Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Big Boys And Little Boys: Justice And Law In Xenophon’s Cyropaedia and Memorabilia

View through CrossRef
Xenophon’s anecdote concerning the exchange of clothes between a big boy and a little boy in Cyropaedia (1.3.16–18) offers a valuable framework for understanding his conception of justice and the problematics of administering it. Interpreters have erred by assuming that Cyrus’ teacher, as well as Socrates in Memorabilia, simply identifies the just with the lawful. Rather than identifying the two, both characters argue that the law is just; but they differ widely in their explanations of what makes the law just. For Cyrus’ teacher, the obligation to observe the law rests on a universal pre-legal ban on violence; for Socrates statutory law is to be obeyed for utilitarian reasons. Socrates’ view thus justifies both the teacher’s insistence that Cyrus obey the law—since the law is of benefit to the community—and also Cyrus’ decision to violate the law to achieve a just and beneficial redistribution. But it offers no justification for a universal ban on violence. In conformity with the Socratic principle, Cyrus avoids violence as far as possible, but only for the prudential reasons expressed by his mother. Once he acquires the power to coerce, Cyrus uses it to enforce the principle of proportional equality and meritorious redistribution he had approved in his judgment of the actions of the big boy.
Title: Big Boys And Little Boys: Justice And Law In Xenophon’s Cyropaedia and Memorabilia
Description:
Xenophon’s anecdote concerning the exchange of clothes between a big boy and a little boy in Cyropaedia (1.
3.
16–18) offers a valuable framework for understanding his conception of justice and the problematics of administering it.
Interpreters have erred by assuming that Cyrus’ teacher, as well as Socrates in Memorabilia, simply identifies the just with the lawful.
Rather than identifying the two, both characters argue that the law is just; but they differ widely in their explanations of what makes the law just.
For Cyrus’ teacher, the obligation to observe the law rests on a universal pre-legal ban on violence; for Socrates statutory law is to be obeyed for utilitarian reasons.
Socrates’ view thus justifies both the teacher’s insistence that Cyrus obey the law—since the law is of benefit to the community—and also Cyrus’ decision to violate the law to achieve a just and beneficial redistribution.
But it offers no justification for a universal ban on violence.
In conformity with the Socratic principle, Cyrus avoids violence as far as possible, but only for the prudential reasons expressed by his mother.
Once he acquires the power to coerce, Cyrus uses it to enforce the principle of proportional equality and meritorious redistribution he had approved in his judgment of the actions of the big boy.

Related Results

Plenty as a response to austerity? Big Data expertise, cultures and communities
Plenty as a response to austerity? Big Data expertise, cultures and communities
Big Data promises informational abundance – something that might be useful to cultures and communities in times of austerity. However many local organizations lack the skills to de...
The Use of Big Data in Tourism: Current Trends and Directions for Future Research
The Use of Big Data in Tourism: Current Trends and Directions for Future Research
The aim of this research is to examine the new landscape that is taking shape in the tourism economy, due to the adoption of technological innovations. The technologies and systems...
Law's Literature, Law's Body: The Aversion to Linguistic Ambiguity in Law and Literature
Law's Literature, Law's Body: The Aversion to Linguistic Ambiguity in Law and Literature
In any kind of literary analysis, the critic must grapple with linguistic ambiguity, and the law cannot help but operate in a linguistic realm as well. Neither of these claims is t...
Big heroine dramas in contemporary China: Costume, authenticity and an alternative history of women of power
Big heroine dramas in contemporary China: Costume, authenticity and an alternative history of women of power
Big heroine dramas (da nü zhu jü) – a specific category of Chinese costume dramas – have been popular recently, due to the big market of female audiences/consumers in China, and br...
Fighting Fire with Fire
Fighting Fire with Fire
Recent decades have seen an explosion of interest in transitional justice. Although much attention has been directed toward measuring the effects of transitional justice mechanisms...
Affective Equality: Love Matters
Affective Equality: Love Matters
The nurturing that produces love, care, and solidarity constitutes a discrete social system of affective relations. Affective relations are not social derivatives, subordinate to e...
Jurisprudence by Aphorisms: Francis Bacon and the “Uses” of Small Forms
Jurisprudence by Aphorisms: Francis Bacon and the “Uses” of Small Forms
The belief that Francis Bacon was, from the start, a stalwart defender of royal absolutism has prevailed in scholarship despite occasional comments about Bacon’s pluralist or colla...
Equality and Desert
Equality and Desert
Justice is a constant and perpetual will to give every man his due. The principles of law are these: to live virtuously, not to harm others, to give his due to everyone. Jurisprude...

Back to Top