Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The revision of the Declaration of Helsinki: past, present and future
View through CrossRef
The World Medical Association's Declaration of Helsinki was first adopted in 1964. In its 40‐year lifetime the Declaration has been revised five times and has risen to a position of prominence as a guiding statement of ethical principles for doctors involved in medical research. The most recent revision, however, has resulted in considerable controversy, particularly in the area of the ethical requirements surrounding placebo‐controlled trials and the question of responsibilities to research participants at the end of a study. This review considers the past versions of the Declaration of Helsinki and asks the question: How exactly has the text of the Declaration changed throughout its lifetime? Regarding the present form of the Declaration of Helsinki we ask: What are the major changes in the most recent revision and what are the controversies surrounding them? Finally, building on the detailed review of the past and present versions of the Declaration of Helsinki, we give consideration to some of the possible future trajectories for the Declaration in the light of its history and standing in the world of the ethics of medical research.
Title: The revision of the Declaration of Helsinki: past, present and future
Description:
The World Medical Association's Declaration of Helsinki was first adopted in 1964.
In its 40‐year lifetime the Declaration has been revised five times and has risen to a position of prominence as a guiding statement of ethical principles for doctors involved in medical research.
The most recent revision, however, has resulted in considerable controversy, particularly in the area of the ethical requirements surrounding placebo‐controlled trials and the question of responsibilities to research participants at the end of a study.
This review considers the past versions of the Declaration of Helsinki and asks the question: How exactly has the text of the Declaration changed throughout its lifetime? Regarding the present form of the Declaration of Helsinki we ask: What are the major changes in the most recent revision and what are the controversies surrounding them? Finally, building on the detailed review of the past and present versions of the Declaration of Helsinki, we give consideration to some of the possible future trajectories for the Declaration in the light of its history and standing in the world of the ethics of medical research.
Related Results
Physical Activity in Older Adults: Benefits, Risks of Inactivity, and Motivational Factors
Physical Activity in Older Adults: Benefits, Risks of Inactivity, and Motivational Factors
Background: Physical activity is essential for promoting health, autonomy and quality of life in older adults. However, adherence to exercise remains low worldwide. Motivation is r...
Declaration for Open Science and Research 2025—2030
Declaration for Open Science and Research 2025—2030
The Declaration for Open Science and Research 2025–2030 is an update to the previous Declaration for Open Science and Research 2020–2025. The declaration is elaborated in more deta...
Tapered Modular Femoral Stems for Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Show Excellent Mid-Term Survivorship
Tapered Modular Femoral Stems for Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Show Excellent Mid-Term Survivorship
Introduction: Revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) can be challenging in the face of proximal femoral bone loss, catastrophic implant failure, or recurrent hip instability. Tapere...
Early revision in total joint arthroplasty surgery – a narrative review
Early revision in total joint arthroplasty surgery – a narrative review
Purpose
Revision surgery is widely recognized as the main performance index for Total Joint Arthroplasty (TJA). Whereas long-term revision rate is used for meas...
Arthroscopic Capsulolabral Revision Repair for Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability
Arthroscopic Capsulolabral Revision Repair for Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability
Background: Open capsulolabral repair is still considered the standard revision procedure for a failed anterior shoulder instability repair. To date, only a few studies have evalua...
Revision Extension of Fusion Surgery in Thoracolumbar Spine Using a Newly Designed Revision Rod - Comparative Matched Cohort Study Versus Implant-Replacement Surgery
Revision Extension of Fusion Surgery in Thoracolumbar Spine Using a Newly Designed Revision Rod - Comparative Matched Cohort Study Versus Implant-Replacement Surgery
Study Design Retrospective cohort study. Objective To compare the results of revision extension of fusion surgery using the newly designed revision rod and implant-replacement surg...
Joint Replacement Registries Significantly Reduce Revision Rates
Joint Replacement Registries Significantly Reduce Revision Rates
Abstract
BackgroundDespite the rapid establishment of joint replacement registries (JRR), its effect on key outcomes such as revision rates is uncertain. While some countri...
Durability of Lumbar Diskectomy: A Survivorship Analysis Based on Revision Surgery Rates
Durability of Lumbar Diskectomy: A Survivorship Analysis Based on Revision Surgery Rates
Introduction:
Durability of surgical treatment is important to patients, providers, and payers. Lumbar diskectomy is one of the most commonly performed spinal s...

