Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Intrauterine platelet rich plasma versus injection G-CSF for treatment of thin endometrium in infertility

View through CrossRef
Background: For success in IVF treatment, it is essential that the patient has a responsive endometrium together with many other factors. Inspite of numerous treatments available today for growth of endometrium, there is lack of any ideal drug or protocol for increasing endometrial thickness. The study is an attempt to evaluate the role of two drugs for increasing endometrial growth before embryos transfers.Methods: This study is a retrospective cohort study including 50 patients with previously diagnosed as thin endometrium patients who may or may not have failed previous cycles of IVF. Patients were randomly divided into two groups. First group-Group A (n=25) are patients randomly selected to undergo intrauterine PRP instillation for increase in endometrial thickness before embryo transfer. Second group-Group B (n=25) are randomly selected from a retrospective cohort of thin endometrium to take injection GCSF  as intrauterine infusion (total dose 300mcg) on day of trigger or day 11 of cycle followed by 60 units subcutaneously after embryo transfer. The difference in endometrial thickness during transfer and the pregnancy outcomes were compared.Results: Injection GCSF was found to be more effective than intrauterine PRP in improving endometrial thickness in patients with thin endometrium with a p-value of <0.0001.  It was found that the chemical and clinical pregnancy rates were comparable as the p values were 0.77 and 0.37 respectively and hence statistically not significant. Although patients given injection GCSF had a slightly higher clinical pregnancy rate (44%) as compared to patients given intrauterine PRP which was 28%. All other variables were comparable.Conclusions: In the study it was proven that injection GCSF, is more effective for the treatment of thin endometrium patients as compared to intrauterine PRP infusion. Though the clinical and chemical pregnancy rates were comparable, a higher percentage of women were clinically pregnant in the group given injection GCSF.  Intrauterine PRP can also be a good alternative for thin endometrium.  More studies and RCTS are needed for comparison to prove the effectiveness of these drugs for treatment of thin endometrium.
Title: Intrauterine platelet rich plasma versus injection G-CSF for treatment of thin endometrium in infertility
Description:
Background: For success in IVF treatment, it is essential that the patient has a responsive endometrium together with many other factors.
Inspite of numerous treatments available today for growth of endometrium, there is lack of any ideal drug or protocol for increasing endometrial thickness.
The study is an attempt to evaluate the role of two drugs for increasing endometrial growth before embryos transfers.
Methods: This study is a retrospective cohort study including 50 patients with previously diagnosed as thin endometrium patients who may or may not have failed previous cycles of IVF.
Patients were randomly divided into two groups.
First group-Group A (n=25) are patients randomly selected to undergo intrauterine PRP instillation for increase in endometrial thickness before embryo transfer.
Second group-Group B (n=25) are randomly selected from a retrospective cohort of thin endometrium to take injection GCSF  as intrauterine infusion (total dose 300mcg) on day of trigger or day 11 of cycle followed by 60 units subcutaneously after embryo transfer.
The difference in endometrial thickness during transfer and the pregnancy outcomes were compared.
Results: Injection GCSF was found to be more effective than intrauterine PRP in improving endometrial thickness in patients with thin endometrium with a p-value of <0.
0001.
  It was found that the chemical and clinical pregnancy rates were comparable as the p values were 0.
77 and 0.
37 respectively and hence statistically not significant.
Although patients given injection GCSF had a slightly higher clinical pregnancy rate (44%) as compared to patients given intrauterine PRP which was 28%.
All other variables were comparable.
Conclusions: In the study it was proven that injection GCSF, is more effective for the treatment of thin endometrium patients as compared to intrauterine PRP infusion.
Though the clinical and chemical pregnancy rates were comparable, a higher percentage of women were clinically pregnant in the group given injection GCSF.
  Intrauterine PRP can also be a good alternative for thin endometrium.
  More studies and RCTS are needed for comparison to prove the effectiveness of these drugs for treatment of thin endometrium.

Related Results

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF THROMBOCYTOPENIA AND RESULTANT CLINICAL INDICATIONS FOR PLATELET TRANSFUSION
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF THROMBOCYTOPENIA AND RESULTANT CLINICAL INDICATIONS FOR PLATELET TRANSFUSION
Careful evaluation of platelet survival data in normal individuals and patients with thrombocytopeniasecondary to marrow aplasia has demonstrated that platelets are lost from circu...
A pilot and ex-vivo study of examination of endometrium tissue by catheter based optical coherence tomography
A pilot and ex-vivo study of examination of endometrium tissue by catheter based optical coherence tomography
Abstract Objective This study aimed to distinguish ex-vivo normal and abnormal endometrium tissue samples histologically by catheter based optical c...
PREPARATION AND IN VITRO WOUND HEALING EFFECTS OF ANIMAL-BASED PLATELET-RICH PLASMA LYSATE
PREPARATION AND IN VITRO WOUND HEALING EFFECTS OF ANIMAL-BASED PLATELET-RICH PLASMA LYSATE
Wound healing is a vital field of study in both human and veterinary medicine, particularly in the treatment of chronic wounds. Platelet-rich plasma, known for its potential to enh...
Intracranial Cerebrospinal Fluid Volume Evaluation in Healthy People and Hydrocephalus Patients using SPACE Sequence
Intracranial Cerebrospinal Fluid Volume Evaluation in Healthy People and Hydrocephalus Patients using SPACE Sequence
Introduction: Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) is produced mainly by the choroid plexus but with a substantial influence by the ependymal lining of the ventricles in the brain. Hydrocepha...
Comparison of Adjunctive Use of G-CSF Vs Autologous PRP in IVF Patients with a Refractory Thin Endometrium: A Retrospective Record Review
Comparison of Adjunctive Use of G-CSF Vs Autologous PRP in IVF Patients with a Refractory Thin Endometrium: A Retrospective Record Review
Background: In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) is an important treatment option in the management of couples with infertility. Sadly, however, failure to achieve a pregnancy through IVF ...

Back to Top