Superior vena cava isolation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation - mind the phrenic

Abstract Background Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the standard of care for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), but medium-term success rates are far from ideal. Therefore, new methods are being developed, with emphasis on ectopic foci outside the pulmonary veins. Superior vena cava (SVC) is one of the most important non-pulmonary origins of AF and some studies suggested that empiric SVC isolation could improve outcomes in ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). Although complications have been reported in SVC ablation, most studies found complication rates of SVC ablation similar to conventional cryoballoon PVI. Aim This prospective, single-center study aimed to assess the complication rate and success rate of PVI followed by SVC isolation by cryoballoon application in comparison with conventional cryoballoon PVI. Methods We designed an unblinded, randomized clinical trial and recruited consecutive patients with PAF who were randomized to a conventional cryoballoon PVI or PVI and additional SVC cryoballoon isolation using single 180 s freeze. Results A total of 140 patients (61.4% male, mean age 62.1 years) with PAF were included and 67 (47.9%) were randomized to SVC isolation in addition to conventional ablation. Planned 180-s freeze in the SVC could be completed in 15 (22.4%) patients, while 27 (40.3%) patients received at least 120-s freeze. The mean time to SVC isolation was 40.2 ± 37.9 s. Real-time recording of SVC isolation was observed in 39 (58.2%) patients. Right phrenic nerve palsy (PNP), impending or transient, occurred in 6 (8.2%) patients in the PVI-only group and in 25 (37.3%) patients in the SVC-group (Chi-square test p < 0.001). There were no persistent PNP cases. Bradycardia or junctional rhythm was observed during a procedure in 15 (22.4%) patients who received SVC isolation. One patient eventually received a permanent AAI pacemaker due to a sinus node injury. Conclusion Our data suggest that SVC isolation can be successfully achieved in the majority of PAF patients using conventional cryoballoon. However, this significantly increases the rate of transient or impending PNP and sinus node injury in comparison to conventional cryoballoon PVI. Therefore, careful phrenic nerve function monitoring and attention to sinus bradycardia or junctional rhythm are important to mitigate this risk. Follow-up data are being collected to determine whether this risk could be outweighed by a lower rate of PAF recurrence.