Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Adherence to Statin Therapy Among US Adults Between 2007 and 2014

View through CrossRef
Background Prior studies suggest that persistence with and adherence to statin therapy is low. Interventions to improve statin persistence and adherence have been developed over the past decade. Methods and Results This was a retrospective cohort study of adults aged ≥21 y with commercial or government health insurance in the MarketScan (Truven Health Analytics) and Medicare databases who initiated statins in 2007–2014 and (1) started treatment after a myocardial infarction (n=201 573), (2) had diabetes mellitus but without coronary heart disease (CHD; n=610 049), or (3) did not have CHD or diabetes mellitus (n=2 244 868). Persistence with (ie, not discontinuing treatment) and high adherence to statin therapy were assessed using pharmacy fills in the year following treatment initiation. In 2007 and 2014, the proportions of patients persistent with statin therapy were 78.1% and 79.1%, respectively, among those initiating treatment following myocardial infarction; 66.5% and 67.3%, respectively, for those with diabetes mellitus but without CHD; and 64.3% and 63.9%, respectively, for those without CHD or diabetes mellitus. Between 2007 and 2014, high adherence to statin therapy increased from 57.9% to 63.8% among patients initiating treatment following myocardial infarction and from 34.9% to 37.6% among those with diabetes mellitus but without CHD (each P trend <0.001). Among patients without CHD or diabetes mellitus, high adherence did not improve between 2007 (35.7%) and 2014 (36.8%; P trend =0.14). In 2014, statin adherence was lower among younger, black, and Hispanic patients versus white patients and those initiating a high‐intensity statin dosage. Statin adherence was higher among men and patients with cardiologist care following treatment initiation. Conclusions Persistence with and adherence to statin therapy remain low, particularly among those without CHD.
Title: Adherence to Statin Therapy Among US Adults Between 2007 and 2014
Description:
Background Prior studies suggest that persistence with and adherence to statin therapy is low.
Interventions to improve statin persistence and adherence have been developed over the past decade.
Methods and Results This was a retrospective cohort study of adults aged ≥21 y with commercial or government health insurance in the MarketScan (Truven Health Analytics) and Medicare databases who initiated statins in 2007–2014 and (1) started treatment after a myocardial infarction (n=201 573), (2) had diabetes mellitus but without coronary heart disease (CHD; n=610 049), or (3) did not have CHD or diabetes mellitus (n=2 244 868).
Persistence with (ie, not discontinuing treatment) and high adherence to statin therapy were assessed using pharmacy fills in the year following treatment initiation.
In 2007 and 2014, the proportions of patients persistent with statin therapy were 78.
1% and 79.
1%, respectively, among those initiating treatment following myocardial infarction; 66.
5% and 67.
3%, respectively, for those with diabetes mellitus but without CHD; and 64.
3% and 63.
9%, respectively, for those without CHD or diabetes mellitus.
Between 2007 and 2014, high adherence to statin therapy increased from 57.
9% to 63.
8% among patients initiating treatment following myocardial infarction and from 34.
9% to 37.
6% among those with diabetes mellitus but without CHD (each P trend <0.
001).
Among patients without CHD or diabetes mellitus, high adherence did not improve between 2007 (35.
7%) and 2014 (36.
8%; P trend =0.
14).
In 2014, statin adherence was lower among younger, black, and Hispanic patients versus white patients and those initiating a high‐intensity statin dosage.
Statin adherence was higher among men and patients with cardiologist care following treatment initiation.
Conclusions Persistence with and adherence to statin therapy remain low, particularly among those without CHD.

Related Results

Predictors of statin adherence in primary care using real-world data
Predictors of statin adherence in primary care using real-world data
Abstract Purpose The objective of this study was to identify predictors of statin adherence in the primary and secondary preven...
Abstract MP76: Trends in Adherence to Statin Therapy Among US Adults With Health Insurance Between 2007 and 2014
Abstract MP76: Trends in Adherence to Statin Therapy Among US Adults With Health Insurance Between 2007 and 2014
Background: Statins are effective for the primary and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease (CHD) events. However, studies from the early 2000s have suggested ...
Abstract P1-15-03: Assessing the association of statins with clinical outcomes in women with breast cancer
Abstract P1-15-03: Assessing the association of statins with clinical outcomes in women with breast cancer
Abstract Background: A growing number of studies are claiming lipid-lowering medications (LLMs) primarily statins have anticancer properties to inhibit proliferation...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
A Possible Solution to Statin Noncompliance
A Possible Solution to Statin Noncompliance
Dear Sir/Madam Pakistan is one of the top six countries for Cardiovascular deaths and it is estimated that 4.7 million people will die from Cardiovascular deaths between 2005-2027[...
Investigation of the Statin Paradox in Different Populations of VICs
Investigation of the Statin Paradox in Different Populations of VICs
Abstract While numerous clinical studies have examined the effect of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statin drugs) on calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD), their co...

Back to Top