Repair: an Australian Survey
Abstract
Background: Parental decision regret in hypospadias surgery is a recognised source of long-lasting psycho-social morbidity. Its reported prevalence is high but unt...
Decision regret after external beam radiotherapy and high dose-rate brachytherapy boost for prostate cancer
Decision regret after external beam radiotherapy and high dose-rate brachytherapy boost for prostate cancer
Abstract
Purpose
Patients with localized prostate cancer have various treatment options. Decision regret from a patient’s...

