Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Seismic Mapping and Monitoring for Well Optimization
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Grane is one of the main producers in the Norwegian offshore sector. The reservoir consists of massive, predominantly fine to medium grained, moderately to well sorted, turbidite sandstones of the Heimdal Formation of Palaeocene age, enclosed in Lista Formation shales, at a depth of around 1700m below sea level.
The Grane reservoir has proven to be a difficult reservoir for ordinary seismic data. The PP imaging problem is partly caused by the structurally complex reservoir boundaries. For seismic imaging it is an additional problem that both top and base Heimdal have a class II AVO and that the underlying top Cretaceous chalks, close to base Heimdal, have a very high acoustic impedance. The broken up reservoir boundaries reduce the effective contrast seen by the seismic wave, and the class II AVO reduces the robustness of the stack. The top Cretaceous surface reveals a number of breaks that generate migration noise that contributes to the rather weak signal in the reservoir area. In addition, the top Cretaceous reflection interferes with the base Heimdal signal in some areas. Owing to these imaging problems mapping of small and moderate scale topography of the reservoir boundaries, faults and lithological heterogeneity, all of significant importance for drilling and well optimization, are a major challenge.
Prior to production there was no gas cap. Grane is produced with pressure support from gas injection and a gas cap is developing. This situation comprises a good starting point for seismic monitoring. The normal objectives such as mapping of the evolving gas cap, detection of possible barriers etc. are important. For Grane the additional information with respect to the structural shape of top reservoir is just as important.
The main aim of this paper is to show why and how we apply seabed/multicomponent, PS in particular, and seismic monitoring to solve the seismic mapping challenges on Grane.
Introduction
The Grane oil field is located in the Norwegian North Sea, about 200 km NW of Stavanger, Norway (Fig. 1) and contains heavy (19°API), high viscosity (12cP), biodegraded and undersaturated oil with no initial gas cap. The expected oil in place volumes amounts to about 209 Mill. SmÂ3 and the expected reserves are 120 Mill. SmÂ3. The field has been successfully producing since the start-up in September 2003, and the present production is more than 220,000 barrels of oil per day.
Figure 1. Location map of the Grane Field, Norwegian North Sea. (available in fullpaper)
The stratigraphic and structural setting of the Grane Field, in an E-W cross-section of the North Sea, is shown in Figure The reservoir consists of predominantly fine to medium grained, very friable, slightly quartz cemented massive sands (Fig. 3), and displays excellent reservoir properties with permeabilities commonly in the 5-10 Darcy range and with an average porosity of 33%.
Title: Seismic Mapping and Monitoring for Well Optimization
Description:
Abstract
Grane is one of the main producers in the Norwegian offshore sector.
The reservoir consists of massive, predominantly fine to medium grained, moderately to well sorted, turbidite sandstones of the Heimdal Formation of Palaeocene age, enclosed in Lista Formation shales, at a depth of around 1700m below sea level.
The Grane reservoir has proven to be a difficult reservoir for ordinary seismic data.
The PP imaging problem is partly caused by the structurally complex reservoir boundaries.
For seismic imaging it is an additional problem that both top and base Heimdal have a class II AVO and that the underlying top Cretaceous chalks, close to base Heimdal, have a very high acoustic impedance.
The broken up reservoir boundaries reduce the effective contrast seen by the seismic wave, and the class II AVO reduces the robustness of the stack.
The top Cretaceous surface reveals a number of breaks that generate migration noise that contributes to the rather weak signal in the reservoir area.
In addition, the top Cretaceous reflection interferes with the base Heimdal signal in some areas.
Owing to these imaging problems mapping of small and moderate scale topography of the reservoir boundaries, faults and lithological heterogeneity, all of significant importance for drilling and well optimization, are a major challenge.
Prior to production there was no gas cap.
Grane is produced with pressure support from gas injection and a gas cap is developing.
This situation comprises a good starting point for seismic monitoring.
The normal objectives such as mapping of the evolving gas cap, detection of possible barriers etc.
are important.
For Grane the additional information with respect to the structural shape of top reservoir is just as important.
The main aim of this paper is to show why and how we apply seabed/multicomponent, PS in particular, and seismic monitoring to solve the seismic mapping challenges on Grane.
Introduction
The Grane oil field is located in the Norwegian North Sea, about 200 km NW of Stavanger, Norway (Fig.
1) and contains heavy (19°API), high viscosity (12cP), biodegraded and undersaturated oil with no initial gas cap.
The expected oil in place volumes amounts to about 209 Mill.
SmÂ3 and the expected reserves are 120 Mill.
SmÂ3.
The field has been successfully producing since the start-up in September 2003, and the present production is more than 220,000 barrels of oil per day.
Figure 1.
Location map of the Grane Field, Norwegian North Sea.
(available in fullpaper)
The stratigraphic and structural setting of the Grane Field, in an E-W cross-section of the North Sea, is shown in Figure The reservoir consists of predominantly fine to medium grained, very friable, slightly quartz cemented massive sands (Fig.
3), and displays excellent reservoir properties with permeabilities commonly in the 5-10 Darcy range and with an average porosity of 33%.
Related Results
Seismic Frequency Enhancement for Mapping and Reservoir Characterization of Arab Formation: Case Study Onshore UAE
Seismic Frequency Enhancement for Mapping and Reservoir Characterization of Arab Formation: Case Study Onshore UAE
Abstract
Mapping and discrimination of Upper Jurassic Arab reservoirs (Arab A/B/C and D) in this 3D seismic onshore field of Abu Dhabi, is very sensitive to the seis...
4D Seismic on Gullfaks
4D Seismic on Gullfaks
SUMMARY
New technologies are rapidly emerging helping to obtain optimal drainage of large reservoirs. 4D seismic is such a reservoir monitoring technique. The phy...
Integrated Hydrocarbon Detection Based on Full Frequency Pre-Stack Seismic Inversion
Integrated Hydrocarbon Detection Based on Full Frequency Pre-Stack Seismic Inversion
Abstract
To improve the accuracy of hydrocarbon detection, seismic amplitude variation with offset (AVO), seismic amplitude variation with frequency (AVF), and direc...
Carbonate Seismic Facies Analysis in Reservoir Characterization: A Machine Learning Approach with Integration of Reservoir Mineralogy and Porosity
Carbonate Seismic Facies Analysis in Reservoir Characterization: A Machine Learning Approach with Integration of Reservoir Mineralogy and Porosity
Amid increasing interest in enhanced oil recovery and carbon geological sequestration programs, improved static reservoir lithofacies models are emerging as a requirement for well-...
Stochastic Rock Physics Inversion
Stochastic Rock Physics Inversion
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to introduce a stochastic seismic inversion algorithm based on Markov Chain Monte Carlo Simulation. The suggested inversion ...
Seismic Evaluation of Platform Cranes
Seismic Evaluation of Platform Cranes
ABSTRACT
Design of platforms in potentially seismic regions requires a thorough seismic analysis of both the platform and the equipment mounted to it. Typically, ...
APPLICATION OF SEISMOLOGY-BASED VOLCANO MONITORING TECHNIQUES AT WHAKAARI/WHITE ISLAND VOLCANO
APPLICATION OF SEISMOLOGY-BASED VOLCANO MONITORING TECHNIQUES AT WHAKAARI/WHITE ISLAND VOLCANO
Volcanoes present some of the most immediate and unpredictable natural hazards, particularly when they erupt without clear precursors. Phreatic and phreatomagmatic eruptions are es...
Future Directions of Multicomponent Seismic Methods in the Marine Environment
Future Directions of Multicomponent Seismic Methods in the Marine Environment
Abstract
Multicomponent seismic recording (4C) is becoming more common in several offshore seismic applications. Faithfully recording all Cartesian components of ...

