Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

A national-scale methodology for prioritizing landslide monitoring sites

View through CrossRef
Landslides represent a crucial issue for Italy due to their impacts on population, environment, cultural heritage, transportation infrastructure, and economic activities. More than 684,000 landslides have been mapped in the Italian Landslide Inventory, and approximately 28% of them are classified as rapid phenomena, such as rock falls and debris flows, often associated with serious consequences in terms of loss of human lives and damage to buildings and infrastructure.As highlighted in the Kyoto 2020 Commitment for the Global Promotion of Understanding and Reducing Landslide Disaster Risk, effective landslide risk reduction relies on improved understanding of landslide processes, increased public awareness, and the continuous advancement of monitoring technologies. In this framework, landslide in situ monitoring represents a strategic action to assess landslide evolution, support the design of stabilization works, and verify their effectiveness over time, as well as to alert the population through early warning systems (EWS).A methodology for the prioritization of landslide monitoring sites has been developed and tested at the national scale, in the framework of the RESILIENT research Project “Risk Evaluation and Smart Implementation of Landslide monItoring by citizen Engagement and New Technologies” funded by Fondazione Cariplo's “Safe Territories” initiative. The adopted methodology is the result of a multidisciplinary effort involving geologists, engineers, risk analysts, public authorities, and other stakeholders, ensuring that both scientific robustness and operational needs were addressed.This prioritization approach takes into account several factors describing landslide hazard (e.g., type of movement, area, velocity) as well as potential impact on human lives and infrastructure (buildings, urban areas, population, road and railway network, service infrastructure, cultural heritage, etc.). Such algorithm may become a valuable tool to support decision-makers in selecting new sites where a landslide monitoring system could provide the greatest benefits for local communities in terms of risk reduction.To date (January 2026), information on 1,024 in situ monitoring systems across the country is available in the National Register of Landslide in situ Monitoring Systems, designed by ISPRA in 2021, in collaboration with Regions, Provinces, and Regional Environmental Protection Agencies (ARPAs). Active monitoring systems are 545 (53%) while dismantled and under construction systems are 358 (35%) and 121 (12%), respectively. Most of the systems (827; 81%) have a knowledge purpose while 197 systems (19%) are or have been also used as early warning systems. Data acquisition is performed manually (67.4%), automatically (13%) or in both ways (19.6%). The most used instruments are inclinometers and piezometers, followed by topographic instrumentation (e.g., Total Stations, GNSS), crack meters, weather stations, strain gauges, etc. Data is published in the Landslide monitoring section of the IdroGEO national web platform (https://idrogeo.isprambiente.it), accessible from desktops, tablets, and smartphones, that allows viewing monitoring system/stations/sensors location and metadata information, searching and filtering of monitoring systems, and statistics on number, data acquisition and type of instrumentation.
Title: A national-scale methodology for prioritizing landslide monitoring sites
Description:
Landslides represent a crucial issue for Italy due to their impacts on population, environment, cultural heritage, transportation infrastructure, and economic activities.
More than 684,000 landslides have been mapped in the Italian Landslide Inventory, and approximately 28% of them are classified as rapid phenomena, such as rock falls and debris flows, often associated with serious consequences in terms of loss of human lives and damage to buildings and infrastructure.
As highlighted in the Kyoto 2020 Commitment for the Global Promotion of Understanding and Reducing Landslide Disaster Risk, effective landslide risk reduction relies on improved understanding of landslide processes, increased public awareness, and the continuous advancement of monitoring technologies.
In this framework, landslide in situ monitoring represents a strategic action to assess landslide evolution, support the design of stabilization works, and verify their effectiveness over time, as well as to alert the population through early warning systems (EWS).
A methodology for the prioritization of landslide monitoring sites has been developed and tested at the national scale, in the framework of the RESILIENT research Project “Risk Evaluation and Smart Implementation of Landslide monItoring by citizen Engagement and New Technologies” funded by Fondazione Cariplo's “Safe Territories” initiative.
The adopted methodology is the result of a multidisciplinary effort involving geologists, engineers, risk analysts, public authorities, and other stakeholders, ensuring that both scientific robustness and operational needs were addressed.
This prioritization approach takes into account several factors describing landslide hazard (e.
g.
, type of movement, area, velocity) as well as potential impact on human lives and infrastructure (buildings, urban areas, population, road and railway network, service infrastructure, cultural heritage, etc.
).
Such algorithm may become a valuable tool to support decision-makers in selecting new sites where a landslide monitoring system could provide the greatest benefits for local communities in terms of risk reduction.
To date (January 2026), information on 1,024 in situ monitoring systems across the country is available in the National Register of Landslide in situ Monitoring Systems, designed by ISPRA in 2021, in collaboration with Regions, Provinces, and Regional Environmental Protection Agencies (ARPAs).
Active monitoring systems are 545 (53%) while dismantled and under construction systems are 358 (35%) and 121 (12%), respectively.
Most of the systems (827; 81%) have a knowledge purpose while 197 systems (19%) are or have been also used as early warning systems.
Data acquisition is performed manually (67.
4%), automatically (13%) or in both ways (19.
6%).
The most used instruments are inclinometers and piezometers, followed by topographic instrumentation (e.
g.
, Total Stations, GNSS), crack meters, weather stations, strain gauges, etc.
Data is published in the Landslide monitoring section of the IdroGEO national web platform (https://idrogeo.
isprambiente.
it), accessible from desktops, tablets, and smartphones, that allows viewing monitoring system/stations/sensors location and metadata information, searching and filtering of monitoring systems, and statistics on number, data acquisition and type of instrumentation.

Related Results

Landslide size matters: a new spatial predictive paradigm
Landslide size matters: a new spatial predictive paradigm
<p>The standard definition of landslide hazard requires the estimation of where, when (or how frequently) and how large a given landslide event may be. The geomorphol...
Magnetic characterization of soils in landslide area (Case study: Cihanjuang Village, Sumedang, West Java)
Magnetic characterization of soils in landslide area (Case study: Cihanjuang Village, Sumedang, West Java)
Abstract A landslide is one type of natural disaster due to the movement of masses of soil or rock moving down the slope. There is a place in Cihanjuang Village, Sum...
ANALISIS PERTIMBANGAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG DALAM MENGABULKAN KASASI TERDAKWA (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 2959/K/PID.SUS/2022)
ANALISIS PERTIMBANGAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG DALAM MENGABULKAN KASASI TERDAKWA (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 2959/K/PID.SUS/2022)
<p><em><span class="markedContent"><span style="left: calc(var(--scale-factor)*195.53px); top: calc(var(--scale-factor)*496.87px); font-size: calc(var(--scale-...
Meteorological drivers of seasonal motion at the Barry Arm Landslide, Prince William Sound, Alaska
Meteorological drivers of seasonal motion at the Barry Arm Landslide, Prince William Sound, Alaska
Global climate change creates geologic hazard cascades as the cryosphere experiences warming. The rapid retreat of Barry Glacier, a tidewater glacier in Prince William Sound, Alask...
Analysis Landslide Hazard in Banjarmangu Sub District, Banjarnegara District
Analysis Landslide Hazard in Banjarmangu Sub District, Banjarnegara District
The objective of the research is to find the most suitable soil conservation practice that may be applied to control landslide hazard. In order to achieve that objective, some rese...
Landslide hazard zone mapping using Information Value model: the case of Gidole Landslide, Southern Ethiopia
Landslide hazard zone mapping using Information Value model: the case of Gidole Landslide, Southern Ethiopia
&lt;p&gt;Landslide hazard is becoming serious environmental constraints for the developmental activities in the highlands of Ethiopia. With the current infrastructure devel...
Landslide hydro-meteorological thresholds in Rwanda
Landslide hydro-meteorological thresholds in Rwanda
&lt;p&gt;For the development of regional landslide early warning systems, empirical-statistical thresholds are of crucial importance. The thresholds indicate the meteorolog...

Back to Top