Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

SOCIO-CULTURAL VARIANCE IN TRANSLATION: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF BULLEH SHAH’S MYSTICAL POETRY

View through CrossRef
Poetry in general, and mystic poetry in particular, poses a multitude of problems for the translator. This study aims to do a comparative analysis of two English translations of five poems by Bulleh Shah, done by two different translators who have vastly different socio-cultural backgrounds. The English translations of Kartar Singh Duggal a post-colonial native Punjabi speaker and Reynold A. Nicholson a colonial non-native speaker, are compared through translation theories of Eugene Nida (1975) and Christian Nord (2018). The formal as well dynamic equivalence revealed that Duggal has done sense-for-sense translation, whereas Nicholson translated word-for-word by keeping in mind the target audience. Though it has fiddled the original mystic meaning of the poems, both translators have adapted the translation according to their socio-cultural settings. Nicholson’s loyalty to ST as well as to TT is clearer than Duggal. Findings of this study hold implications for new translators and researchers attempting to evaluate translations of mystic poetry.
Title: SOCIO-CULTURAL VARIANCE IN TRANSLATION: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF BULLEH SHAH’S MYSTICAL POETRY
Description:
Poetry in general, and mystic poetry in particular, poses a multitude of problems for the translator.
This study aims to do a comparative analysis of two English translations of five poems by Bulleh Shah, done by two different translators who have vastly different socio-cultural backgrounds.
The English translations of Kartar Singh Duggal a post-colonial native Punjabi speaker and Reynold A.
Nicholson a colonial non-native speaker, are compared through translation theories of Eugene Nida (1975) and Christian Nord (2018).
The formal as well dynamic equivalence revealed that Duggal has done sense-for-sense translation, whereas Nicholson translated word-for-word by keeping in mind the target audience.
Though it has fiddled the original mystic meaning of the poems, both translators have adapted the translation according to their socio-cultural settings.
Nicholson’s loyalty to ST as well as to TT is clearer than Duggal.
Findings of this study hold implications for new translators and researchers attempting to evaluate translations of mystic poetry.

Related Results

Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
In a comprehensive and at times critical manner, this volume seeks to shed light on the development of events in Western (i.e., European and North American) comparative literature ...
Tekstualni subjekt u poeziji Marije Stepanove od 2001. do 2017. godine
Tekstualni subjekt u poeziji Marije Stepanove od 2001. do 2017. godine
Maria Stepanova (b. 1972) is a contemporary Russian poet who has emerged in recent decades as one of the most original and complex voices on the poetically highly heterogeneous and...
Tracing the Loss and Gain of Originality in Bulleh Shah’s Translated Poem “Ranjha Ranjha Kardi” By Parvez Iqbal Anjum
Tracing the Loss and Gain of Originality in Bulleh Shah’s Translated Poem “Ranjha Ranjha Kardi” By Parvez Iqbal Anjum
This article tends to examine the complex interchange between originality and the translation in Parvez Iqbal Anjum’s execution of Bulleh Shah’s poem, “Ranjha Ranjha Kardi”. Throug...
EVOLUTIONARY EMERGENT SELF IN THE POETRY OF BULLEH SHAH
EVOLUTIONARY EMERGENT SELF IN THE POETRY OF BULLEH SHAH
This paper affirms the significance of mystic love as a higher mental faculty in human evolutionary process. Man as evolutionary emergent self is the operational definition of myst...
SPECIFIC TRAITS OF HUNGARIAN-UKRAINIAN POETRY TRANSLATION (BASED ON YURII SHKROBYNETS’ TRANSLATIONS)
SPECIFIC TRAITS OF HUNGARIAN-UKRAINIAN POETRY TRANSLATION (BASED ON YURII SHKROBYNETS’ TRANSLATIONS)
The article addresses matters related to the peculiarities of Hungarian-Ukrainian poetic translation. It was noted that the quality, complexity and overall mastery of literary tran...
Translation
Translation
The theoretical, empirical, and pedagogic study of translation is the concern of the interdisciplinary and international field of scholarship known, since 1972, as translation stud...
Cultranslatology in China
Cultranslatology in China
Culture has long been noticed in translation practice, and theoretical research on translation and culture has a history of over 40 years. Unlike the cultural schools of translatio...
The Translation Brief as a Tool of Communication among the Participants of the Translation Process
The Translation Brief as a Tool of Communication among the Participants of the Translation Process
The present research focuses on theoretical and practical aspects of the translation brief viewed as a tool of communication among the participants of the translation process. A re...

Back to Top