Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Digital Enforcement Proceedings
View through CrossRef
One of the directions of digitalization is the introduction of digital enforcement proceedings. The paper analyzes the specifics of digital enforcement proceedings in relation to the previous stage of legal protection — judicial and extrajudicial procedures; the problems of eliminating legal and factual errors made at the stage of confirming the right and the compatibility of the mechanism of restitution with digital enforcement proceedings. The compatibility of the current rules of enforcement proceedings with summary digital enforcement proceedings and the risks of additional budget expenditures associated with an imperfect mechanism for a writ of restitution in digital enforcement proceedings are evaluated. There are three ways to enforce proceedings in which information technologies can be involved: simplified foreclosure on funds, foreclosure on other property, foreclosure on digital assets. It is proved that the summary enforcement proceedings applied to monetary penalties should exclude the possibility of recovery through banks and the employer. Based on the analysis of statistical data, it is demonstrated that most of the penalties will require a transition from digital enforcement proceedings to ordinary enforcement proceedings, therefore, a solution is required to regulate the issues of granting a term for voluntary execution, collection of enforcement fees, seizure of property, etc. In ordinary enforcement proceedings, the use of information technology should be aimed at solving the problem of detecting the property of a non-performing debtor; this requires legislative and technological solutions for cross-analysis of information, a single database of information on debt obligations, available funds, the property of a person and their expenses, combined with a base that provides the possibility of applying typical prohibitions, deprivation of typical benefits and privileges. It is concluded that in order to promote national jurisdiction in cross-border disputes, it is necessary to develop the direction of dispute resolution in relation to digital assets, and specific measures for this development are proposed.
Title: Digital Enforcement Proceedings
Description:
One of the directions of digitalization is the introduction of digital enforcement proceedings.
The paper analyzes the specifics of digital enforcement proceedings in relation to the previous stage of legal protection — judicial and extrajudicial procedures; the problems of eliminating legal and factual errors made at the stage of confirming the right and the compatibility of the mechanism of restitution with digital enforcement proceedings.
The compatibility of the current rules of enforcement proceedings with summary digital enforcement proceedings and the risks of additional budget expenditures associated with an imperfect mechanism for a writ of restitution in digital enforcement proceedings are evaluated.
There are three ways to enforce proceedings in which information technologies can be involved: simplified foreclosure on funds, foreclosure on other property, foreclosure on digital assets.
It is proved that the summary enforcement proceedings applied to monetary penalties should exclude the possibility of recovery through banks and the employer.
Based on the analysis of statistical data, it is demonstrated that most of the penalties will require a transition from digital enforcement proceedings to ordinary enforcement proceedings, therefore, a solution is required to regulate the issues of granting a term for voluntary execution, collection of enforcement fees, seizure of property, etc.
In ordinary enforcement proceedings, the use of information technology should be aimed at solving the problem of detecting the property of a non-performing debtor; this requires legislative and technological solutions for cross-analysis of information, a single database of information on debt obligations, available funds, the property of a person and their expenses, combined with a base that provides the possibility of applying typical prohibitions, deprivation of typical benefits and privileges.
It is concluded that in order to promote national jurisdiction in cross-border disputes, it is necessary to develop the direction of dispute resolution in relation to digital assets, and specific measures for this development are proposed.
Related Results
Access Denied
Access Denied
Introduction
As social-distancing mandates in response to COVID-19 restricted in-person data collection methods such as participant observation and interviews, researchers turned t...
Enforcement Systems – Differences and Similarities
Enforcement Systems – Differences and Similarities
Abstract
In modern civil procedural law, there are different organizational structures of national civil enforcement systems.
According to the p...
The influence of micro influencers and digital marketing on product purchasing decisions at tiktok shop in bengkulu city
The influence of micro influencers and digital marketing on product purchasing decisions at tiktok shop in bengkulu city
THE INFLUENCE OF MICRO-INFLUENCERS AND DIGITAL MARKETING ON PURCHASE DECISIONS OF TIKTOK SHOP CUSTOMERS IN BENGKULU CITY
Andhes Tiani Putri, Meylaty F
12Faculty Of Economic
E...
The methodology of law enforcement policy
The methodology of law enforcement policy
The subject of the paper is methodology of law enforcement policy, elements and relevance for law enforcement activity.The main aim of the paper is to confirm or disprove the hypot...
Punishing Polluters: Trends, Local Practice, and Influences, and Their Implications for Administrative Law Enforcement in China
Punishing Polluters: Trends, Local Practice, and Influences, and Their Implications for Administrative Law Enforcement in China
Scholars and politicians often complain about how weak administrative law enforcement is in China. To better understand the challenges in law enforcement, as well as variation in a...
Oczywista niecelowość wszczęcia postępowania egzekucyjnego w przypadku zgonu dłużnika przed wszczęciem tego postępowania
Oczywista niecelowość wszczęcia postępowania egzekucyjnego w przypadku zgonu dłużnika przed wszczęciem tego postępowania
Obvious Aimlessness of Initiating Enforcement Proceedings in Case of Debtor’s Death before Initiating the Proceedings
For years, numerous interpretation difficulties have been caus...
Ewolucja zakresu ograniczeń egzekucji sądowej a cel postępowania egzekucyjnego
Ewolucja zakresu ograniczeń egzekucji sądowej a cel postępowania egzekucyjnego
This study is devoted to the analysis of mutual relations between the evolution of the scope of limitations (restrictions) of judicial enforcement and the purpose of the enforcemen...
Informatyzacja administracyjnego postępowania egzekucyjnego i jej wpływ na skuteczność egzekucji administracyjnej
Informatyzacja administracyjnego postępowania egzekucyjnego i jej wpływ na skuteczność egzekucji administracyjnej
The solutions concerning the computerisation of administrative enforcement proceedings and administrative enforcement have been staggered by the Polish legislator and concern indiv...

