Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Repairing Broken Relations by Repairing Broken Treaties: Theorizing Post-Colonial States in Settler Colonies

View through CrossRef
This article examines the British colonial theft of Indigenous sovereignty and the particular obstacles that it presents to establishing just social relations between the colonizer and the colonized in settler states. In the first half, I argue that the particular nature of the crime of sovereign theft makes apologies and reparations unsuitable policy tools for reconciliation because Settler societies owe their very existence to the abrogation of Indigenous sovereignties. Instead, Settler states ought to return sovereignty to the land’s Indigenous peoples. In the second half of this paper, I take up some of the practical questions of how this might be done and anticipate a number of objections. Giving up sovereignty would not mean dispossessing the millions of colonists who currently reside in these countries of their homes and property – but it does mean rethinking the constitutional makeup of a country and how that serves to benefit the different peoples who make their homes there.
Brock University Library
Title: Repairing Broken Relations by Repairing Broken Treaties: Theorizing Post-Colonial States in Settler Colonies
Description:
This article examines the British colonial theft of Indigenous sovereignty and the particular obstacles that it presents to establishing just social relations between the colonizer and the colonized in settler states.
In the first half, I argue that the particular nature of the crime of sovereign theft makes apologies and reparations unsuitable policy tools for reconciliation because Settler societies owe their very existence to the abrogation of Indigenous sovereignties.
Instead, Settler states ought to return sovereignty to the land’s Indigenous peoples.
In the second half of this paper, I take up some of the practical questions of how this might be done and anticipate a number of objections.
Giving up sovereignty would not mean dispossessing the millions of colonists who currently reside in these countries of their homes and property – but it does mean rethinking the constitutional makeup of a country and how that serves to benefit the different peoples who make their homes there.

Related Results

Settler Shame: A Critique of the Role of Shame in Settler–Indigenous Relationships in Canada
Settler Shame: A Critique of the Role of Shame in Settler–Indigenous Relationships in Canada
This article both defines and shows the limits of settler shame for achieving decolonialized justice. It discusses the work settler shame does in “healing” the nation and deliverin...
The Day I Was Taken by Pirates and Made to Dance a Jig
The Day I Was Taken by Pirates and Made to Dance a Jig
Employing sensory, visual, and poetic modes of inquiry, this piece explores relationships between pirate lore of Newfoundland, settler colonialism, and embodied experience. Situate...
“In search of our better selves”: Totem Transfer Narratives and Indigenous Futurities
“In search of our better selves”: Totem Transfer Narratives and Indigenous Futurities
Much contemporary science fiction urges us to focus on eco-activism and sustainable futures in order to prevent environmental catastrophe. From a critical Indigenous and anticoloni...
Post/Colonial Bach
Post/Colonial Bach
This chapter contributes a new post-European perspective to Bach studies, re-examining J. S. Bach as a colonial import in Hong Kong in relation to its post/colonial condition acros...
Calling in to Cut back: Settlers learning to listen for a decolonial future
Calling in to Cut back: Settlers learning to listen for a decolonial future
Clearing the gorse, a particularly aggressive invasive plant, so that native plants can flourish has been used as a potent metaphor for decolonization ( Came, 2014 ), and described...

Back to Top