Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Prospectus Liability under the EU Prospectus Regulation

View through CrossRef
Abstract This chapter explores the complexities of the European rules governing prospectus liability under the EU Prospectus Regulation. It highlights the efforts to harmonize prospectus rules across European jurisdictions, while also underlying the paradoxical choice by the European legislator to leave enforcement of these rules to Member States. To grasp when prospectus liability may be invoked, this chapter examines the key disclosure obligations required by the Prospectus Regulation. It further addresses the concise civil liability framework set forth by the Prospectus Regulation and the efforts by the CJEU to provide clarifications in this regard. Ultimately, this chapter demonstrates that prospectus liability remains largely a Member States’ matter, creating significant challenges, particularly in terms of investor protection and legal uncertainty for issuers. It concludes by questioning the absence of a unified European prospectus liability framework at the European level, especially in light of other capital market instruments such as MiCAR and the UCITS Directive, which expressly establish comprehensive liability frameworks.
Title: Prospectus Liability under the EU Prospectus Regulation
Description:
Abstract This chapter explores the complexities of the European rules governing prospectus liability under the EU Prospectus Regulation.
It highlights the efforts to harmonize prospectus rules across European jurisdictions, while also underlying the paradoxical choice by the European legislator to leave enforcement of these rules to Member States.
To grasp when prospectus liability may be invoked, this chapter examines the key disclosure obligations required by the Prospectus Regulation.
It further addresses the concise civil liability framework set forth by the Prospectus Regulation and the efforts by the CJEU to provide clarifications in this regard.
Ultimately, this chapter demonstrates that prospectus liability remains largely a Member States’ matter, creating significant challenges, particularly in terms of investor protection and legal uncertainty for issuers.
It concludes by questioning the absence of a unified European prospectus liability framework at the European level, especially in light of other capital market instruments such as MiCAR and the UCITS Directive, which expressly establish comprehensive liability frameworks.

Related Results

Penerapan Prinsip Vicarious Liability dalam Pertanggungjawaban Perseroan Terbatas
Penerapan Prinsip Vicarious Liability dalam Pertanggungjawaban Perseroan Terbatas
AbstractA limited liability company is a legal subject capable of being responsible for the risks in carrying out its business. The principle of vicarious liability is the basis of...
Italy
Italy
Abstract This chapter examines prospectus liability in Italy. The scope of Italian prospectus regulation and liability extends beyond the framework of the EU Prospec...
United States
United States
Abstract This chapter reviews the US regulatory regime governing prospectus liability for securities offerings. Prospectus liability in the United States generally a...
Ireland
Ireland
Abstract The present chapter seeks to analyse the Irish prospectus liability regime and assess its strengths and weaknesses. With the Companies Act 2014, Ireland now...
The Prospectus Regulation and Other EU Legislation
The Prospectus Regulation and Other EU Legislation
Abstract This chapter provides an overview of how the scope and application of the Prospectus Regulation is affected by other EU laws. It reveals that the content an...
France
France
Abstract This chapter deals with prospectus liability under French law and points out that there is no specific liability regime dedicated to misleading, incomplete,...
Luxembourg
Luxembourg
Abstract Luxembourg is a civil law country and a founding member of the European Union. Being a civil law country implies that courts place a great emphasis on statu...
The Principles of European Tort Law and Product Liability
The Principles of European Tort Law and Product Liability
Abstract The authors of the Principles of European Tort Law (PETL) did not intend to regulate in detail the strict liability of a manufacturer for damage caused by a...

Back to Top