Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Studying the Optical 3D Accuracy of Intraoral Scans: An In Vitro Study
View through CrossRef
There are various scanners available in dental practice with various accuracies. The aim of this study was to compare the 3D capturing accuracy of scans obtained from Trios 3 and Dental Wings scanner. A reference mandibular model was printed from FormLab with reference points in three axes (X, Y, and XY and Z). The printed model was scanned 5 times with 3 scans: normal scan by Trios 3 (Trios 3A), high-resolution scan by Trios 3 (Trios 3B), and normal scan by Dental Wings. After scan, the stereolithography (stl) files were generated. Then, the measurements were made from the computer software using Rhinoceros 3D (Rhino, Robert McNeel & Associates for Windows, Washington DC, USA). The measurements made with digital caliper were taken as control. Statistical analysis was done using one-way ANOVA with post hoc using Sheffe (P<0.01). Trios 3 presented higher accuracy than Dental Wings and high resolution showed better results. The Dental Wings showed less accuracy at the measurements >50 mm of length and >30 mm in width. There was no significant difference (P>0.05) of control with the Trios 3A and Trios 3B. Similarly, for the measurements in Z-axis, there was no significant difference of control with each scan (Trios 3A, Trios 3B, and Dental Wings). Accuracy of the scan is affected by the length of the scanning area and scanning pattern. It is less recommended to Dental Wings scan >3-unit prosthesis and that crosses the midline.
Title: Studying the Optical 3D Accuracy of Intraoral Scans: An In Vitro Study
Description:
There are various scanners available in dental practice with various accuracies.
The aim of this study was to compare the 3D capturing accuracy of scans obtained from Trios 3 and Dental Wings scanner.
A reference mandibular model was printed from FormLab with reference points in three axes (X, Y, and XY and Z).
The printed model was scanned 5 times with 3 scans: normal scan by Trios 3 (Trios 3A), high-resolution scan by Trios 3 (Trios 3B), and normal scan by Dental Wings.
After scan, the stereolithography (stl) files were generated.
Then, the measurements were made from the computer software using Rhinoceros 3D (Rhino, Robert McNeel & Associates for Windows, Washington DC, USA).
The measurements made with digital caliper were taken as control.
Statistical analysis was done using one-way ANOVA with post hoc using Sheffe (P<0.
01).
Trios 3 presented higher accuracy than Dental Wings and high resolution showed better results.
The Dental Wings showed less accuracy at the measurements >50 mm of length and >30 mm in width.
There was no significant difference (P>0.
05) of control with the Trios 3A and Trios 3B.
Similarly, for the measurements in Z-axis, there was no significant difference of control with each scan (Trios 3A, Trios 3B, and Dental Wings).
Accuracy of the scan is affected by the length of the scanning area and scanning pattern.
It is less recommended to Dental Wings scan >3-unit prosthesis and that crosses the midline.
Related Results
ADVANCING FORENSIC ODONTOLOGY: UTILIZING INTRAORAL SCANNERS FOR AGE AND SEX DETERMINATION
ADVANCING FORENSIC ODONTOLOGY: UTILIZING INTRAORAL SCANNERS FOR AGE AND SEX DETERMINATION
ABSTRAKLatar Belakang: Odontologi forensik memainkan peran penting dalam identifikasi manusia, terutama dalam memperkirakan usia dan menentukan jenis kelamin. Metode tradisional se...
Assessment of articulation parameters settings repeatability in Avantis 3D software
Assessment of articulation parameters settings repeatability in Avantis 3D software
BACKGROUND: The three-dimensional (3D) space of a virtual articulator requires precise adjustment considering individual parameters for the precision work of orthopedic dentists, o...
Effects of Operator Experience and Scanning Distance on Intraoral Scanner Accuracy
Effects of Operator Experience and Scanning Distance on Intraoral Scanner Accuracy
Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of operator experience and scanning distance on the accuracy of the intraoral scanner in terms of trueness and precision.
Material and ...
Comparative Evaluation of Digital Accuracy Among Three Intraoral Scanners for Posterior Implant and Tooth Scans
Comparative Evaluation of Digital Accuracy Among Three Intraoral Scanners for Posterior Implant and Tooth Scans
Aim: This study evaluates the digital accuracy of posterior implant scans and contralateral molar tooth scans obtained with three different intraoral scanners. Materials and Method...
ACCURACY AND PRECISION OF SIX DIGITAL SCANNERS IN FULL ARCH MAXILLARY SCANS: AN IN VITRO COMPARATIVE STUDY
ACCURACY AND PRECISION OF SIX DIGITAL SCANNERS IN FULL ARCH MAXILLARY SCANS: AN IN VITRO COMPARATIVE STUDY
The objective of this study is to evaluate the accuracy and precision of full arch maxillary digital scans produced by six digital scanners. Materials and Methods: A standard model...
Does Cavity Base Shade of Endocrowns Play a Role in the Accuracy of Intraoral Scans?
Does Cavity Base Shade of Endocrowns Play a Role in the Accuracy of Intraoral Scans?
ABSTRACTObjectivesThe aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of composite resin shades (A1, A2, A3, B1) on the accuracy of scans performed using the Trios 3 (3Shape, D...
<b>An Analysis of an AI Analytical Tool for Predicting Caries Progression from Serial Intraoral Scans in Orthodontic Patients</b>
<b>An Analysis of an AI Analytical Tool for Predicting Caries Progression from Serial Intraoral Scans in Orthodontic Patients</b>
Background: Orthodontic treatment increases the risk of enamel demineralization due to plaque accumulation around fixed appliances, while conventional monitoring methods often fail...
Awareness of intraoral photography among dental students
Awareness of intraoral photography among dental students
Precise shade matching is one of the most testing parts of dental restorations and stylish dentistry. Because of the incredible assortment of regular tooth shading accomplishing a ...

