Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Arthroscopic Capsulolabral Revision Repair for Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability

View through CrossRef
Background: Open capsulolabral repair is still considered the standard revision procedure for a failed anterior shoulder instability repair. To date, only a few studies have evaluated the outcome of arthroscopic revision instability repair. Purpose: This study was undertaken to assess the clinical outcome and postoperative sports activity level of arthroscopic revision stabilization using defined inclusion criteria and a standardized operative revision technique. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Fifty-six patients with recurrent anterior shoulder instability after an anatomic index procedure (open or arthroscopic) were included in the study. Arthroscopic revision repair was performed by a single surgeon using standardized suture anchor repair technique via an anteroinferior 5:30-o’clock approach. Patients were evaluated after a mean follow-up of 37 months (range, 25-72 months) with the Rowe, the Constant score, and the Simple Shoulder Test (SST). Return to sports, including sports level and discipline, were evaluated with a sports activity assessment tool. Results: For the revision repair, a minimum of 3 anchors were placed in the lower glenoid half. Recurrent instability after the revision procedure was found in 6 cases (11%). There were 4 recurrent instability cases caused by trauma and 2 atraumatic cases. Arthroscopic revision repair did not result in an additional loss of external rotation or additional subscapularis muscle insufficiency. The Rowe and Constant scores and the SST were significantly improved by the procedure. Eighty-six percent of the patients rated their result as good or excellent. Sports activity level was significantly improved by the procedure and the majority of patients returned to their previous sports level. Conclusion: Arthroscopic capsulolabral revision repair via the anteroinferior 5:30-o’clock approach achieves results comparable with open revision repairs with a low recurrent instability rate. Arthroscopic revision repair reached a high patient satisfaction, good clinical outcomes, and a high rate of return to sports. The results suggest that arthroscopic revision repair is a viable treatment option for selected patients with a failed index repair.
Title: Arthroscopic Capsulolabral Revision Repair for Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability
Description:
Background: Open capsulolabral repair is still considered the standard revision procedure for a failed anterior shoulder instability repair.
To date, only a few studies have evaluated the outcome of arthroscopic revision instability repair.
Purpose: This study was undertaken to assess the clinical outcome and postoperative sports activity level of arthroscopic revision stabilization using defined inclusion criteria and a standardized operative revision technique.
Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
Methods: Fifty-six patients with recurrent anterior shoulder instability after an anatomic index procedure (open or arthroscopic) were included in the study.
Arthroscopic revision repair was performed by a single surgeon using standardized suture anchor repair technique via an anteroinferior 5:30-o’clock approach.
Patients were evaluated after a mean follow-up of 37 months (range, 25-72 months) with the Rowe, the Constant score, and the Simple Shoulder Test (SST).
Return to sports, including sports level and discipline, were evaluated with a sports activity assessment tool.
Results: For the revision repair, a minimum of 3 anchors were placed in the lower glenoid half.
Recurrent instability after the revision procedure was found in 6 cases (11%).
There were 4 recurrent instability cases caused by trauma and 2 atraumatic cases.
Arthroscopic revision repair did not result in an additional loss of external rotation or additional subscapularis muscle insufficiency.
The Rowe and Constant scores and the SST were significantly improved by the procedure.
Eighty-six percent of the patients rated their result as good or excellent.
Sports activity level was significantly improved by the procedure and the majority of patients returned to their previous sports level.
Conclusion: Arthroscopic capsulolabral revision repair via the anteroinferior 5:30-o’clock approach achieves results comparable with open revision repairs with a low recurrent instability rate.
Arthroscopic revision repair reached a high patient satisfaction, good clinical outcomes, and a high rate of return to sports.
The results suggest that arthroscopic revision repair is a viable treatment option for selected patients with a failed index repair.

Related Results

Differential Diagnosis of Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Review
Differential Diagnosis of Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Review
Abstract Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a complex and often overlooked condition caused by the compression of neurovascular structures as they pass through the thoracic outlet. ...
Isokinetic and functional shoulder outcomes after arthroscopic capsulolabral stabilization
Isokinetic and functional shoulder outcomes after arthroscopic capsulolabral stabilization
Abstract Introduction Shoulder stability is secured by dynamic and static stabilizers. Rotator cuff is responsible for dy...
Comparative outcomes of open and arthroscopic approaches for recurrent anterior shoulder instability
Comparative outcomes of open and arthroscopic approaches for recurrent anterior shoulder instability
Background: A prominent orthopedic ailment that severely impairs function and lowers quality of life in young, energetic people is recurrent anterior shoulder instability. Surgical...
Arthroscopic capsulolabral revision repair for recurrent anterior shoulder instability
Arthroscopic capsulolabral revision repair for recurrent anterior shoulder instability
Background: Primary arthroscopic Bankart repair for anterior shoulder instability demonstrates reliable outcomes, yet recurrence rates range from 4% to 60%, with revision required ...
Controversies in the Surgical Management of Shoulder Instability: Open vs Arthroscopic Procedures
Controversies in the Surgical Management of Shoulder Instability: Open vs Arthroscopic Procedures
Background:Traumatic anterior instability of the shoulder is a common condition associated with a high recurrence rate in young adults. Operative treatment reduces the risk of recu...
Outcomes of Arthroscopic Repair of Panlabral Tears of the Glenohumeral Joint (SS‐03)
Outcomes of Arthroscopic Repair of Panlabral Tears of the Glenohumeral Joint (SS‐03)
Introduction Combined lesions of the glenoid labrum involving tears of the anterior, posterior, and superior labrum have been infrequently reported in the liter...
Outcomes of Shoulder Instability Repair - Latarjet vs Arthroscopic Bankart Repair: A Retrospective Study
Outcomes of Shoulder Instability Repair - Latarjet vs Arthroscopic Bankart Repair: A Retrospective Study
This retrospective study aimed to compare the outcomes of two surgical procedures, Latarjet repair and arthroscopic Bankart repair, for the treatment of anterior shoulder instabili...

Back to Top