Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Target templates and the time course of distractor location learning
View through CrossRef
When searching for a shape target, colour distractors typically capture our attention. Capture is smaller when observers search for a fixed target that allows for a feature-specific target template compared to a varying shape singleton target. Capture is also reduced when observers learn to predict the likely distractor location. We investigated how the precision of the target template modulates distractor location learning in an additional singleton search task. As observers are less prone to capture with a feature-specific target, we assumed that distractor location learning is less beneficial and therefore less pronounced than with a mixed-feature target. Hierarchical Bayesian parameter estimation was used to fit fine-grained distractor location learning curves. A model-based analysis of the time course of distractor location learning revealed an effect on the asymptotic performance level: when searching for a fixed-feature target, the asymptotic distractor cost indicated smaller distractor interference than with a mixed-feature target. Although interference was reduced for distractors at the high-probability location in both tasks, asymptotic distractor suppression was less pronounced with fixed-feature compared to mixed-feature targets. We conclude that with a more precise target template less distractor location learning is required, likely because the distractor dimension is down-weighted and its salience signal reduced.
Title: Target templates and the time course of distractor location learning
Description:
When searching for a shape target, colour distractors typically capture our attention.
Capture is smaller when observers search for a fixed target that allows for a feature-specific target template compared to a varying shape singleton target.
Capture is also reduced when observers learn to predict the likely distractor location.
We investigated how the precision of the target template modulates distractor location learning in an additional singleton search task.
As observers are less prone to capture with a feature-specific target, we assumed that distractor location learning is less beneficial and therefore less pronounced than with a mixed-feature target.
Hierarchical Bayesian parameter estimation was used to fit fine-grained distractor location learning curves.
A model-based analysis of the time course of distractor location learning revealed an effect on the asymptotic performance level: when searching for a fixed-feature target, the asymptotic distractor cost indicated smaller distractor interference than with a mixed-feature target.
Although interference was reduced for distractors at the high-probability location in both tasks, asymptotic distractor suppression was less pronounced with fixed-feature compared to mixed-feature targets.
We conclude that with a more precise target template less distractor location learning is required, likely because the distractor dimension is down-weighted and its salience signal reduced.
Related Results
Neural Evidence for Feature-based Distractor Inhibition
Neural Evidence for Feature-based Distractor Inhibition
Interference from a salient distractor is typically reduced when the appearance of the distractor follows either spatial or feature-based regularities. While there is a growing bod...
Learned oculomotor avoidance during strong target guidance
Learned oculomotor avoidance during strong target guidance
Visual attention is guided toward behaviorally-relevant objects by target ‘templates’ stored in visual memory. Visual attention also is guided away from nontarget distractors by le...
How visual eccentricity shapes conflict via target and distractor processing in the Simon task
How visual eccentricity shapes conflict via target and distractor processing in the Simon task
Abstract
The visual Simon task is widely used to study action control in the presence of conflicting target and distractor information. However, it is unclear how...
Eager inhibition, lagging enhancement: The time course of selective attention
Eager inhibition, lagging enhancement: The time course of selective attention
Foreknowledge of target features biases attention toward those features even before search begins, indicating proactive activation of the target template. However, whether foreknow...
Probabilistic rejection templates in visual working memory
Probabilistic rejection templates in visual working memory
Our interactions with the visual world are guided by attention and visual working memory. Things that we look for and those we ignore are stored as templates that reflect our goals...
Representational Competition of Spatially and Temporally Overlapped Target and Distractor
Representational Competition of Spatially and Temporally Overlapped Target and Distractor
Abstract
Representational competition occurs when a task-relevant target stimulus and a distractor overlap in space and time. Given limited neural resources, it is expe...
Spatial flexibility of distractor suppression in the tactile modality
Spatial flexibility of distractor suppression in the tactile modality
ABSTRACT
Object sensing and manipulation rely on the somatosensory system’s ability to relay relevant information about a skin location encoding tactile information...
Assessment of distractor efficiency of MCQS in item analysis.
Assessment of distractor efficiency of MCQS in item analysis.
Objective: To assess the distractor efficiency of the multiple-choice questions and find out the structural flaws in the items that negatively impact the distractor efficiency. Stu...

