Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Success Rates of Zygomatic Implants for the Rehabilitation of Severely Atrophic Maxilla: A Systematic Review

View through CrossRef
Zygomatic implants are a treatment solution for patients with severe maxillary atrophy. This treatment option allows delivering immediate fixed teeth within 24 h. Numerous peer-reviewed publications have reported different success rates, resulting in a disagreement on the topic. Therefore, the overall efficacy and predictability of this rehabilitation is still a matter of discussion. With this study, we aimed to identify the published literature on the use of zygomatic implants for the reconstruction of the severely atrophic maxilla and report the cumulative success rate (CSR) as a function of follow-up time. A systematic review of the literature on zygomatic implant for the treatment of severe maxillary atrophy was performed and 196 publications were included in the study. The cumulative success rate of zygomatic implants for the treatment of severe maxillary atrophy was 98.5% at less than 1 year, 97.5% between 1 and 3 years, 96.8% between 3 and 5 years and 96.1% after more than 5 years. The most commonly reported complications were soft tissue dehiscence, rhinosinusitis and prosthetic failures. The treatment of severe lack of bone in the upper maxilla with zygomatic implants is a safe procedure, reaching a cumulative success rate of 96.1% after more than 5 years.
Title: Success Rates of Zygomatic Implants for the Rehabilitation of Severely Atrophic Maxilla: A Systematic Review
Description:
Zygomatic implants are a treatment solution for patients with severe maxillary atrophy.
This treatment option allows delivering immediate fixed teeth within 24 h.
Numerous peer-reviewed publications have reported different success rates, resulting in a disagreement on the topic.
Therefore, the overall efficacy and predictability of this rehabilitation is still a matter of discussion.
With this study, we aimed to identify the published literature on the use of zygomatic implants for the reconstruction of the severely atrophic maxilla and report the cumulative success rate (CSR) as a function of follow-up time.
A systematic review of the literature on zygomatic implant for the treatment of severe maxillary atrophy was performed and 196 publications were included in the study.
The cumulative success rate of zygomatic implants for the treatment of severe maxillary atrophy was 98.
5% at less than 1 year, 97.
5% between 1 and 3 years, 96.
8% between 3 and 5 years and 96.
1% after more than 5 years.
The most commonly reported complications were soft tissue dehiscence, rhinosinusitis and prosthetic failures.
The treatment of severe lack of bone in the upper maxilla with zygomatic implants is a safe procedure, reaching a cumulative success rate of 96.
1% after more than 5 years.

Related Results

The success rate of zygomatic implant in oro-facial reconstructive surgery: A systematic review
The success rate of zygomatic implant in oro-facial reconstructive surgery: A systematic review
Dental implants are widely used in oro-facial rehabilitation. They are considered effective and acceptable in the replacement of lost teeth and, with implant-supported prosthesis, ...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical activi...
Periorbital infection and fistula after placement of zygomatic implants: a case report and review
Periorbital infection and fistula after placement of zygomatic implants: a case report and review
Zygomatic implants are a good alternative to severely atrophic maxilla prosthetic treatment, but complications can result from their placement. Skin fistulas are extremely rare com...
<b>Accuracy and Clinical Pitfalls of Cone-Beam CT for Planning Zygomatic Implant Placement: A Systematic Review</b>
<b>Accuracy and Clinical Pitfalls of Cone-Beam CT for Planning Zygomatic Implant Placement: A Systematic Review</b>
Background: Zygomatic implants have become an important treatment option for the rehabilitation of patients with severely atrophic maxillae, offering an alternative to extensive bo...
Survival and complication rate of zygomatic implants: a systematic review
Survival and complication rate of zygomatic implants: a systematic review
Aim :  To evaluate the available literature reporting the survival and complication rate of zygomatic implants, assessing factors (such as surgical technique, surgical/restorative ...
Short versus standard implants at sinus augmented sites: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Short versus standard implants at sinus augmented sites: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract Background Short implants are proposed as a less invasive alternative with fewer complications than standard implants in combination with s...
Clinical outcomes of zirconia implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Clinical outcomes of zirconia implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract Purpose To assess the clinical outcomes of zirconia dental implants based on an updated systematic literature review. ...

Back to Top