Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Enforcement Systems – Differences and Similarities
View through CrossRef
Abstract
In modern civil procedural law, there are different organizational structures of national civil enforcement systems.
According to the principle of national procedural autonomy, each state regulates the enforcement procedure independently. Because of this, it is very difficult to talk about special systems for the civil enforcement of court decisions and other judicial or non-judicial enforceable titles at the macro level. The main reason for this is the fact that the matter of enforcement procedural law was neglected for a long period of time, and the harmonization of the enforcement procedure only began to be considered in the middle of the XIX-th century.
However, in general, the International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law speaks of the existence of four systems for the enforcement of court decisions and other judicial or non-judicial enforceable titles, namely: 1) enforcement of decisions by courts, 2) enforcement of decisions by private enforcement bodies (bailiff system of enforcement), 3) mixed systems of enforcement and 4) administrative systems for enforcement.
The system for the enforcement of decisions and other judicial or non-judicial enforceable titles by courts without exceptions is specific to the Anglo-American procedural circle (common law system), while in the Romanian-German procedural circle of the civil law system the enforcement of decisions and other judicial or non-judicial enforceable titles can be under the competence of the courts or under the competence of bailiffs, although combined models can also be encountered. In the Scandinavian procedural circle as a part of the civil law system, is dominant the system of enforcement of decisions by private enforcement bodies or the administrative system of enforcement.
The aim of this paper is to perceive the similarities and differences between national enforcement systems analyzed at the macro level. To achieve this goal, the comparative method and the analysis method will be used.
Title: Enforcement Systems – Differences and Similarities
Description:
Abstract
In modern civil procedural law, there are different organizational structures of national civil enforcement systems.
According to the principle of national procedural autonomy, each state regulates the enforcement procedure independently.
Because of this, it is very difficult to talk about special systems for the civil enforcement of court decisions and other judicial or non-judicial enforceable titles at the macro level.
The main reason for this is the fact that the matter of enforcement procedural law was neglected for a long period of time, and the harmonization of the enforcement procedure only began to be considered in the middle of the XIX-th century.
However, in general, the International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law speaks of the existence of four systems for the enforcement of court decisions and other judicial or non-judicial enforceable titles, namely: 1) enforcement of decisions by courts, 2) enforcement of decisions by private enforcement bodies (bailiff system of enforcement), 3) mixed systems of enforcement and 4) administrative systems for enforcement.
The system for the enforcement of decisions and other judicial or non-judicial enforceable titles by courts without exceptions is specific to the Anglo-American procedural circle (common law system), while in the Romanian-German procedural circle of the civil law system the enforcement of decisions and other judicial or non-judicial enforceable titles can be under the competence of the courts or under the competence of bailiffs, although combined models can also be encountered.
In the Scandinavian procedural circle as a part of the civil law system, is dominant the system of enforcement of decisions by private enforcement bodies or the administrative system of enforcement.
The aim of this paper is to perceive the similarities and differences between national enforcement systems analyzed at the macro level.
To achieve this goal, the comparative method and the analysis method will be used.
Related Results
Punishing Polluters: Trends, Local Practice, and Influences, and Their Implications for Administrative Law Enforcement in China
Punishing Polluters: Trends, Local Practice, and Influences, and Their Implications for Administrative Law Enforcement in China
Scholars and politicians often complain about how weak administrative law enforcement is in China. To better understand the challenges in law enforcement, as well as variation in a...
Perbandingan Kosa Kata Antara Bahasa Dentong dan Bahasa Duri (Sebuah Tinjauan Linguistik)
Perbandingan Kosa Kata Antara Bahasa Dentong dan Bahasa Duri (Sebuah Tinjauan Linguistik)
The problems of this research are (1) the relationship of similarities and similarities in the vocabulary of Dentong and Duri languages (2) the relationship between sound and mea...
Ewolucja zakresu ograniczeń egzekucji sądowej a cel postępowania egzekucyjnego
Ewolucja zakresu ograniczeń egzekucji sądowej a cel postępowania egzekucyjnego
This study is devoted to the analysis of mutual relations between the evolution of the scope of limitations (restrictions) of judicial enforcement and the purpose of the enforcemen...
Co-producing improvements in enforcement agencies efficiency to tackle illegal fishing
Co-producing improvements in enforcement agencies efficiency to tackle illegal fishing
Illegal fishing can undermine the sustainability of fisheries globally, threatening livelihoods and marine ecosystems. Traditional enforcement strategies struggle to cope with the ...
Digital Enforcement Proceedings
Digital Enforcement Proceedings
One of the directions of digitalization is the introduction of digital enforcement proceedings. The paper analyzes the specifics of digital enforcement proceedings in relation to t...
Professional ethics in law enforcement agencies
Professional ethics in law enforcement agencies
The article explains what the ethics of law enforcement agencies are. Having analyzed the concept of law enforcement ethics, it was determined that it is a type of professional eth...
Oczywista niecelowość wszczęcia postępowania egzekucyjnego w przypadku zgonu dłużnika przed wszczęciem tego postępowania
Oczywista niecelowość wszczęcia postępowania egzekucyjnego w przypadku zgonu dłużnika przed wszczęciem tego postępowania
Obvious Aimlessness of Initiating Enforcement Proceedings in Case of Debtor’s Death before Initiating the Proceedings
For years, numerous interpretation difficulties have been caus...
The Problem of Deterring Extraterritorial WhiteCollar Crime
The Problem of Deterring Extraterritorial WhiteCollar Crime
Recent reports of egregious labor practices in China and Bangladesh have called public attention to the potential harms of foreign direct investment (FDI) in developing countries. ...


