Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Conservative Management Versus Early Cholecystectomy for Gallstone Disease: A Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

View through CrossRef
ABSTRACTObjectiveWhile most individuals with gallstone disease remain asymptomatic, symptoms of gallstone disease range from biliary pain to acute cholecystitis. Surgery is a popular choice of treatment, but evidence has also suggested conservative management as a safe and viable approach. We aim to investigate the evidence on conservative management versus early cholecystectomy for the management of gallstone disease.MethodsWe searched electronic databases to retrieve and include all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that analyzed the efficacy and safety of conservative management versus early cholecystectomy in the management of gallstone disease. The revised Cochrane “Risk of bias” tool for randomized trials (RoB 2.0) was used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies. We calculated risk ratios (RR) along with the 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for all the outcomes. The random‐effects model was used in our analysis.ResultsA total of 11 RCTs were included in our meta‐analysis. We found no statistically significant difference between conservative management and early cholecystectomy regarding the incidence of total intraoperative complications (RR 0.45; 95% CI: 0.14–1.42), total postoperative complications (RR 0.85; 95% CI: 0.48–1.50), total surgical complications (RR 0.68; 95% CI: 0.43–1.10), and mortality (RR 1.24; 95% CI: 0.81–1.89). The conservative management group was associated with a statistically significant higher incidence of total biliary complications (RR 3.63; 95% CI: 2.07–6.37), biliary colic (RR 2.75; 95% CI: 1.23–6.15), and common bile duct (CBD) stones (RR 3.96; 95% CI: 1.46–10.71). There was no difference in the incidence of biliary pancreatitis (RR 1.46; 95% CI: 0.49–4.35) and cholangitis (RR 1.52; 95% CI: 0.47–4.89).ConclusionAccording to our meta‐analysis, conservative management offers no benefit over early cholecystectomy for gallstone disease; it increases the incidence of biliary complications in patients with gallstone disease. More studies are needed to better ascertain the role of conservative management in the management of gallstone disease.
Title: Conservative Management Versus Early Cholecystectomy for Gallstone Disease: A Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Description:
ABSTRACTObjectiveWhile most individuals with gallstone disease remain asymptomatic, symptoms of gallstone disease range from biliary pain to acute cholecystitis.
Surgery is a popular choice of treatment, but evidence has also suggested conservative management as a safe and viable approach.
We aim to investigate the evidence on conservative management versus early cholecystectomy for the management of gallstone disease.
MethodsWe searched electronic databases to retrieve and include all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that analyzed the efficacy and safety of conservative management versus early cholecystectomy in the management of gallstone disease.
The revised Cochrane “Risk of bias” tool for randomized trials (RoB 2.
0) was used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies.
We calculated risk ratios (RR) along with the 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for all the outcomes.
The random‐effects model was used in our analysis.
ResultsA total of 11 RCTs were included in our meta‐analysis.
We found no statistically significant difference between conservative management and early cholecystectomy regarding the incidence of total intraoperative complications (RR 0.
45; 95% CI: 0.
14–1.
42), total postoperative complications (RR 0.
85; 95% CI: 0.
48–1.
50), total surgical complications (RR 0.
68; 95% CI: 0.
43–1.
10), and mortality (RR 1.
24; 95% CI: 0.
81–1.
89).
The conservative management group was associated with a statistically significant higher incidence of total biliary complications (RR 3.
63; 95% CI: 2.
07–6.
37), biliary colic (RR 2.
75; 95% CI: 1.
23–6.
15), and common bile duct (CBD) stones (RR 3.
96; 95% CI: 1.
46–10.
71).
There was no difference in the incidence of biliary pancreatitis (RR 1.
46; 95% CI: 0.
49–4.
35) and cholangitis (RR 1.
52; 95% CI: 0.
47–4.
89).
ConclusionAccording to our meta‐analysis, conservative management offers no benefit over early cholecystectomy for gallstone disease; it increases the incidence of biliary complications in patients with gallstone disease.
More studies are needed to better ascertain the role of conservative management in the management of gallstone disease.

Related Results

Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Ovarian Cancer
Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Ovarian Cancer
Abstract Introduction Although the efficacy of PD-L1 blockade has been evaluated in analyses that combine pharmacologically distinct antibodies, the specific efficacy and safety of...
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conservative management for adults with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstones: the C-GALL RCT
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conservative management for adults with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstones: the C-GALL RCT
Background Gallstone disease is a common gastrointestinal disorder in industrialised societies. The prevalence of gallstones in the adult population is estimated to be approximatel...
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract Introduction Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...
The difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a narrative review
The difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a narrative review
Abstract Background/purpose Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is one of the most commonly performed general surgical procedures. Difficult laparoscopi...
LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY;
LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY;
Objectives: Toevaluate the outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy as compared with open cholecystectomy in compensated cirrhotic patients. Study Design: Prospective randomized stu...
EGS P16 Management of Acute Gallstone disease at an urban acute Trust during the pandemic
EGS P16 Management of Acute Gallstone disease at an urban acute Trust during the pandemic
Abstract Background Acute gallstone disease is a surgical emergency. Management has evolved over the years with emphasis on earl...
Rethinking Anticoagulation in Kidney Disease and Kidney Transplantation
Rethinking Anticoagulation in Kidney Disease and Kidney Transplantation
BackgroundA clinical dilemma exists in patients with CKD, ESKD, and after kidney transplantation, as they face concurrent risks of both thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications...
Current Management of Acute Gallstone Pancreatitis: Narrative Review Article
Current Management of Acute Gallstone Pancreatitis: Narrative Review Article
Acute gallstone pancreatitis is the most common cause of acute pancreatitis, and it is divided into mild and severe forms. The management of acute gallstone pancreatitis will initi...

Back to Top