Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Schopenhauer’s Ethics: A Metaphysics in Action

View through CrossRef
Disputations whether Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860) assent to a certain normative system of Ethics in his philosophy has been an interminable topic. Despite his dispiriting claim that philosophy can never ‘guide conduct’ as well as the determinability of character raises the question of how there exists a moral dimension in his works. Indeed, he states explicitly that his views on morality are entirely in the spirit of Christianity, as well as being consistent with the doctrines and ethical precepts of the sacred books of India (The World as Will and Representation, Section 68). Through this, by way of synoptic assessment, many works on Schopenhauer focused on compassion as the basis of his ethics. This paper will then seek to underscore a different vantage point on the grounding of his ethics, i.e., one which is emerging from metaphysics and achieves its embodiment in action. Hence, the principal intent of this paper is to ascertain a possible normative exposition of Schopenhauer’s moral philosophy. This entails an elucidation on whether there is a framework of Ethics embedded in his metaphysics and a critical analysis on the plausibility of this moral philosophy. References Atwell, J. Schopenhauer: The Human Character, Philadelphia: Temple University Press 1990. __________. Schopenhauer on the Character of the World, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995. Cartwright, David. “Scheler’s Criticisms of Schopenhauer’s Theory of Mitleid,” in Schopenhauer–Jahrbuch, (62), 1981. Cartwright, David E. Schopenhauer: A Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. Copleston, Frederick. Arthur Schopenhauer, Philosopher of Pessimism. London: Barnes and Noble, 1975. Hamlyn, D.W. Schopenhauer. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1980. Hübscher, Arthur, The Philosophy of Schopenhauer in Its Intellectual Context: Thinker Against the Tide. Translated by Joachim T. Baer and David E. Cartwright. Lewiston, N.Y : Edwin Mellon Press, 1989. Jacquette, Dale, ed. Schopenhauer, Philosophy, and the Arts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. Janaway, Christopher, ed. Willing and Nothingness: Schopenhauer as Nietzsche’s Educator. Oxford; Clarendon Press, 1998. Jonas, Hans. The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984. Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Norman Kemp Smith. London: Macmillan, 1929. _______________. Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals, trans. H. J. Paton. New York: Harper Torchbooks, 1964. Madigan, Timothy J. Nietzsche & Schopenhauer On Compassion. Retrieved from https://philosophynow.org/issues/29/Nietzsche_and_Schopenhauer_On_Compassion, 2000. Magee, Bryan. The Philosophy of Schopenhauer. Oxford: Carendon Press, 1983. Schopenhauer, Arthur. The World as Will and Idea, 3 Vols., translated by R. B. Haldane and J. Kemp, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd, 1883. _______________. The World as Will and Representation, Vols. I and II, translated by E. F. J. Payne, New York: Dover Publications, 1969. _______________. The World as Will and Presentation, Vol. I, translated by Richard Aquila in collaboration with David Carus, New York: Longman, 2007. _______________. The World as Will and Representation, Vol. I, translated by Judith Norman, Alistair Welchman, and Christopher Janaway, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. _______________. On the Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason. Translated by E.F.J. Payne. LaSalle: Open Court Press, 1997. ___________. On the Basis of Morality. Translated by E.F.J. Payne. Indianapolis: The Bobbs Merrill Company, 1965. ___________. On the Will in Nature. Translated by E.F.J. Payne. New York: Berg Publishers, 1992.___________. The Wisdom of Life and Counsels and Maxims. Translated by T. Bailey Saunders. Amherst, New York: Prometheus Books, 1995. Taylor, Richard. “Schopenhauer”. Journal of Philosophy 61 (9),pp.288-289: 1964. Troxell, Mary. Arthur Schopenhauer. Retrieved on February 11, 2017 from Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophyhttp://www.iep.utm.edu/schopenh/#SSH2bii 2011 Young, Julian, Willing and Unwilling: A Study in the Philosophy of Arthur Schopenhauer. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1987.
Title: Schopenhauer’s Ethics: A Metaphysics in Action
Description:
Disputations whether Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860) assent to a certain normative system of Ethics in his philosophy has been an interminable topic.
Despite his dispiriting claim that philosophy can never ‘guide conduct’ as well as the determinability of character raises the question of how there exists a moral dimension in his works.
Indeed, he states explicitly that his views on morality are entirely in the spirit of Christianity, as well as being consistent with the doctrines and ethical precepts of the sacred books of India (The World as Will and Representation, Section 68).
Through this, by way of synoptic assessment, many works on Schopenhauer focused on compassion as the basis of his ethics.
This paper will then seek to underscore a different vantage point on the grounding of his ethics, i.
e.
, one which is emerging from metaphysics and achieves its embodiment in action.
Hence, the principal intent of this paper is to ascertain a possible normative exposition of Schopenhauer’s moral philosophy.
This entails an elucidation on whether there is a framework of Ethics embedded in his metaphysics and a critical analysis on the plausibility of this moral philosophy.
References Atwell, J.
Schopenhauer: The Human Character, Philadelphia: Temple University Press 1990.
__________.
Schopenhauer on the Character of the World, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995.
Cartwright, David.
“Scheler’s Criticisms of Schopenhauer’s Theory of Mitleid,” in Schopenhauer–Jahrbuch, (62), 1981.
Cartwright, David E.
Schopenhauer: A Biography.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
Copleston, Frederick.
Arthur Schopenhauer, Philosopher of Pessimism.
London: Barnes and Noble, 1975.
Hamlyn, D.
W.
Schopenhauer.
London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1980.
Hübscher, Arthur, The Philosophy of Schopenhauer in Its Intellectual Context: Thinker Against the Tide.
Translated by Joachim T.
Baer and David E.
Cartwright.
Lewiston, N.
Y : Edwin Mellon Press, 1989.
Jacquette, Dale, ed.
Schopenhauer, Philosophy, and the Arts.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Janaway, Christopher, ed.
Willing and Nothingness: Schopenhauer as Nietzsche’s Educator.
Oxford; Clarendon Press, 1998.
Jonas, Hans.
The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984.
Kant, Immanuel.
Critique of Pure Reason, trans.
Norman Kemp Smith.
London: Macmillan, 1929.
_______________.
Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals, trans.
H.
J.
Paton.
New York: Harper Torchbooks, 1964.
Madigan, Timothy J.
Nietzsche & Schopenhauer On Compassion.
Retrieved from https://philosophynow.
org/issues/29/Nietzsche_and_Schopenhauer_On_Compassion, 2000.
Magee, Bryan.
The Philosophy of Schopenhauer.
Oxford: Carendon Press, 1983.
Schopenhauer, Arthur.
The World as Will and Idea, 3 Vols.
, translated by R.
B.
Haldane and J.
Kemp, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd, 1883.
_______________.
The World as Will and Representation, Vols.
I and II, translated by E.
F.
J.
Payne, New York: Dover Publications, 1969.
_______________.
The World as Will and Presentation, Vol.
I, translated by Richard Aquila in collaboration with David Carus, New York: Longman, 2007.
_______________.
The World as Will and Representation, Vol.
I, translated by Judith Norman, Alistair Welchman, and Christopher Janaway, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
_______________.
On the Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason.
Translated by E.
F.
J.
Payne.
LaSalle: Open Court Press, 1997.
___________.
On the Basis of Morality.
Translated by E.
F.
J.
Payne.
Indianapolis: The Bobbs Merrill Company, 1965.
___________.
On the Will in Nature.
Translated by E.
F.
J.
Payne.
New York: Berg Publishers, 1992.
___________.
The Wisdom of Life and Counsels and Maxims.
Translated by T.
Bailey Saunders.
Amherst, New York: Prometheus Books, 1995.
Taylor, Richard.
“Schopenhauer”.
Journal of Philosophy 61 (9),pp.
288-289: 1964.
Troxell, Mary.
Arthur Schopenhauer.
Retrieved on February 11, 2017 from Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophyhttp://www.
iep.
utm.
edu/schopenh/#SSH2bii 2011 Young, Julian, Willing and Unwilling: A Study in the Philosophy of Arthur Schopenhauer.
Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1987.

Related Results

Interface Between Metaphysics and Science
Interface Between Metaphysics and Science
The interface between metaphysics and science refers to the close-knit relationship between Metaphysics as First Philosophy and science. The first conception of metaphysics by Aris...
Metaphysics
Metaphysics
AbstractThis chapter introduces some central issues and themes in feminist philosophical engagements with metaphysics. It provides an outline of what feminist metaphysics typically...
A Critique of Principlism
A Critique of Principlism
Photo by Towfiqu barbhuiya on Unsplash INTRODUCTION Bioethics does not have an explicitly stated and agreed upon means of resolving conflicts between normative theories. As such, b...
Kapaligiran, Etika at Negosyo
Kapaligiran, Etika at Negosyo
The causes of the environmental crisis are many and diverse, and so are the possible ways to handle and eventually resolve this crisis. This essay advances one of such possible way...
Contemporary Metaphysics
Contemporary Metaphysics
There is no general agreement or consensus about how to define metaphysics. The word itself derives from the title of one of Aristotle’s books, one that deals with decidedly metaph...
Kavramsal Putperestlik ve Felsefe-Jean-Luc Marion Felsefesine Bir Giriş
Kavramsal Putperestlik ve Felsefe-Jean-Luc Marion Felsefesine Bir Giriş
Conceptual Idolatry and Philosophy -An Introduction to the Philosophy of Jean-Luc Marion-rnJean-Luc Marion, regarded as one of the most important representatives of contemporary Fr...
Karl Christian Friedrich Krause’s Influence on Schopenhauer’s Philosophy
Karl Christian Friedrich Krause’s Influence on Schopenhauer’s Philosophy
Arthur Schopenhauer and Karl Christian Friedrich Krause used to live in the same house in Dresden in 1815 to 1816. Both Schopenhauer and Krause took a huge interest in Indian philo...
Schopenhauer e a Religião
Schopenhauer e a Religião
O que segue é a tradução do artigo Schopenhauer und die Religion, de Paul Deussen, apresentado pelo autor durante o terceiro Congresso da Schopenhauer-Gesellschaft (Sociedade Schop...

Back to Top