Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The transferability of laparoscopic and open surgical skills to robotic surgery
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background
Within the last decades, robotic surgery has gained popularity. Most robotic surgeons have changed their main surgical activity from open or laparoscopic without prior formal robotic training. With the current practice, it is of great interest to know whether there is a transfer of surgical skills. In visualization, motion scaling, and freedom of motion, robotic surgery resembles open surgery far more than laparoscopic surgery. Therefore, our hypothesis is that open-trained surgeons have more transfer of surgical skills to robotic surgery, compared to surgeons trained in laparoscopy.
Methods
Thirty-six surgically inexperienced medical students were randomized into three groups for intensive simulation training in an assigned modality: open surgery, laparoscopy, or robot-assisted laparoscopy. The training period was, for all study subjects, followed by performing a robot-assisted bowel anastomosis in a pig model. As surrogate markers of surgical quality, the anastomoses were tested for resistance to pressure, and video recordings of the procedure were evaluated by two blinded expert robotic surgeons, using a global rating scale of robotic operative performance (Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS)).
Results
The mean leak pressure of bowel anastomosis was 36.25 (7.62–64.89) mmHg in the laparoscopic training group and 69.01 (28.02–109.99) mmHg in the open surgery group, and the mean leak pressure for the robotic training group was 108.45 (74.96–141.94) mmHg. The same pattern was found with GEARS as surrogate markers of surgical quality. GEARS score was 15.71 (12.37–19.04) in the laparoscopic training group, 18.14 (14.70–21.58) in the open surgery group, and 22.04 (19.29–24.79) in the robotic training group. In comparison with the laparoscopic training group, the robotic training group had a statistically higher leak pressure (p = 0.0015) and GEARS score (p = 0.0023). No significant difference, for neither leak pressure nor GEARS, between the open and the robotic training group.
Conclusion
In our study, training in open surgery was superior to training in laparoscopy when transitioning to robotic surgery in a simulation setting performed by surgically naive study subjects.
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Title: The transferability of laparoscopic and open surgical skills to robotic surgery
Description:
Abstract
Background
Within the last decades, robotic surgery has gained popularity.
Most robotic surgeons have changed their main surgical activity from open or laparoscopic without prior formal robotic training.
With the current practice, it is of great interest to know whether there is a transfer of surgical skills.
In visualization, motion scaling, and freedom of motion, robotic surgery resembles open surgery far more than laparoscopic surgery.
Therefore, our hypothesis is that open-trained surgeons have more transfer of surgical skills to robotic surgery, compared to surgeons trained in laparoscopy.
Methods
Thirty-six surgically inexperienced medical students were randomized into three groups for intensive simulation training in an assigned modality: open surgery, laparoscopy, or robot-assisted laparoscopy.
The training period was, for all study subjects, followed by performing a robot-assisted bowel anastomosis in a pig model.
As surrogate markers of surgical quality, the anastomoses were tested for resistance to pressure, and video recordings of the procedure were evaluated by two blinded expert robotic surgeons, using a global rating scale of robotic operative performance (Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS)).
Results
The mean leak pressure of bowel anastomosis was 36.
25 (7.
62–64.
89) mmHg in the laparoscopic training group and 69.
01 (28.
02–109.
99) mmHg in the open surgery group, and the mean leak pressure for the robotic training group was 108.
45 (74.
96–141.
94) mmHg.
The same pattern was found with GEARS as surrogate markers of surgical quality.
GEARS score was 15.
71 (12.
37–19.
04) in the laparoscopic training group, 18.
14 (14.
70–21.
58) in the open surgery group, and 22.
04 (19.
29–24.
79) in the robotic training group.
In comparison with the laparoscopic training group, the robotic training group had a statistically higher leak pressure (p = 0.
0015) and GEARS score (p = 0.
0023).
No significant difference, for neither leak pressure nor GEARS, between the open and the robotic training group.
Conclusion
In our study, training in open surgery was superior to training in laparoscopy when transitioning to robotic surgery in a simulation setting performed by surgically naive study subjects.
Related Results
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Abstarct
Introduction
Isolated brain hydatid disease (BHD) is an extremely rare form of echinococcosis. A prompt and timely diagnosis is a crucial step in disease management. This ...
Implementation of a Robotic Surgical Program in Gynaecological Oncology and Comparison with Prior Laparoscopic Series
Implementation of a Robotic Surgical Program in Gynaecological Oncology and Comparison with Prior Laparoscopic Series
Background. Robotic surgery in gynaecological oncology is a rapidly developing field as it offers several technical advantages over conventional laparoscopy. An audit was performed...
A <span aria-describedby="tippy-18">Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Robot-Assisted and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery
A <span aria-describedby="tippy-18">Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Robot-Assisted and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery
Background: Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery robot-assisted surgical system has gained significant popularity over open and laparoscopic interventions. However, given its high c...
A comparative study of robotic and laparoscopic radical resection for locally advanced gastric cancer on the dissection of lymph nodes in the upper pancreas and the effect on the pancreas
A comparative study of robotic and laparoscopic radical resection for locally advanced gastric cancer on the dissection of lymph nodes in the upper pancreas and the effect on the pancreas
Abstract
Purpose By comparing the short-term clinical outcome of robotic gastrectomy versus laparoscopic gastrectomy in D2 radical gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric ...
Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Surgery in Rectal Cancer Compared with Open and Laparoscopic Surgery
Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Surgery in Rectal Cancer Compared with Open and Laparoscopic Surgery
With increasing trends for the adoption of robotic surgery, many centers are considering changing their practices from open or laparoscopic to robot-assisted surgery for rectal can...
The Robotic Approach in Rectal Cancer
The Robotic Approach in Rectal Cancer
Since a robotic surgical system was developed in the early 1990s and the first robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy was reported in 2001, robotic surgery has spread in many surgi...
Comparison between laparoscopic and Open surgery in appendectomy and return-to-work
Comparison between laparoscopic and Open surgery in appendectomy and return-to-work
Abstract
Background: Laparoscopic appendectomy has rapidly become established as the popular alternative to open appendectomy, it has a safety profile better than open proc...
Outcome of laparoscopy assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy at the department of gastrointestinal surgery, Viet Duc University Hospital
Outcome of laparoscopy assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy at the department of gastrointestinal surgery, Viet Duc University Hospital
Abstract
Introduction: Laparoscopic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy is a complex surgical procedure associated with a high rate of complications, particularly those arising from...

