Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Prospectus Liability under the EU Prospectus Regulation
View through CrossRef
Abstract
This chapter explores the complexities of the European rules governing prospectus liability under the EU Prospectus Regulation. It highlights the efforts to harmonize prospectus rules across European jurisdictions, while also underlying the paradoxical choice by the European legislator to leave enforcement of these rules to Member States. To grasp when prospectus liability may be invoked, this chapter examines the key disclosure obligations required by the Prospectus Regulation. It further addresses the concise civil liability framework set forth by the Prospectus Regulation and the efforts by the CJEU to provide clarifications in this regard. Ultimately, this chapter demonstrates that prospectus liability remains largely a Member States’ matter, creating significant challenges, particularly in terms of investor protection and legal uncertainty for issuers. It concludes by questioning the absence of a unified European prospectus liability framework at the European level, especially in light of other capital market instruments such as MiCAR and the UCITS Directive, which expressly establish comprehensive liability frameworks.
Oxford University Press
Title: Prospectus Liability under the EU Prospectus Regulation
Description:
Abstract
This chapter explores the complexities of the European rules governing prospectus liability under the EU Prospectus Regulation.
It highlights the efforts to harmonize prospectus rules across European jurisdictions, while also underlying the paradoxical choice by the European legislator to leave enforcement of these rules to Member States.
To grasp when prospectus liability may be invoked, this chapter examines the key disclosure obligations required by the Prospectus Regulation.
It further addresses the concise civil liability framework set forth by the Prospectus Regulation and the efforts by the CJEU to provide clarifications in this regard.
Ultimately, this chapter demonstrates that prospectus liability remains largely a Member States’ matter, creating significant challenges, particularly in terms of investor protection and legal uncertainty for issuers.
It concludes by questioning the absence of a unified European prospectus liability framework at the European level, especially in light of other capital market instruments such as MiCAR and the UCITS Directive, which expressly establish comprehensive liability frameworks.
Related Results
Penerapan Prinsip Vicarious Liability dalam Pertanggungjawaban Perseroan Terbatas
Penerapan Prinsip Vicarious Liability dalam Pertanggungjawaban Perseroan Terbatas
AbstractA limited liability company is a legal subject capable of being responsible for the risks in carrying out its business. The principle of vicarious liability is the basis of...
United States
United States
Abstract
This chapter reviews the US regulatory regime governing prospectus liability for securities offerings. Prospectus liability in the United States generally a...
The Prospectus Regulation and Other EU Legislation
The Prospectus Regulation and Other EU Legislation
Abstract
This chapter provides an overview of how the scope and application of the Prospectus Regulation is affected by other EU laws. It reveals that the content an...
Luxembourg
Luxembourg
Abstract
Luxembourg is a civil law country and a founding member of the European Union. Being a civil law country implies that courts place a great emphasis on statu...
The Principles of European Tort Law and Product Liability
The Principles of European Tort Law and Product Liability
Abstract
The authors of the Principles of European Tort Law (PETL) did not intend to regulate in detail the strict liability of a manufacturer for damage caused by a...

