Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Schopenhauer’s Ethics: A Metaphysics in Action
View through CrossRef
Disputations whether Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860) assent to a certain normative system of Ethics in his philosophy has been an interminable topic. Despite his dispiriting claim that philosophy can never ‘guide conduct’ as well as the determinability of character raises the question of how there exists a moral dimension in his works. Indeed, he states explicitly that his views on morality are entirely in the spirit of Christianity, as well as being consistent with the doctrines and ethical precepts of the sacred books of India (The World as Will and Representation, Section 68). Through this, by way of synoptic assessment, many works on Schopenhauer focused on compassion as the basis of his ethics. This paper will then seek to underscore a different vantage point on the grounding of his ethics, i.e., one which is emerging from metaphysics and achieves its embodiment in action. Hence, the principal intent of this paper is to ascertain a possible normative exposition of Schopenhauer’s moral philosophy. This entails an elucidation on whether there is a framework of Ethics embedded in his metaphysics and a critical analysis on the plausibility of this moral philosophy.
References
Atwell, J. Schopenhauer: The Human Character, Philadelphia: Temple University Press 1990.
__________. Schopenhauer on the Character of the World, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995.
Cartwright, David. “Scheler’s Criticisms of Schopenhauer’s Theory of Mitleid,” in Schopenhauer–Jahrbuch, (62), 1981.
Cartwright, David E. Schopenhauer: A Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
Copleston, Frederick. Arthur Schopenhauer, Philosopher of Pessimism. London: Barnes and Noble, 1975.
Hamlyn, D.W. Schopenhauer. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1980.
Hübscher, Arthur, The Philosophy of Schopenhauer in Its Intellectual Context: Thinker Against the Tide. Translated by Joachim T. Baer and David E. Cartwright. Lewiston, N.Y : Edwin Mellon Press, 1989.
Jacquette, Dale, ed. Schopenhauer, Philosophy, and the Arts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Janaway, Christopher, ed. Willing and Nothingness: Schopenhauer as Nietzsche’s Educator. Oxford; Clarendon Press, 1998.
Jonas, Hans. The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984.
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Norman Kemp Smith. London: Macmillan, 1929.
_______________. Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals, trans. H. J. Paton. New York: Harper Torchbooks, 1964.
Madigan, Timothy J. Nietzsche & Schopenhauer On Compassion. Retrieved from https://philosophynow.org/issues/29/Nietzsche_and_Schopenhauer_On_Compassion, 2000.
Magee, Bryan. The Philosophy of Schopenhauer. Oxford: Carendon Press, 1983.
Schopenhauer, Arthur. The World as Will and Idea, 3 Vols., translated by R. B. Haldane and J. Kemp, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd, 1883.
_______________. The World as Will and Representation, Vols. I and II, translated by E. F. J. Payne, New York: Dover Publications, 1969.
_______________. The World as Will and Presentation, Vol. I, translated by Richard Aquila in collaboration with David Carus, New York: Longman, 2007.
_______________. The World as Will and Representation, Vol. I, translated by Judith Norman, Alistair Welchman, and Christopher Janaway, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
_______________. On the Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason. Translated by E.F.J. Payne. LaSalle: Open Court Press, 1997.
___________. On the Basis of Morality. Translated by E.F.J. Payne. Indianapolis: The Bobbs Merrill Company, 1965.
___________. On the Will in Nature. Translated by E.F.J. Payne. New York: Berg Publishers, 1992.___________. The Wisdom of Life and Counsels and Maxims. Translated by T. Bailey Saunders. Amherst, New York: Prometheus Books, 1995.
Taylor, Richard. “Schopenhauer”. Journal of Philosophy 61 (9),pp.288-289: 1964.
Troxell, Mary. Arthur Schopenhauer. Retrieved on February 11, 2017 from Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophyhttp://www.iep.utm.edu/schopenh/#SSH2bii 2011
Young, Julian, Willing and Unwilling: A Study in the Philosophy of Arthur Schopenhauer. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1987.
San Beda University
Title: Schopenhauer’s Ethics: A Metaphysics in Action
Description:
Disputations whether Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860) assent to a certain normative system of Ethics in his philosophy has been an interminable topic.
Despite his dispiriting claim that philosophy can never ‘guide conduct’ as well as the determinability of character raises the question of how there exists a moral dimension in his works.
Indeed, he states explicitly that his views on morality are entirely in the spirit of Christianity, as well as being consistent with the doctrines and ethical precepts of the sacred books of India (The World as Will and Representation, Section 68).
Through this, by way of synoptic assessment, many works on Schopenhauer focused on compassion as the basis of his ethics.
This paper will then seek to underscore a different vantage point on the grounding of his ethics, i.
e.
, one which is emerging from metaphysics and achieves its embodiment in action.
Hence, the principal intent of this paper is to ascertain a possible normative exposition of Schopenhauer’s moral philosophy.
This entails an elucidation on whether there is a framework of Ethics embedded in his metaphysics and a critical analysis on the plausibility of this moral philosophy.
References
Atwell, J.
Schopenhauer: The Human Character, Philadelphia: Temple University Press 1990.
__________.
Schopenhauer on the Character of the World, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995.
Cartwright, David.
“Scheler’s Criticisms of Schopenhauer’s Theory of Mitleid,” in Schopenhauer–Jahrbuch, (62), 1981.
Cartwright, David E.
Schopenhauer: A Biography.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
Copleston, Frederick.
Arthur Schopenhauer, Philosopher of Pessimism.
London: Barnes and Noble, 1975.
Hamlyn, D.
W.
Schopenhauer.
London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1980.
Hübscher, Arthur, The Philosophy of Schopenhauer in Its Intellectual Context: Thinker Against the Tide.
Translated by Joachim T.
Baer and David E.
Cartwright.
Lewiston, N.
Y : Edwin Mellon Press, 1989.
Jacquette, Dale, ed.
Schopenhauer, Philosophy, and the Arts.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Janaway, Christopher, ed.
Willing and Nothingness: Schopenhauer as Nietzsche’s Educator.
Oxford; Clarendon Press, 1998.
Jonas, Hans.
The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984.
Kant, Immanuel.
Critique of Pure Reason, trans.
Norman Kemp Smith.
London: Macmillan, 1929.
_______________.
Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals, trans.
H.
J.
Paton.
New York: Harper Torchbooks, 1964.
Madigan, Timothy J.
Nietzsche & Schopenhauer On Compassion.
Retrieved from https://philosophynow.
org/issues/29/Nietzsche_and_Schopenhauer_On_Compassion, 2000.
Magee, Bryan.
The Philosophy of Schopenhauer.
Oxford: Carendon Press, 1983.
Schopenhauer, Arthur.
The World as Will and Idea, 3 Vols.
, translated by R.
B.
Haldane and J.
Kemp, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd, 1883.
_______________.
The World as Will and Representation, Vols.
I and II, translated by E.
F.
J.
Payne, New York: Dover Publications, 1969.
_______________.
The World as Will and Presentation, Vol.
I, translated by Richard Aquila in collaboration with David Carus, New York: Longman, 2007.
_______________.
The World as Will and Representation, Vol.
I, translated by Judith Norman, Alistair Welchman, and Christopher Janaway, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
_______________.
On the Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason.
Translated by E.
F.
J.
Payne.
LaSalle: Open Court Press, 1997.
___________.
On the Basis of Morality.
Translated by E.
F.
J.
Payne.
Indianapolis: The Bobbs Merrill Company, 1965.
___________.
On the Will in Nature.
Translated by E.
F.
J.
Payne.
New York: Berg Publishers, 1992.
___________.
The Wisdom of Life and Counsels and Maxims.
Translated by T.
Bailey Saunders.
Amherst, New York: Prometheus Books, 1995.
Taylor, Richard.
“Schopenhauer”.
Journal of Philosophy 61 (9),pp.
288-289: 1964.
Troxell, Mary.
Arthur Schopenhauer.
Retrieved on February 11, 2017 from Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophyhttp://www.
iep.
utm.
edu/schopenh/#SSH2bii 2011
Young, Julian, Willing and Unwilling: A Study in the Philosophy of Arthur Schopenhauer.
Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1987.
Related Results
AMA Announcement: Monday 11/14 12PM ET - Stephen Puryear (North Carolina State) on history of philosophy, metaphysics and ethics
AMA Announcement: Monday 11/14 12PM ET - Stephen Puryear (North Carolina State) on history of philosophy, metaphysics and ethics
As previously announced, /r/philosophy is hosting an AMA series this
fall semester which kicked off with AMAs by Caspar Hare (MIT), Kevin
Scharp, Kenneth Ehrenberg, Geoff Pynn and ...
Freedom and Morality
Freedom and Morality
Most contemporary ethical theorists do not look to Schopenhauer as a resource for contemporary normative ethics. Chapters 1 and 2 dispel one of the main reasons for this—namely, th...
A Convex Mirror
A Convex Mirror
Abstract
Schopenhauer is acknowledged as “the philosopher of pessimism” and author of a system that teaches how art and morality can help humans navigate life in “th...
Reconstructing Schopenhauer's Ethics
Reconstructing Schopenhauer's Ethics
At the apex of his influence, from about 1860 up to the start of World War I, Arthur Schopenhauer was known first and foremost as a philosopher of pessimism, sparking an entire “pe...
Introduction
Introduction
This Introduction to the Oxford Handbook of Schopenhauer begins with a brief overview of Schopenhauer’s life and philosophical interests, emphasizing how the experience of compassi...
O conhecimento das ideias em Schopenhauer
O conhecimento das ideias em Schopenhauer
O conhecimento das ideias em Schopenhauer
O intuito da presente comunicação é deslindar os conceitos fundamentais do que podemos denominar a “Filosofia da Arte” do pensador alemão...
Religion and Ethics in Schopenhauer
Religion and Ethics in Schopenhauer
Schopenhauer’s theory of religion is mainly discussed in his ethics. Therefore, conventional studies often argue that Schopenhauer made an attempt to make a rational justification ...
Interface Between Metaphysics and Science
Interface Between Metaphysics and Science
The interface between metaphysics and science refers to the close-knit relationship between Metaphysics as First Philosophy and science. The first conception of metaphysics by Aris...

