Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Prospectus Formats and Shelf Registration

View through CrossRef
Abstract This chapter discusses prospectus formats and shelf registration. It reveals that the new EU prospectus rules introduce more flexibility and efficiency in the use of different prospectus formats. Different options for formats overlap even more than in the past and their use will depend on the frequency of issuances and instruments issued. The overlap between the uniform registration document (URD) and simplified prospectus will leave issuers to choose what best suits their needs, depending on how often, through which instruments and from which investors issuers seek to raise capital in future and the timing of financial disclosures. The cost of keeping an URD up-to-date for more frequent issuers and issuers requiring both equity and debt must be balanced with the utility of having different equity and debt securities registered. The option of filing annual and half-yearly reports under the Transparency Directive in the form of a URD may reduce costs for certain issuers. According to this chapter, the ‘frequent issuer status’ may in practice not offer much improvement on the service already provided by certain competent authorities, also considering the advance notice requirement. The chapter concludes that there is room for improving the URD system in future.
Title: Prospectus Formats and Shelf Registration
Description:
Abstract This chapter discusses prospectus formats and shelf registration.
It reveals that the new EU prospectus rules introduce more flexibility and efficiency in the use of different prospectus formats.
Different options for formats overlap even more than in the past and their use will depend on the frequency of issuances and instruments issued.
The overlap between the uniform registration document (URD) and simplified prospectus will leave issuers to choose what best suits their needs, depending on how often, through which instruments and from which investors issuers seek to raise capital in future and the timing of financial disclosures.
The cost of keeping an URD up-to-date for more frequent issuers and issuers requiring both equity and debt must be balanced with the utility of having different equity and debt securities registered.
The option of filing annual and half-yearly reports under the Transparency Directive in the form of a URD may reduce costs for certain issuers.
According to this chapter, the ‘frequent issuer status’ may in practice not offer much improvement on the service already provided by certain competent authorities, also considering the advance notice requirement.
The chapter concludes that there is room for improving the URD system in future.

Related Results

Prospectus Liability under the EU Prospectus Regulation
Prospectus Liability under the EU Prospectus Regulation
Abstract This chapter explores the complexities of the European rules governing prospectus liability under the EU Prospectus Regulation. It highlights the efforts to...
The Prospectus Regulation and Other EU Legislation
The Prospectus Regulation and Other EU Legislation
Abstract This chapter provides an overview of how the scope and application of the Prospectus Regulation is affected by other EU laws. It reveals that the content an...
Ireland
Ireland
Abstract The present chapter seeks to analyse the Irish prospectus liability regime and assess its strengths and weaknesses. With the Companies Act 2014, Ireland now...
Thermal Regime of George VI Ice Shelf, Antarctic Peninsula (Abstract)
Thermal Regime of George VI Ice Shelf, Antarctic Peninsula (Abstract)
New data on the thermal regime of George VI Ice Shelf have been obtained by thermistor chains installed through the use of a hot-water drill. Twenty thermistors are used at each si...
Prospectus Liability in Europe: The Relevant Breach of Duties
Prospectus Liability in Europe: The Relevant Breach of Duties
Abstract This article focuses on the relevant breach of duties under art 11 of the Prospectus Regulation (EU) 1129/2017, which provides only few elements of the priv...
Reporting of Retrospective Registration in Clinical Trial Publications: a Cross-Sectional Study of German Trials
Reporting of Retrospective Registration in Clinical Trial Publications: a Cross-Sectional Study of German Trials
Objective: Prospective registration has been widely implemented and accepted as a best practice in clinical research, but retrospective registration is still commonly found. We ass...
Public Procedures for State Registration
Public Procedures for State Registration
The paper reviews the types of state registration carried out to meet private and public needs, as well as the content of the relevant administrative procedures. The author substan...

Back to Top