Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Analysis Landslide Hazard in Banjarmangu Sub District, Banjarnegara District
View through CrossRef
The objective of the research is to find the most suitable soil conservation practice that may be applied to control landslide hazard. In order to achieve that objective, some research steps must be done, are: (1) to identify the land characteristics of the study area that is based on the understanding of some factors that caused and triggered the landslide hazard, i.e.: slope morphology, rocks/soils characteristics, climatic condition, and landuse; (2) to study the types of landslide that occurs in every landforms and determine the area having ideal landslide form; The proposed landslide in this research is the process of masswasting down-slope as a result of the gravitation action on materials being sliding. The landslide types is including creep, slide, slump, and rocks/soils fall. The methods that being applied in the research include field survey methods and the method for determining landslide hazard by using geographic information techniques. Field survey method was intended to characterize the location of every landslide that have been happened in the study area. The results of field survey were applied as materials for determinating the grade of landslide hazard. Scorring and weighting methods of factors that influence landslide was apllied to determine the grade of landslide hazard. Scor and weight were not same for every parameters used for evaluation. The result of field research shows that landslide happen in every landform unit The study area can be devided into 9 landform unit. The landform units are differentiated into the landslide hazard classes, the study area there were found 5 classes of landslide hazard, namely: (1) vary low hazard equal to 16,65% (1 landform unit); (2) low hazard equal to 7,63% (1 landform unit); (3) medium hazard equal to 37,58% (3 landform unit); (4) high hazard equal to 25,41% (2 landforms unit); and (5) highest hazard equal to 12,73% (2 landform unit). Evaluation of landslide hazard shows hat most of study area have high risk to slide as a result of complex interaction between many factors of landslide.
Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
Title: Analysis Landslide Hazard in Banjarmangu Sub District, Banjarnegara District
Description:
The objective of the research is to find the most suitable soil conservation practice that may be applied to control landslide hazard.
In order to achieve that objective, some research steps must be done, are: (1) to identify the land characteristics of the study area that is based on the understanding of some factors that caused and triggered the landslide hazard, i.
e.
: slope morphology, rocks/soils characteristics, climatic condition, and landuse; (2) to study the types of landslide that occurs in every landforms and determine the area having ideal landslide form; The proposed landslide in this research is the process of masswasting down-slope as a result of the gravitation action on materials being sliding.
The landslide types is including creep, slide, slump, and rocks/soils fall.
The methods that being applied in the research include field survey methods and the method for determining landslide hazard by using geographic information techniques.
Field survey method was intended to characterize the location of every landslide that have been happened in the study area.
The results of field survey were applied as materials for determinating the grade of landslide hazard.
Scorring and weighting methods of factors that influence landslide was apllied to determine the grade of landslide hazard.
Scor and weight were not same for every parameters used for evaluation.
The result of field research shows that landslide happen in every landform unit The study area can be devided into 9 landform unit.
The landform units are differentiated into the landslide hazard classes, the study area there were found 5 classes of landslide hazard, namely: (1) vary low hazard equal to 16,65% (1 landform unit); (2) low hazard equal to 7,63% (1 landform unit); (3) medium hazard equal to 37,58% (3 landform unit); (4) high hazard equal to 25,41% (2 landforms unit); and (5) highest hazard equal to 12,73% (2 landform unit).
Evaluation of landslide hazard shows hat most of study area have high risk to slide as a result of complex interaction between many factors of landslide.
Related Results
Landslide risk for the territory of Bulgaria by administrative districts
Landslide risk for the territory of Bulgaria by administrative districts
An assessment of the landslide risk (Rls) for the territory of Bulgaria by administrative districts has been made by combining the vulnerability (V) and landslide hazard (Hls) maps...
Landslide size matters: a new spatial predictive paradigm
Landslide size matters: a new spatial predictive paradigm
<p>The standard definition of landslide hazard requires the estimation of where, when (or how frequently) and how large a given landslide event may be. The geomorphol...
Analisis Morfometri dan Morfostruktur Lereng Kejadian Longsor di Kecamatan Banjarmangu Kabupaten Banjarnegara
Analisis Morfometri dan Morfostruktur Lereng Kejadian Longsor di Kecamatan Banjarmangu Kabupaten Banjarnegara
The aims of this research are: (a) to study and classify the landslide hazard level, and (b) to analysis morphometry and morphostructure slope at occurrence slides in the research ...
Meteorological drivers of seasonal motion at the Barry Arm Landslide, Prince William Sound, Alaska
Meteorological drivers of seasonal motion at the Barry Arm Landslide, Prince William Sound, Alaska
Global climate change creates geologic hazard cascades as the cryosphere experiences warming. The rapid retreat of Barry Glacier, a tidewater glacier in Prince William Sound, Alask...
Using satellite soil moisture and rainfall in the Landslide Hazard Assessment for Situational Awareness system
Using satellite soil moisture and rainfall in the Landslide Hazard Assessment for Situational Awareness system
<p>The Landslide Hazard Assessment for Situational Awareness system (LHASA) gives a global view of landslide hazard in nearly real time. Currently, it is being upgrad...
Landslide hazard zonation using logistic regression technique: the case of Shafe and Baso catchments, Gamo highland, Ethiopia
Landslide hazard zonation using logistic regression technique: the case of Shafe and Baso catchments, Gamo highland, Ethiopia
Abstract
Landslide hazard zonation plays an important role in safe and viable infrastructure development, urbanization, land use, and environmental planning. The Shafe and ...
Landslide hydro-meteorological thresholds in Rwanda
Landslide hydro-meteorological thresholds in Rwanda
<p>For the development of regional landslide early warning systems, empirical-statistical thresholds are of crucial importance. The thresholds indicate the meteorolog...
GIS based mapping and analysis of landslide hazard’s impact on tourism: a case study of Balakot valley, Pakistan
GIS based mapping and analysis of landslide hazard’s impact on tourism: a case study of Balakot valley, Pakistan
The Landslide occurs in mountainous area due to failure of slope through intensive rain and earthquake. Region wise Himalayan is one of prone area of world in context of slope fail...

