Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The success rate of zygomatic implant in oro-facial reconstructive surgery: A systematic review
View through CrossRef
Dental implants are widely used in oro-facial rehabilitation. They are considered effective and acceptable in the replacement of lost teeth and, with implant-supported prosthesis, oro-facial soft and hard tissues configuration. A zygomatic implant is a class of dental implant, which is different from the conventional one, mainly, because it is much longer and attached to the zygomatic bone instead of the maxillary bone. This systematic review was aimed at describing the success rate of the zygomatic implant in oro-facial reconstructive surgery. A review of published literature with no time limitation was conducted in November 2019. An electronic search of PubMed, ISI Web of Science, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases was conducted to obtain information for this review. A total of 52 prospective and retrospective studies that contained relevant information were selected for data extraction and analysis. Based on the information obtained from the included articles, a total of 3613 zygomatic implants were placed in 1679 study participants. This translates to 2.2 implants being placed per single cohort. After an average follow-up period of 3.5 years, 2.4% of the implants were reported to have failed. Consequently, the success rate of the zygomatic implant was 97.6%. This review has indicated that the zygomatic implant technique is predictable with a high success rate and satisfactory clinical outcomes. Despite the high success rate indicated in this study, conducting randomized controlled/clinical trials to test the efficacy of this implant in comparison with the other technique to treat similar deficits in the oro-facial region (bone grafting) is crucial. Thus, the findings reported in this review must be interpreted with considerable caution. Moreover, more studies with longer follow-up periods involving an adequate number of zygomatic implants placement are imperative. These will help to procure a better understanding of the success rate of zygomatic implants.
Title: The success rate of zygomatic implant in oro-facial reconstructive surgery: A systematic review
Description:
Dental implants are widely used in oro-facial rehabilitation.
They are considered effective and acceptable in the replacement of lost teeth and, with implant-supported prosthesis, oro-facial soft and hard tissues configuration.
A zygomatic implant is a class of dental implant, which is different from the conventional one, mainly, because it is much longer and attached to the zygomatic bone instead of the maxillary bone.
This systematic review was aimed at describing the success rate of the zygomatic implant in oro-facial reconstructive surgery.
A review of published literature with no time limitation was conducted in November 2019.
An electronic search of PubMed, ISI Web of Science, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases was conducted to obtain information for this review.
A total of 52 prospective and retrospective studies that contained relevant information were selected for data extraction and analysis.
Based on the information obtained from the included articles, a total of 3613 zygomatic implants were placed in 1679 study participants.
This translates to 2.
2 implants being placed per single cohort.
After an average follow-up period of 3.
5 years, 2.
4% of the implants were reported to have failed.
Consequently, the success rate of the zygomatic implant was 97.
6%.
This review has indicated that the zygomatic implant technique is predictable with a high success rate and satisfactory clinical outcomes.
Despite the high success rate indicated in this study, conducting randomized controlled/clinical trials to test the efficacy of this implant in comparison with the other technique to treat similar deficits in the oro-facial region (bone grafting) is crucial.
Thus, the findings reported in this review must be interpreted with considerable caution.
Moreover, more studies with longer follow-up periods involving an adequate number of zygomatic implants placement are imperative.
These will help to procure a better understanding of the success rate of zygomatic implants.
Related Results
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical activi...
<b>Accuracy and Clinical Pitfalls of Cone-Beam CT for Planning Zygomatic Implant Placement: A Systematic Review</b>
<b>Accuracy and Clinical Pitfalls of Cone-Beam CT for Planning Zygomatic Implant Placement: A Systematic Review</b>
Background: Zygomatic implants have become an important treatment option for the rehabilitation of patients with severely atrophic maxillae, offering an alternative to extensive bo...
Soft tissue reconstructive techniques at implant sites
Soft tissue reconstructive techniques at implant sites
Dental implants have shown to be a reliable tool for single, multiple and full-arch rehabilitations 1. Dental implants have a very high success rate in terms of osseointegration, h...
Periorbital infection and fistula after placement of zygomatic implants: a case report and review
Periorbital infection and fistula after placement of zygomatic implants: a case report and review
Zygomatic implants are a good alternative to severely atrophic maxilla prosthetic treatment, but complications can result from their placement. Skin fistulas are extremely rare com...
Peri-implantitis: risk factors and outcome of reconstructive therapy
Peri-implantitis: risk factors and outcome of reconstructive therapy
This thesis is focused on (I) the outcome of reconstructive treatment of peri-implant defects and (II) risk factors for the development of peri-implantitis. Background An increas...
Survival and complication rate of zygomatic implants: a systematic review
Survival and complication rate of zygomatic implants: a systematic review
Aim : To evaluate the available literature reporting the survival and complication rate of zygomatic implants, assessing factors (such as surgical technique, surgical/restorative ...
Implant‐Abutment Interface: Biomechanical Study of Flat Top versus Conical
Implant‐Abutment Interface: Biomechanical Study of Flat Top versus Conical
ABSTRACT Background: Overloading has been identified as a primary factor behind dental implant failure. The peak bone stresses normally appear in the marginal bone. The anchorage s...
Long-term clinical outcomes of immediate loading versus nonimmediate loading in single-implant restorations: An umbrella review
Long-term clinical outcomes of immediate loading versus nonimmediate loading in single-implant restorations: An umbrella review
ABSTRACT
Background:
Immediate loading (IL) offers patients the advantage of reduced treatment time by immediate prosthes...

