Javascript must be enabled to continue!
An Exploration Collective Bargaining Units in the Public Service
View through CrossRef
Bargaining units and rights are the basis for collective bargaining. The aspect of collecting bargaining unit is intimately related to the aspect of bargaining rights and collective bargaining coverage. Workers with bargaining rights might not be included in the available bargaining units. However, employees that are not part of the available bargaining units, with or without negotiating rights; may still be impacted by default extension mechanism through the erga omnes effect (towards all effect). Thus, the primary goal of this study was to explore the current bargaining units and negotiating rights for various groups of public sector employees. It is important for parties to understand the breadth of their negotiating rights and units, as well as the ways in which they can extend them, such as through agency shop agreements and erga omnes processes. The study was premised on the pluralist approach to understand the agreements for bargaining units and rights. The study was qualitative in nature, to gather participants experiences, opinions, knowledge about the phenomenon of interest. Data was collected from a sample of fifteen purposively selected participants from the public service. Thematic analysis through the help of ATLAS. Ti. was used for data analysis. The study found that all public service employees save for the disciplined forces have bargaining rights. It was also discovered that, even though all public servants have these rights, only those in D1 scale are covered by the current bargaining unit. Employees on salary scales E and F are not included in the bargaining unit, because they are classified as management. It was also evident that the workers that are not part of the bargaining units are covered by collective bargaining agreements through default erga omnes effect of collective bargaining agreement. The study therefore recommends clear provisions for bargaining rights and units.
Creative Publishing House
Title: An Exploration Collective Bargaining Units in the Public Service
Description:
Bargaining units and rights are the basis for collective bargaining.
The aspect of collecting bargaining unit is intimately related to the aspect of bargaining rights and collective bargaining coverage.
Workers with bargaining rights might not be included in the available bargaining units.
However, employees that are not part of the available bargaining units, with or without negotiating rights; may still be impacted by default extension mechanism through the erga omnes effect (towards all effect).
Thus, the primary goal of this study was to explore the current bargaining units and negotiating rights for various groups of public sector employees.
It is important for parties to understand the breadth of their negotiating rights and units, as well as the ways in which they can extend them, such as through agency shop agreements and erga omnes processes.
The study was premised on the pluralist approach to understand the agreements for bargaining units and rights.
The study was qualitative in nature, to gather participants experiences, opinions, knowledge about the phenomenon of interest.
Data was collected from a sample of fifteen purposively selected participants from the public service.
Thematic analysis through the help of ATLAS.
Ti.
was used for data analysis.
The study found that all public service employees save for the disciplined forces have bargaining rights.
It was also discovered that, even though all public servants have these rights, only those in D1 scale are covered by the current bargaining unit.
Employees on salary scales E and F are not included in the bargaining unit, because they are classified as management.
It was also evident that the workers that are not part of the bargaining units are covered by collective bargaining agreements through default erga omnes effect of collective bargaining agreement.
The study therefore recommends clear provisions for bargaining rights and units.
Related Results
Testing a Behavioral Theory Model of Labor Negotiations
Testing a Behavioral Theory Model of Labor Negotiations
SummaryThe Behavioral Theory we have developed stands up well and helps us gain a better feeling for the behavioral dynamics of collective bargaining. As expected, economic variabl...
The Paradox of Public Sector Labor Law
The Paradox of Public Sector Labor Law
Although the percentage of employees represented in collective bargaining in the public sector is more than five times the percentage in the private sector, collective bargaining f...
Bargaining solutions in heterogeneous networks: A reinforcement learning‐based approach
Bargaining solutions in heterogeneous networks: A reinforcement learning‐based approach
AbstractTo enhance the performance and the coverage area of the next‐generation heterogeneous wireless networks (HetNets), smaller cells such as femtocells are deployed. A reasonab...
The legal framework for collective bargaining in Nigeria
The legal framework for collective bargaining in Nigeria
The International Labour Organization (ILO) in its Right to Organize and Collective Bargaining Convention No. 98 of 1949 recognized the right to collective bargaining as a core tra...
Asset Confiscation in Corruption Cases through Plea Bargaining System: Should Indonesia Learn From Nigeria?
Asset Confiscation in Corruption Cases through Plea Bargaining System: Should Indonesia Learn From Nigeria?
Plea bargaining system is a procedure of bargaining for punishment between the prosecutor and the suspect or defendant on the basis of an admission of guilt from the latter party. ...
Collective Bargaining and Perceived Fairness: Validating the Conceptual Structure
Collective Bargaining and Perceived Fairness: Validating the Conceptual Structure
The aim of this study is to conceptualize the “perceived fairness in the context of collective bargaining” and empirically validate its internal structure. This concept refe...
Negotiating Beliefs
Negotiating Beliefs
AbstractThis is the first of four chapters on belief democracy, and discusses democratic bargaining in relation to beliefs. Disputes over beliefs sometimes get resolved through per...
TO THE QUESTION OF HENDIADIC PAIR-WORD UNITS REVERSIBILITY IN MODERN ENGLISH
TO THE QUESTION OF HENDIADIC PAIR-WORD UNITS REVERSIBILITY IN MODERN ENGLISH
Problem statement. The article provides an analysis of distinctive features of hendiadic pair-word units reversibility in Modern English. The concept of hendiadys is sufficiently w...

