Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Comparative Analysis of the Implementation of Electronic Money Transfer Levies in Ghana and Nigeria: Policies, Legal Frameworks, and Outcomes

View through CrossRef
This study compares the implementation of electronic transaction taxes (e-levies) in two West African countries: Ghana (Electronic Transfer Levy (E-Levy)), and Nigeria (Electronic Money Transfer Levy (EMTL)). We employ a multifaceted approach to evaluate differences and similarities in design approaches, focusing on fiscal legal frameworks, policy-making and administration, and observable outcomes, including pricing, market development (usage patterns), and tax revenue. Our findings highlight that the e-levies in Ghana and Nigeria differ due to varying political, economic, and legal dynamics associated with each country. Both countries tax electronic transfer values (amounts) above a threshold, but the nature and structure of these levies vary. Ghana applies a new specific 1 per cent tax on electronic transfers exceeding GH₵100 (US$6.82) daily. Nigeria applies a flat fee of NG₦50 (US$0.034) for transactions over NG₦10,000 (US$6.73). Ghana targets domestic electronic money transfers, featuring a broad spectrum of exemptions, while Nigeria focuses on electronic deposits and electronic money transfers, including remittances, excluding intra-bank transactions. Despite initial opposition, Ghana enacted the E-Levy to include informal economy transactions and enhance domestic resource mobilisation. Electronic transactions have surged in Ghana, while Nigeria's market faces infrastructure challenges but shows slow progress. Telecom operators dominate mobile money in Ghana; banks lead in Nigeria due to delayed telecom licensing. Insights into revenue allocation indicate differing intentions. At the same time, both e-levies contribute a maximum of 2 per cent to overall tax revenue – Ghana aims for road infrastructure, and Nigeria intends to fund social amenities, though evidence is scarce.
Title: Comparative Analysis of the Implementation of Electronic Money Transfer Levies in Ghana and Nigeria: Policies, Legal Frameworks, and Outcomes
Description:
This study compares the implementation of electronic transaction taxes (e-levies) in two West African countries: Ghana (Electronic Transfer Levy (E-Levy)), and Nigeria (Electronic Money Transfer Levy (EMTL)).
We employ a multifaceted approach to evaluate differences and similarities in design approaches, focusing on fiscal legal frameworks, policy-making and administration, and observable outcomes, including pricing, market development (usage patterns), and tax revenue.
Our findings highlight that the e-levies in Ghana and Nigeria differ due to varying political, economic, and legal dynamics associated with each country.
Both countries tax electronic transfer values (amounts) above a threshold, but the nature and structure of these levies vary.
Ghana applies a new specific 1 per cent tax on electronic transfers exceeding GH₵100 (US$6.
82) daily.
Nigeria applies a flat fee of NG₦50 (US$0.
034) for transactions over NG₦10,000 (US$6.
73).
Ghana targets domestic electronic money transfers, featuring a broad spectrum of exemptions, while Nigeria focuses on electronic deposits and electronic money transfers, including remittances, excluding intra-bank transactions.
Despite initial opposition, Ghana enacted the E-Levy to include informal economy transactions and enhance domestic resource mobilisation.
Electronic transactions have surged in Ghana, while Nigeria's market faces infrastructure challenges but shows slow progress.
Telecom operators dominate mobile money in Ghana; banks lead in Nigeria due to delayed telecom licensing.
Insights into revenue allocation indicate differing intentions.
At the same time, both e-levies contribute a maximum of 2 per cent to overall tax revenue – Ghana aims for road infrastructure, and Nigeria intends to fund social amenities, though evidence is scarce.

Related Results

Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
In a comprehensive and at times critical manner, this volume seeks to shed light on the development of events in Western (i.e., European and North American) comparative literature ...
Deconstructing the Barriers to ASRH in Contemporary Ghana
Deconstructing the Barriers to ASRH in Contemporary Ghana
Adolescent Sexual Reproductive Health (ASRH) is crucial for the physical, emotional, and social well-being of adolescents. The paper aims to identify the barriers to ASRH in Ghana ...
Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Praktik Pungutan Liar (Pungli) Dalam Penerbitan Kendaraan Bermotor
Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Praktik Pungutan Liar (Pungli) Dalam Penerbitan Kendaraan Bermotor
Introduction: Illegal levies (extortion) is an illegal practice in which officers collect money or other rewards illegally or violate the rules for an interest. This shows that ext...
TINJAUAN HUKUM ISLAM TERHADAP PENGGUNAAN E-MONEY PADA BANK MANDIRI CABANG BULUKUMBA
TINJAUAN HUKUM ISLAM TERHADAP PENGGUNAAN E-MONEY PADA BANK MANDIRI CABANG BULUKUMBA
Abstrak E-Money atau Uang elektronik didefenisikan sebagai alat pembayaran dalam bentuk uang elektronik dimana nilai uangnya disimpan dalam media elektronik tertentu. Pokok masala...
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere is a monograph that argues for a fundamental reorientation of constitutional law around the realities of biospheric interdep...
The relationship between money supply and inflation: analysis with PANELVAR approach
The relationship between money supply and inflation: analysis with PANELVAR approach
Purpose- Central banks serve as institutions responsible for executing monetary policy in countries, with the primary objective of managing the money supply and ensuring price stab...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash Abstract This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...

Back to Top