Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Comparison of PRESERFLO Implantation Techniques using a New Small Posterior Incision versus a Standard Anterior Peritomy

View through CrossRef
Purpose: To compare the standard implantation technique of a new ab externo microshunt (PRESERFLO) to a posterior technique with a small incision. The standard anterior approach (A) requires a relatively large, 6-8 mm perilimbal peritomy. In contrast, the posterior approach (P) involves only a 2-3 mm snip incision 2 mm posterior to the limbus. Methods: Charts of 126 PRESERFLO patients (54 A and 72 P) were retrospectively analyzed. Follow-up was 270 days. We compared the surgical time, intraocular pressure (IOP), number of medications, and complications. Results: The preoperative IOP in A was 21.8±8.5 mmHg and 23.9±8.1 mmHg in P (p=0.08). The surgical time for A was 26±0.8 minutes and 10±0.4 minutes for B (p<0.001). Following a low-pressure phase during the first week, A and P had an IOP value of 10.8±5.9 mmHg and 10.6±4.5 mmHg at 30 days, respectively (p=0.62). IOPs remained at this level throughout the study (all intra-group p> 0.08). There were no inter-group differences in IOP at any visit (all p-values > 0.3). Patients in A and P took 3.2 ± 1.3 and 3.3 ± 1.0 pressure-lowering medications at baseline, respectively (p=0.4). These values declined to 0.2 ± 0.6 in A and 0.3 ± 0.7 in P at 270 days. Both groups had a similar number of revisions (13 (10.3%) versus 10 (7.9%, p=0.14)) and complications (26 (20.8%) versus 31 (24.6%, all p>0.25). Conclusion: The posterior PRESERFLO insertion technique was 2.6 times faster than the standard anterior technique and yielded similar results with a large reduction in IOP and medications and a safety profile favorable over traditional filtering surgery.
Title: Comparison of PRESERFLO Implantation Techniques using a New Small Posterior Incision versus a Standard Anterior Peritomy
Description:
Purpose: To compare the standard implantation technique of a new ab externo microshunt (PRESERFLO) to a posterior technique with a small incision.
The standard anterior approach (A) requires a relatively large, 6-8 mm perilimbal peritomy.
In contrast, the posterior approach (P) involves only a 2-3 mm snip incision 2 mm posterior to the limbus.
Methods: Charts of 126 PRESERFLO patients (54 A and 72 P) were retrospectively analyzed.
Follow-up was 270 days.
We compared the surgical time, intraocular pressure (IOP), number of medications, and complications.
Results: The preoperative IOP in A was 21.
8±8.
5 mmHg and 23.
9±8.
1 mmHg in P (p=0.
08).
The surgical time for A was 26±0.
8 minutes and 10±0.
4 minutes for B (p<0.
001).
Following a low-pressure phase during the first week, A and P had an IOP value of 10.
8±5.
9 mmHg and 10.
6±4.
5 mmHg at 30 days, respectively (p=0.
62).
IOPs remained at this level throughout the study (all intra-group p> 0.
08).
There were no inter-group differences in IOP at any visit (all p-values > 0.
3).
Patients in A and P took 3.
2 ± 1.
3 and 3.
3 ± 1.
0 pressure-lowering medications at baseline, respectively (p=0.
4).
These values declined to 0.
2 ± 0.
6 in A and 0.
3 ± 0.
7 in P at 270 days.
Both groups had a similar number of revisions (13 (10.
3%) versus 10 (7.
9%, p=0.
14)) and complications (26 (20.
8%) versus 31 (24.
6%, all p>0.
25).
Conclusion: The posterior PRESERFLO insertion technique was 2.
6 times faster than the standard anterior technique and yielded similar results with a large reduction in IOP and medications and a safety profile favorable over traditional filtering surgery.

Related Results

Bikini Incision Modification of the Direct Anterior Approach
Bikini Incision Modification of the Direct Anterior Approach
Background: Although the direct anterior approach (DAA) represents an intermuscular and internervous approach to total hip arthroplasty (THA), it did not reach global a...
Standard Anterior Peritomy versus a Small Posterior Incision for the Implantation of the PRESERFLO Microshunt
Standard Anterior Peritomy versus a Small Posterior Incision for the Implantation of the PRESERFLO Microshunt
Abstract Purpose: This study aimed at comparing two approaches for the implantation of PRESERFLO microshunts. The standardized approach (A) is an anterior approach that nec...
Changes in Tissue pH and Temperature after Incision Indicate Acidosis May Contribute to Postoperative Pain
Changes in Tissue pH and Temperature after Incision Indicate Acidosis May Contribute to Postoperative Pain
Background Incisional pain is a common form of acute pain. Previously, the authors studied persistent pain behaviors caused by incisions, using animal models for postop...
Retinitis Pigmentosa
Retinitis Pigmentosa
In studying the cases with typical and atypical pigmentary degeneration of the retina we strived to analyse in the clinical material all ophthalmoscopic and ocular changes together...
Staphylococcus Capitus Blebitis Following Preserflo MicroShunt Implantation
Staphylococcus Capitus Blebitis Following Preserflo MicroShunt Implantation
Purpose: To report a case of early-onset blebitis following Preserflo MicroShunt implantation. Patients and Methods: Case ...
Stability of anterior segments in patients with moderate and high myopia one year after SMILE
Stability of anterior segments in patients with moderate and high myopia one year after SMILE
Abstract Background: SMILE is one of the most leading-edge corneal refractive surgery.In our study, we aim to investigate the stability of anterior segments in patients wit...

Back to Top