Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Exploration Risk

View through CrossRef
It is commonly said that mineral exploration is a risky business, but what does that really mean? Although exploration can be financially rewarding, there is a high probability that a single venture will be a failure. Risk is defined as chance of failure or loss and its adverse consequence (i.e., failure or loss). Risk differs from uncertainty in that uncertainty simply means lack of knowledge of the outcome or result, whereas risk involves a loss. Thus, one could be uncertain of an outcome, but not necessarily be at risk of losing something. In risk analysis, two quantities are estimated: the magnitude (severity) of the possible adverse consequence(s), and the likelihood (probability) of occurrence of each consequence. Procedures of risk analysis are well established, if not simple, and are applied in both business and engineering (Aven, 2003; Bárdossy and Fodor, 2004; Davis and Samis, 2006). Mineral exploration is an economic activity involving risk and uncertainty, so risk also must be defined in an economic context in which the extent of the loss is defined. Successful mineral exploration strategy requires identification of some of the risk sources and consideration of them in the decision-making process so that controllable risk can be reduced. It is not uncommon to see recommendations that exploration firms should accept all projects with positive expected monetary values—that is, projects that have a positive economic value after being multiplied by the probability of deposit discovery and subtraction of exploration costs. Clearly, this strategy would be unwise for a firm with limited resources if the chance of failure were significant. Both expected monetary values and the probabilities of various outcomes such as economic failure should be considered in the decision-making process. Because economic return, when measured by net present value, is closely related to the size of mineral deposits, and because deposit sizes can be represented by highly skewed frequency distributions, achieving expected monetary or higher values tends to be a low-probability outcome. This and the typical rareness of mineral deposits are the fundamental reasons for the high risk in mineral exploration.
Title: Exploration Risk
Description:
It is commonly said that mineral exploration is a risky business, but what does that really mean? Although exploration can be financially rewarding, there is a high probability that a single venture will be a failure.
Risk is defined as chance of failure or loss and its adverse consequence (i.
e.
, failure or loss).
Risk differs from uncertainty in that uncertainty simply means lack of knowledge of the outcome or result, whereas risk involves a loss.
Thus, one could be uncertain of an outcome, but not necessarily be at risk of losing something.
In risk analysis, two quantities are estimated: the magnitude (severity) of the possible adverse consequence(s), and the likelihood (probability) of occurrence of each consequence.
Procedures of risk analysis are well established, if not simple, and are applied in both business and engineering (Aven, 2003; Bárdossy and Fodor, 2004; Davis and Samis, 2006).
Mineral exploration is an economic activity involving risk and uncertainty, so risk also must be defined in an economic context in which the extent of the loss is defined.
Successful mineral exploration strategy requires identification of some of the risk sources and consideration of them in the decision-making process so that controllable risk can be reduced.
It is not uncommon to see recommendations that exploration firms should accept all projects with positive expected monetary values—that is, projects that have a positive economic value after being multiplied by the probability of deposit discovery and subtraction of exploration costs.
Clearly, this strategy would be unwise for a firm with limited resources if the chance of failure were significant.
Both expected monetary values and the probabilities of various outcomes such as economic failure should be considered in the decision-making process.
Because economic return, when measured by net present value, is closely related to the size of mineral deposits, and because deposit sizes can be represented by highly skewed frequency distributions, achieving expected monetary or higher values tends to be a low-probability outcome.
This and the typical rareness of mineral deposits are the fundamental reasons for the high risk in mineral exploration.

Related Results

Optimized Exploration Planning
Optimized Exploration Planning
Abstract The process of exploration planning in the oil and gas industry has historically been time-consuming and inefficient with limited information and large unce...
Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Used as an Enabler for Dynamic Risk Management
Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Used as an Enabler for Dynamic Risk Management
Abstract Applying big data, data science, business process automation (BPA) and domain expertise to operational and project risk in the upstream O&G space, will ...
146 IS SURTAVI RISK MODEL A STEP TOWARDS ‘TAVI RISK SCORE’: TIME TO RETHINK?
146 IS SURTAVI RISK MODEL A STEP TOWARDS ‘TAVI RISK SCORE’: TIME TO RETHINK?
Introduction During the design of the SURTAVI trial, a new concept of risk stratification for patients with aortic stenosis, based upon age combined with a fixed ...
Abstract 13915: Comparison of Proteomic CV Risk to Established ASCVD 10-year Risk Decision Points
Abstract 13915: Comparison of Proteomic CV Risk to Established ASCVD 10-year Risk Decision Points
Introduction: The ASCVD pooled cohort equation (PCE) is well-established for CV risk assessment. Decision points for determining treatment plans are low, intermediate a...
The life cycle of the Netherlands’ natural gas exploration: 40 years after Groningen, where are we now?
The life cycle of the Netherlands’ natural gas exploration: 40 years after Groningen, where are we now?
The discovery of the giant Permian Groningen Field in 1959 triggered the main phase of gas exploration in NW Europe. This paper deals with the history and future of natural gas exp...
Risk-Directed Ambulatory Thromboprophylaxis in Lung and Gastrointestinal Cancers
Risk-Directed Ambulatory Thromboprophylaxis in Lung and Gastrointestinal Cancers
ImportanceThromboprophylaxis for individuals receiving systemic anticancer therapies has proven to be effective. Potential to maximize benefits relies on improved risk-directed str...
A Tool for Predicting the Risk of Escalation in Hospital at Home
A Tool for Predicting the Risk of Escalation in Hospital at Home
Importance Hospital at Home (HaH) is an emerging model of acute care delivery that provides hospital-level care in the home. The risk factors for escalation of care from HaH to the...

Back to Top