Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Calcium Silicate and Epoxy Sealer in Endodontic Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial Short title: Calcium Silicate and Epoxy Resin Sealers

View through CrossRef
Abstract Background The selection of an appropriate sealer is critical for the success of endodontic treatments. Although calcium silicate-based sealers (CSS) and epoxy resin-based sealers (ERS) have exhibited promise in short-term studies, a comprehensive understanding of their long-term clinical effectiveness in single-visit root canal treatment remains essential. Objectives This study aimed to compare and evaluate the long-term clinical effectiveness of a calcium silicate-based sealer and an epoxy resin-based sealer in the context of single-visit root canal treatment. Materials and methods A prospective, longitudinal clinical trial was conducted involving 42 teeth diagnosed with irreversible pulpitis conditions. The teeth were randomly assigned to two groups based on the obturation sealer used: calcium silicate-based sealer (CSS) and epoxy resin-based sealer (ERS). Postoperative parameters, including pain, swelling, fistula, and sensitivity under biting pressure, were assessed at regular intervals for up to 36 months following the single-visit endodontic treatment. Treatment outcomes were determined based on established criteria, categorizing cases as success, failure, or uncertain. Statistical analysis employed the Chi-squared test, t-test, Mann-Whitney U-test, and Wilcoxon signed-rank test (p < 0.05). Results Preliminary results indicate comparable incidences of postoperative complications between the two groups over the long-term follow-up period. Conclusion This study suggests that both calcium silicate-based and epoxy resin-based sealers demonstrate similar long-term clinical effectiveness in single-visit root canal treatments. These findings offer valuable insights for practitioners aiming to achieve sustained treatment success through sealer selection. Clinical relevance: We can use two types of cement Calcium silicate-based and epoxy resin-based sealersinterchangeably in root canal treatment. ClinicalTrials registration number: NCT05904184
Title: Calcium Silicate and Epoxy Sealer in Endodontic Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial Short title: Calcium Silicate and Epoxy Resin Sealers
Description:
Abstract Background The selection of an appropriate sealer is critical for the success of endodontic treatments.
Although calcium silicate-based sealers (CSS) and epoxy resin-based sealers (ERS) have exhibited promise in short-term studies, a comprehensive understanding of their long-term clinical effectiveness in single-visit root canal treatment remains essential.
Objectives This study aimed to compare and evaluate the long-term clinical effectiveness of a calcium silicate-based sealer and an epoxy resin-based sealer in the context of single-visit root canal treatment.
Materials and methods A prospective, longitudinal clinical trial was conducted involving 42 teeth diagnosed with irreversible pulpitis conditions.
The teeth were randomly assigned to two groups based on the obturation sealer used: calcium silicate-based sealer (CSS) and epoxy resin-based sealer (ERS).
Postoperative parameters, including pain, swelling, fistula, and sensitivity under biting pressure, were assessed at regular intervals for up to 36 months following the single-visit endodontic treatment.
Treatment outcomes were determined based on established criteria, categorizing cases as success, failure, or uncertain.
Statistical analysis employed the Chi-squared test, t-test, Mann-Whitney U-test, and Wilcoxon signed-rank test (p < 0.
05).
Results Preliminary results indicate comparable incidences of postoperative complications between the two groups over the long-term follow-up period.
Conclusion This study suggests that both calcium silicate-based and epoxy resin-based sealers demonstrate similar long-term clinical effectiveness in single-visit root canal treatments.
These findings offer valuable insights for practitioners aiming to achieve sustained treatment success through sealer selection.
Clinical relevance: We can use two types of cement Calcium silicate-based and epoxy resin-based sealersinterchangeably in root canal treatment.
ClinicalTrials registration number: NCT05904184.

Related Results

<b>Comparative Effectiveness of Bioceramic and Resin-Based Sealers in Root Canal Therapy: A Meta-Analysis</b>
<b>Comparative Effectiveness of Bioceramic and Resin-Based Sealers in Root Canal Therapy: A Meta-Analysis</b>
Background: Successful root canal therapy depends on effective disinfection, three-dimensional obturation, and durable sealing of the root canal system to prevent reinfection and s...
Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Ovarian Cancer
Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Ovarian Cancer
Abstract Introduction Although the efficacy of PD-L1 blockade has been evaluated in analyses that combine pharmacologically distinct antibodies, the specific efficacy and safety of...
Clinical utility index for root canal sealers
Clinical utility index for root canal sealers
Abstract Background Effective endodontic treatment requires the use of a root canal sealer with optimal properties to ensure a hermetic seal, preven...
Does the ultrasonic activation of calcium silicate-based sealers affect their physicochemical properties?
Does the ultrasonic activation of calcium silicate-based sealers affect their physicochemical properties?
Abstract Objective Evaluate the influence of ultrasonic activation (UA) on the physicochemical properties of calcium silicate sealers. Methods Nine experimental condition...
Calcium silicate sealers in endodontics
Calcium silicate sealers in endodontics
Introduction: Endodontic root canal sealers serve the purpose of providing a fluid-tight seal, sealing off accessory canals and multiple foramina, while comprehensively confining t...
Effect of Pre-Setting Exposure to 17% EDTA on Physicochemical and Surface Properties of AH Plus Bioceramic and AH Plus Endodontic Sealers
Effect of Pre-Setting Exposure to 17% EDTA on Physicochemical and Surface Properties of AH Plus Bioceramic and AH Plus Endodontic Sealers
Background/Objectives: Residual EDTA may persist after smear-layer removal and after the application of contact sealers during setting. This in vitro study compared the effect of 1...
Human Gingival Fibroblasts Response to Different Endodontic Sealers: An In Vitro Study
Human Gingival Fibroblasts Response to Different Endodontic Sealers: An In Vitro Study
Endodontic treatment aims to eliminate infection of the root canals and fill the dental pulp space. The biocompatibility studies of the sealers used in root canals obturation are c...
Push-out bond strength and fracture modes of MTA and bioactive glass-based sealers using different final irrigants: an in-vitro study
Push-out bond strength and fracture modes of MTA and bioactive glass-based sealers using different final irrigants: an in-vitro study
INTRODUCTION. The bond between gutta-percha and sealer is crucial for successful root canal (RC) filling, requiring sealers with optimal physical, chemical, and biological characte...

Back to Top