Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Short article: Distractor interference in focused attention tasks is not mediated by attention capture

View through CrossRef
Distractor stimuli possessing information that is relevant for a task (henceforth, task-relevant distractors) often interfere with task performance. The interference by task-relevant distractors is observed even when distractors are positioned outside the main attentional focus. We investigated whether such interference is due to an attention capture by the distractors. Participants responded to a target colour while ignoring word distractors positioned within (Experiment 1) or outside (Experiments 2 and 3) the attentional focus. The words carried task-relevant information in their colour and personally significant information in their content. Because personally significant information affects performance only when positioned in an attended region, it was used as a marker for the locus of the attentional focus. As expected, when distractors were attended, both task-relevant and personally significant information affected performance. However, when distractors were unattended, only task-relevant information caused interference, suggesting that attention did not shift to the distractors’ location. We discuss possible accounts for interference effects in focused-attention tasks.
Title: Short article: Distractor interference in focused attention tasks is not mediated by attention capture
Description:
Distractor stimuli possessing information that is relevant for a task (henceforth, task-relevant distractors) often interfere with task performance.
The interference by task-relevant distractors is observed even when distractors are positioned outside the main attentional focus.
We investigated whether such interference is due to an attention capture by the distractors.
Participants responded to a target colour while ignoring word distractors positioned within (Experiment 1) or outside (Experiments 2 and 3) the attentional focus.
The words carried task-relevant information in their colour and personally significant information in their content.
Because personally significant information affects performance only when positioned in an attended region, it was used as a marker for the locus of the attentional focus.
As expected, when distractors were attended, both task-relevant and personally significant information affected performance.
However, when distractors were unattended, only task-relevant information caused interference, suggesting that attention did not shift to the distractors’ location.
We discuss possible accounts for interference effects in focused-attention tasks.

Related Results

Neural Evidence for Feature-based Distractor Inhibition
Neural Evidence for Feature-based Distractor Inhibition
Interference from a salient distractor is typically reduced when the appearance of the distractor follows either spatial or feature-based regularities. While there is a growing bod...
Learned oculomotor avoidance during strong target guidance
Learned oculomotor avoidance during strong target guidance
Visual attention is guided toward behaviorally-relevant objects by target ‘templates’ stored in visual memory. Visual attention also is guided away from nontarget distractors by le...
Target templates and the time course of distractor location learning
Target templates and the time course of distractor location learning
When searching for a shape target, colour distractors typically capture our attention. Capture is smaller when observers search for a fixed target that allows for a feature-specifi...
How visual eccentricity shapes conflict via target and distractor processing in the Simon task
How visual eccentricity shapes conflict via target and distractor processing in the Simon task
Abstract The visual Simon task is widely used to study action control in the presence of conflicting target and distractor information. However, it is unclear how...
Conceptual and Grammatical Fields: Speech Errors Revisited
Conceptual and Grammatical Fields: Speech Errors Revisited
This paper reports a study of the effects of semantic and grammatical interference basing on the analysis of about 300 Russian speech errors (slips of the tongue) of two kinds: con...
Eager inhibition, lagging enhancement: The time course of selective attention
Eager inhibition, lagging enhancement: The time course of selective attention
Foreknowledge of target features biases attention toward those features even before search begins, indicating proactive activation of the target template. However, whether foreknow...
Spatial flexibility of distractor suppression in the tactile modality
Spatial flexibility of distractor suppression in the tactile modality
ABSTRACT Object sensing and manipulation rely on the somatosensory system’s ability to relay relevant information about a skin location encoding tactile information...
Drawn to distraction: Anxiety impairs neural suppression of known distractor featuresin visual search
Drawn to distraction: Anxiety impairs neural suppression of known distractor featuresin visual search
When searching for a target, it is possible to suppress the features of a known distractor. This suppression may occur early, preventing distractor processing altogether, or only a...

Back to Top