Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The 1932 Harvest and the Famine of 1933

View through CrossRef
Western and even Soviet publications have described the 1933 famine in the Soviet Union as “man-made” or “artificial.” The Stalinist leadership is presented as having imposed harsh procurement quotas on Ukraine and regions inhabited by other groups, such as Kuban’ Cossacks and Volga Germans, in order to suppress nationalism and to overcome opposition to collectivization. Proponents of this interpretation argue, using official Soviet statistics, that the 1932 grain harvest, especially in Ukraine, was not abnormally low and would have fed the population. Robert Conquest, for example, has referred to a Soviet study of drought to show that conditions were far better in 1932 than they were in 1936, a “non-famine year.” James Mace, the main author of a U.S. Congress investigation of the Ukraine famine, cites “post-Stalinist” statistics to show that this harvest was larger than those of 1931 or 1934 and refers to later Soviet historiography describing 1931 as a worse year than 1932 because of drought. On this basis he argues that the 1932 harvest would not have produced mass starvation.
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Title: The 1932 Harvest and the Famine of 1933
Description:
Western and even Soviet publications have described the 1933 famine in the Soviet Union as “man-made” or “artificial.
” The Stalinist leadership is presented as having imposed harsh procurement quotas on Ukraine and regions inhabited by other groups, such as Kuban’ Cossacks and Volga Germans, in order to suppress nationalism and to overcome opposition to collectivization.
Proponents of this interpretation argue, using official Soviet statistics, that the 1932 grain harvest, especially in Ukraine, was not abnormally low and would have fed the population.
Robert Conquest, for example, has referred to a Soviet study of drought to show that conditions were far better in 1932 than they were in 1936, a “non-famine year.
” James Mace, the main author of a U.
S.
Congress investigation of the Ukraine famine, cites “post-Stalinist” statistics to show that this harvest was larger than those of 1931 or 1934 and refers to later Soviet historiography describing 1931 as a worse year than 1932 because of drought.
On this basis he argues that the 1932 harvest would not have produced mass starvation.

Related Results

“The Sea of Our City”: Famine, Piracy, and Urban Sovereignty in Medieval Barcelona
“The Sea of Our City”: Famine, Piracy, and Urban Sovereignty in Medieval Barcelona
This article explores the issue of grain piracy during the famine year of 1333–1334 as a means to understanding the identity of medieval Barcelona within a broader Mediterranean co...
Organization of Grain Harvest Statistics in Siberia in 1930s
Organization of Grain Harvest Statistics in Siberia in 1930s
Harvest statistics in USSR in the 1920s was based on techniques and approaches used in Russian Empire. In 1930 it became a subject of reforms. Statistical representatives of villag...
Florence Nightingale and the Irish Uncanny
Florence Nightingale and the Irish Uncanny
This article characterizes Florence Nightingale's nursing reform as the cleaning of the Victorian home which she found unheimlich. She laid strong emphasis on an improvement in the...
New World, No World: Seeking Utopia in Padmanabhan's Harvest
New World, No World: Seeking Utopia in Padmanabhan's Harvest
This essay examines the theoretical and practical implications of performance as a utopian gesture, particularly with regard to postcolonial drama. Analyzing Manjula Padmanabhan's ...

Back to Top