Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Diodorus Cronus (late 4th–early 3rd centuries BC)
View through CrossRef
The most famous member of the Dialectical school, the Greek philosopher Diodorus Cronus maintained various paradoxical theses. He argued that any attempt to divide space, time or matter must end with little regions, periods or bodies that cannot further be divided; hence, he inferred, things cannot be in motion. Diodorus also contributed to the contemporary debate on conditionals: one proposition implies another, he held, if and only if it never has been possible, and is not now possible, to have the former proposition true and the latter proposition false. Diodorus is however most famous for inventing the master argument. The master argument relied on two assumptions: that every past truth is necessary, and that the impossible does not follow from the possible. It concluded, on these assumptions, that no proposition is possible unless it either is true or will be. The master argument was designed to support Diodorus’ definition of possibility: a proposition is possible if and only if it either is or will be true. This definition is not exactly tantamount to the fatalist doctrine that all truths are necessary, but it was felt to come too close to fatalism for comfort.
Title: Diodorus Cronus (late 4th–early 3rd centuries BC)
Description:
The most famous member of the Dialectical school, the Greek philosopher Diodorus Cronus maintained various paradoxical theses.
He argued that any attempt to divide space, time or matter must end with little regions, periods or bodies that cannot further be divided; hence, he inferred, things cannot be in motion.
Diodorus also contributed to the contemporary debate on conditionals: one proposition implies another, he held, if and only if it never has been possible, and is not now possible, to have the former proposition true and the latter proposition false.
Diodorus is however most famous for inventing the master argument.
The master argument relied on two assumptions: that every past truth is necessary, and that the impossible does not follow from the possible.
It concluded, on these assumptions, that no proposition is possible unless it either is true or will be.
The master argument was designed to support Diodorus’ definition of possibility: a proposition is possible if and only if it either is or will be true.
This definition is not exactly tantamount to the fatalist doctrine that all truths are necessary, but it was felt to come too close to fatalism for comfort.
Related Results
Thomas Hobbes, Diodorus Siculus, and Early Humanity
Thomas Hobbes, Diodorus Siculus, and Early Humanity
Abstract
This article offers a study of Thomas Hobbes’s reading of Diodorus Siculus, a Greek historiographer of the 1st century bc whom Hobbes called “the greatest antiquary perhap...
Diodorus (3), Diodorus Siculus, author of the
Bibliothēkē
, before 90 BCE–after 30 BCE
Diodorus (3), Diodorus Siculus, author of the
Bibliothēkē
, before 90 BCE–after 30 BCE
Abstract
Diodorus (3) of Agyrium, Sicily (hence “Diodorus Siculus”) is the author of the Bibliothēkē (‘Library’), a universal history whose scope spans (a) the ti...
Relationship between macronutrients, dietary components, and objective sleep variables measured by smartphone applications
Relationship between macronutrients, dietary components, and objective sleep variables measured by smartphone applications
Abstract
Background
Few studies have used daily data from objective applications to explore macronutrient interactions in sleep...
THE MAIN STAGES OF THE HISTORY OF POPULATION OF THE FOREST-STEPPE OF DNIEPER LEFT-BANK AREA IN THE MID-7th — EARLY 3rd CENTURY BC
THE MAIN STAGES OF THE HISTORY OF POPULATION OF THE FOREST-STEPPE OF DNIEPER LEFT-BANK AREA IN THE MID-7th — EARLY 3rd CENTURY BC
The paper is devoted to the periodization of the ethnic and cultural history of population of the forest-steppe of Dnieper Left Bank area during the Scythian Age. The analysis of t...
When Art Betrays Mythology: Acquitting Cronus (Κρόνος) in Goya’s Saturn
When Art Betrays Mythology: Acquitting Cronus (Κρόνος) in Goya’s Saturn
Francisco José de Goya y Lucientes (1746-1828) was a famous Spanish painter who is credited with painting a work titled Saturn Devouring One of His Sons. This work was one of over ...
The Bull of Phalaris and the Historical Method of Diodorus of Sicily
The Bull of Phalaris and the Historical Method of Diodorus of Sicily
The problems surrounding the bull of Phalaris have exercised ancient historians for well over a century now. The present study aims to open a new perspective in dealing with these ...
Semiramis’ Legacy
Semiramis’ Legacy
The chapter starts with a discussion on the historical characters that may have contributed to Diodorus’ imaginary picture of Semiramis. The chapter also make clear that Diodorus c...
EUNUS: THE COWARDLY KING
EUNUS: THE COWARDLY KING
In 135b.c., unable to endure the treatment of their master Damophilus, a group of slaves, urged on by the wonder-worker Eunus, captured the city of Enna in Eastern Sicily in a nigh...

