Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The Judicial Genealogy (and Mythology) of John Roberts: Clerkships from Gray to Brandeis to Friendly to Roberts

View through CrossRef
During his Supreme Court nomination hearings, John Roberts idealized and mythologized the first judge he clerked for, Second Circuit Judge Henry Friendly, as the sophisticated judge-as-umpire. Thus far on the Court, Roberts has found it difficult to live up to his Friendly ideal, particularly in several high-profile cases. This Article addresses the influence of Friendly on Roberts and judges on law clerks by examining the roots of Roberts's distinguished yet unrecognized lineage of former clerks: Louis Brandeis's clerkship with Horace Gray, Friendly's clerkship with Brandeis, and Roberts's clerkships with Friendly and Rehnquist. Labeling this lineage a judicial genealogy, this Article reorients clerkship scholarship away from clerks' influences on judges to judges' influences on clerks. It also shows how Brandeis, Friendly, and Roberts were influenced by their clerkship experiences and how they idealized their judges. By laying the clerkship experiences and career paths of Brandeis, Friendly, and Roberts side-by-side in detailed primary source accounts, this Article argues that judicial influence on clerks is more professional than ideological and that the idealization of judges and emergence of clerkships as must-have credentials contribute to a culture of judicial supremacy.
Elsevier BV
Title: The Judicial Genealogy (and Mythology) of John Roberts: Clerkships from Gray to Brandeis to Friendly to Roberts
Description:
During his Supreme Court nomination hearings, John Roberts idealized and mythologized the first judge he clerked for, Second Circuit Judge Henry Friendly, as the sophisticated judge-as-umpire.
Thus far on the Court, Roberts has found it difficult to live up to his Friendly ideal, particularly in several high-profile cases.
This Article addresses the influence of Friendly on Roberts and judges on law clerks by examining the roots of Roberts's distinguished yet unrecognized lineage of former clerks: Louis Brandeis's clerkship with Horace Gray, Friendly's clerkship with Brandeis, and Roberts's clerkships with Friendly and Rehnquist.
Labeling this lineage a judicial genealogy, this Article reorients clerkship scholarship away from clerks' influences on judges to judges' influences on clerks.
It also shows how Brandeis, Friendly, and Roberts were influenced by their clerkship experiences and how they idealized their judges.
By laying the clerkship experiences and career paths of Brandeis, Friendly, and Roberts side-by-side in detailed primary source accounts, this Article argues that judicial influence on clerks is more professional than ideological and that the idealization of judges and emergence of clerkships as must-have credentials contribute to a culture of judicial supremacy.

Related Results

The Role of the Judiciary in Constitutional Interpretation in Pakistan
The Role of the Judiciary in Constitutional Interpretation in Pakistan
This study examines the evolving role of the judiciary in Pakistan in interpreting the Constitution, exploring how the courts have come to terms with their position as the primary ...
A Pilot Study of Team-based Learning in Paediatric Clerkships
A Pilot Study of Team-based Learning in Paediatric Clerkships
Abstract Background: Team-based learning (TBL) is widely used in health profession education. However, the use of TBL in paediatric clerkships is rare. In this study, we ex...
A Pilot Study of Team-based Learning in Paediatric Clerkships
A Pilot Study of Team-based Learning in Paediatric Clerkships
Abstract Background: Team-based learning (TBL) is widely used in health profession education. However, the use of TBL in paediatric clerkships is rare. In this study, we ex...
Judicial Review Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi: Judicial Activism vs. Judicial Restraint dalam Perspektif Kebebasan Kehakiman
Judicial Review Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi: Judicial Activism vs. Judicial Restraint dalam Perspektif Kebebasan Kehakiman
The discourse between the application of judicial activism or judicial restraint has become a hot issue of judicial review authority where recently the Constitutional Court through...
Strategies From 11 U.S. Medical Schools for Integrating Basic Science Into Core Clerkships
Strategies From 11 U.S. Medical Schools for Integrating Basic Science Into Core Clerkships
Calls for curricular reform in medical schools and enhanced integration of basic and clinical science have resulted in a shift toward preclerkship curricula that enhance the clinic...
History, Kinship, Identity, and Technology: Toward Answering the Question “What Is (Family) Genealogy?”
History, Kinship, Identity, and Technology: Toward Answering the Question “What Is (Family) Genealogy?”
The article attempts to move beyond cursory definitions to explore the fundamental core and practice of genealogy. Some genealogical writers think that it is history or a subset of...
The term «neo-mythology» in the foreign humanities discourse of the XX-XXI centuries: the specifics of its existence
The term «neo-mythology» in the foreign humanities discourse of the XX-XXI centuries: the specifics of its existence
The article is devoted to the specifics of existence of the term «neo-mythology» in the foreign humanities discourse of the XX-XXI centuries. The foreign texts, which contain the t...
Judicial Review in Nepal
Judicial Review in Nepal
Judicial Review of Laws and Administrative decisions in question is an integral exercise of democratic practice. As one of the organs of the government Judiciary should not only vi...

Back to Top