Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

A Hitchin Connection for a Large Class of Families of Kähler Structures

View through CrossRef
AbstractThis chapter presents a Hitchin connection constructed in a setting which significantly generalizes the setting covered by the first author, which, in turn, was a generalization of the moduli space covered in the original work on the Hitchin connection. In fact, this construction provides a Hitchin connection which is a partial connection on the space of all compatible complex structures on an arbitrary but fixed prequantizable symplectic manifold which satisfies a certain Fano-type condition. The subspace of the tangent space to the space of compatible complex structures on which the constructed Hitchin connection is defined is of finite codimension if the symplectic manifold is compact. It also proves uniqueness of the Hitchin connection under a further assumption. A number of examples show that this Hitchin connection is defined in a neighbourhood of the natural families of complex structures compatible with the given symplectic form which these spaces admit.
Title: A Hitchin Connection for a Large Class of Families of Kähler Structures
Description:
AbstractThis chapter presents a Hitchin connection constructed in a setting which significantly generalizes the setting covered by the first author, which, in turn, was a generalization of the moduli space covered in the original work on the Hitchin connection.
In fact, this construction provides a Hitchin connection which is a partial connection on the space of all compatible complex structures on an arbitrary but fixed prequantizable symplectic manifold which satisfies a certain Fano-type condition.
The subspace of the tangent space to the space of compatible complex structures on which the constructed Hitchin connection is defined is of finite codimension if the symplectic manifold is compact.
It also proves uniqueness of the Hitchin connection under a further assumption.
A number of examples show that this Hitchin connection is defined in a neighbourhood of the natural families of complex structures compatible with the given symplectic form which these spaces admit.

Related Results

SPECIFICATION FOR TESTING AUTOMOTIVE MINIATURE BULBS
SPECIFICATION FOR TESTING AUTOMOTIVE MINIATURE BULBS
<div class="section abstract"> <div class="htmlview paragraph">The procedures contained in this specification cover the laboratory testing of miniature incandescent b...
Family Pediatrics
Family Pediatrics
ABSTRACT/EXECUTIVE SUMMARYWhy a Task Force on the Family?The practice of pediatrics is unique among medical specialties in many ways, among which is the nearly certain presence of ...
Geometric quantization of the Hitchin system
Geometric quantization of the Hitchin system
This paper is about geometric quantization of the Hitchin system. We quantize a Kahler form on the Hitchin moduli space (which is half the first Kahler form defined by Hitchin) by ...
METALCLAD RIGID AIRSHIP DEVELOPMENT1
METALCLAD RIGID AIRSHIP DEVELOPMENT1
<div class="htmlview paragraph">Several years ago some of the most prominent leaders in automotive industries cooperated to form a purely engineering group that had as its pr...
Fuze Well Mechanical Interface
Fuze Well Mechanical Interface
<div class="section abstract"> <div class="htmlview paragraph">This interface standard applies to fuzes used in airborne weapons that use a 3-Inch Fuze Well. It defin...
Strongly not relatives Kähler manifolds
Strongly not relatives Kähler manifolds
Abstract In this paper we study Kähler manifolds that are strongly not relative to any projective Kähler manifold, i.e. those Kähler manifolds that do not share a K...
Generalized Kähler Metrics from Hamiltonian Deformations
Generalized Kähler Metrics from Hamiltonian Deformations
AbstractThis chapter provides a new characterization of generalized Kähler structures in terms of the corresponding complex Dirac structures. It then gives an alternative proof of ...

Back to Top