Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Psychiatric assessment of kidney transplant candidates and living donors: An eight-year prospective study
View through CrossRef
Background: Post-transplant outcomes are strongly influenced by psychosocial and behavioral factors, particularly medication adherence, which has been identified as a key determinant of graft survival [1,2]. Given the prevalence of psychosocial vulnerabilities in transplant candidates, integrating psychiatric expertise into the pre-transplant evaluation has been shown to improve risk identification and support decision-making [3]. Structured psychosocial assessment tools, such as the Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplantation (SIPAT), further standardize this process and help clinicians evaluate candidates more comprehensively [4].
Objectives: To characterize psychiatric morbidity among kidney transplant candidates and living donors, to describe the implementation of a specialized psychiatric consultation program, and to assess its feasibility and preliminary outcomes.
Methods: This prospective, single-center study (January 2018–October 2025) was conducted at Mohammed V Military Hospital in Rabat. All transplant candidates, recipients, and potential living donors underwent comprehensive psychiatric evaluations using semi-structured interviews based on DSM-5 criteria [5]. The assessment protocol included individual evaluations and joint donor–recipient sessions.
Results: 30 transplant candidates/recipients (mean age 43.1 ± 12.3 years; 65% male) and 30 potential living donors were evaluated (N = 60). Among candidates, the most frequent psychiatric diagnoses were anxiety disorders (40%), depressive episodes (13.3%), and adjustment disorders (30%). Among the 26 patients with 6-month follow-up, medication adherence was 90.4%. Post-transplant psychiatric complications occurred in 6.75% of cases, all successfully managed. Living donors—95% of whom were first-degree relatives—showed lower rates of formal psychiatric diagnoses (16.7%) yet reported high levels of procedure-related anxiety (93.3%). Donor satisfaction was high (94.6%).
Conclusions: This study highlights the substantial psychiatric burden among kidney transplant candidates and demonstrates the feasibility of systematic psychiatric assessment in transplant programs. The high adherence rate (90.4%) underscores the value of integrated psychiatric care [9,10]. Psychiatric evaluation should evolve beyond a gatekeeping function to provide continuous therapeutic support throughout the transplant process.
Title: Psychiatric assessment of kidney transplant candidates and living donors: An eight-year prospective study
Description:
Background: Post-transplant outcomes are strongly influenced by psychosocial and behavioral factors, particularly medication adherence, which has been identified as a key determinant of graft survival [1,2].
Given the prevalence of psychosocial vulnerabilities in transplant candidates, integrating psychiatric expertise into the pre-transplant evaluation has been shown to improve risk identification and support decision-making [3].
Structured psychosocial assessment tools, such as the Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplantation (SIPAT), further standardize this process and help clinicians evaluate candidates more comprehensively [4].
Objectives: To characterize psychiatric morbidity among kidney transplant candidates and living donors, to describe the implementation of a specialized psychiatric consultation program, and to assess its feasibility and preliminary outcomes.
Methods: This prospective, single-center study (January 2018–October 2025) was conducted at Mohammed V Military Hospital in Rabat.
All transplant candidates, recipients, and potential living donors underwent comprehensive psychiatric evaluations using semi-structured interviews based on DSM-5 criteria [5].
The assessment protocol included individual evaluations and joint donor–recipient sessions.
Results: 30 transplant candidates/recipients (mean age 43.
1 ± 12.
3 years; 65% male) and 30 potential living donors were evaluated (N = 60).
Among candidates, the most frequent psychiatric diagnoses were anxiety disorders (40%), depressive episodes (13.
3%), and adjustment disorders (30%).
Among the 26 patients with 6-month follow-up, medication adherence was 90.
4%.
Post-transplant psychiatric complications occurred in 6.
75% of cases, all successfully managed.
Living donors—95% of whom were first-degree relatives—showed lower rates of formal psychiatric diagnoses (16.
7%) yet reported high levels of procedure-related anxiety (93.
3%).
Donor satisfaction was high (94.
6%).
Conclusions: This study highlights the substantial psychiatric burden among kidney transplant candidates and demonstrates the feasibility of systematic psychiatric assessment in transplant programs.
The high adherence rate (90.
4%) underscores the value of integrated psychiatric care [9,10].
Psychiatric evaluation should evolve beyond a gatekeeping function to provide continuous therapeutic support throughout the transplant process.
Related Results
Fracture Risk Among Living Kidney Donors 25 Years After Donation
Fracture Risk Among Living Kidney Donors 25 Years After Donation
ImportanceLiving kidney donors may have an increased risk of fractures due to reductions in kidney mass, lower concentrations of serum 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D, and secondary increa...
Follow-up of 12,559 Unrelated Donors of Peripheral Blood Stem Cells or Bone Marrow
Follow-up of 12,559 Unrelated Donors of Peripheral Blood Stem Cells or Bone Marrow
Abstract
Abstract 365
Donor follow-up is indicated to detect potential long-term risks for allogeneic stem cell donors. We sent a follow-up questionna...
Comparison of the Quality of Life and Emotional Responses in Kidney Transplant Recipients from Living and Deceased Donors in Nephrology Clinics
Comparison of the Quality of Life and Emotional Responses in Kidney Transplant Recipients from Living and Deceased Donors in Nephrology Clinics
Background: Quality of life (QoL) is one of the essential measures in assessing a patient's status after kidney transplant, and emotional response is an important factor in evaluat...
Practical Considerations for APOL1 Genotyping in the Living Kidney Donor Evaluation
Practical Considerations for APOL1 Genotyping in the Living Kidney Donor Evaluation
Background.
Association between the apolipoprotein L1 gene (APOL1) and nephropathy has altered the epidemiology of chronic kidney disease. In addition, donor APOL1 geno...
Simultaneous Heart-Kidney Transplant—Does Hospital Experience With Heart Transplant or Kidney Transplant Have a Greater Impact on Patient Outcomes?
Simultaneous Heart-Kidney Transplant—Does Hospital Experience With Heart Transplant or Kidney Transplant Have a Greater Impact on Patient Outcomes?
High institutional transplant volume is associated with improved outcomes in isolated heart and kidney transplant. The aim of this study was to assess trends and outcomes of simult...
Survival Advantage Comparing Older Living Donor Versus Standard Criteria Donor Kidney Transplants
Survival Advantage Comparing Older Living Donor Versus Standard Criteria Donor Kidney Transplants
The aim of this analysis was to explore mortality outcomes for kidney transplant candidates receiving older living donor kidneys (age ≥60 years) versus younger deceased donors or r...
Infections of Hepatitis B and C and Malaria Plasmodium Falciparum among Blood Donors in Ife East Local Government Area, Ile Ife, Osun State, Nigeria
Infections of Hepatitis B and C and Malaria Plasmodium Falciparum among Blood Donors in Ife East Local Government Area, Ile Ife, Osun State, Nigeria
Endemic regions for malaria are endemic for other infectious diseases that might affect the malaria infection. Infection with
hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) ar...
Donor–recipient relationships in African American vs. Caucasian live kidney donors
Donor–recipient relationships in African American vs. Caucasian live kidney donors
Reeves‐Daniel A, Bailey A, Assimos D, Westcott C, Adams PL, Hartmann EL, Rogers J, Farney AC, Stratta RJ, Daniel K, Freedman BI. Donor–recipient relationships in African American v...

