Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Characteristics and Origin of the Mantle Root Beneath the Murowa Diamond Mine: Implications for Craton and Diamond Formation
View through CrossRef
Abstract
The Murowa and Sese kimberlites erupted through the southern margin of the Zimbabwean craton. These kimberlites provide a unique sample of the continental lithospheric mantle in that area through their entrained mantle xenolith and xenocryst cargo. Mantle xenoliths have only been obtained from the Murowa locality so far and thus they form the focus of this review. Ultradepleted chromite-harzburgite and chromite-dunite rock units dominate the Murowa mantle xenolith inventory. No eclogite xenoliths have been found and eclogitic garnets are extremely scarce in the minerals analyzed from heavy mineral concentrate.
The very low bulk rock Al and Ca contents of the Murowa peridotites, along with their extreme Pt and Pd depletions, require extensive melt extraction—to in excess of 40% melting. At the same time, their high bulk rock Cr# (100☼ Cr/(Cr+Al)) indicates that melting took place at relatively low pressures (<<5 GPa). Such high bulk rock Cr#s (median = 0.60) are considerably higher than those of peridotites from the nearby Venetia mine (median = 0.33) and have only been found elsewhere in cratonic peridotites from the North Atlantic craton (median = 0.89). Similar elevated bulk Cr# values are matched by spinel peridotites derived from Phanerozoic collision zones as ophiolites. This similarity favors a model in which this part of the cratonic lithosphere was formed by the subduction of peridotite that had undergone multistage low-pressure melt extraction, likely in an Archean mantle wedge that underwent flux-melting within a subduction zone prior to lateral compression to form nascent cratonic lithospheric mantle.
Preliminary quantitative fitting of mantle geotherms derived from thermobarometry data is hampered by the scarcity of suitable clinopyroxene grains and is highly dependent on assumptions made regarding crustal heat production, especially in the lower crust. Nonetheless, at ~540 Ma, the time of kimberlite emplacement, the lithosphere beneath the southern edge of the Zimbabwe craton can be constrained to be approximately 200 km deep, slightly shallower than the 220-km depth estimated for lithosphere beneath the Venetia kimberlite, intruded through the Limpopo Complex. The presence of deep, ~200-km-thick lithospheric mantle beneath Murowa and Sese in early Cambrian times agrees with the minimum pressure estimates derived from Cr-Ca relationships in concentrate garnets. This estimate is close to that derived from surface-wave seismic studies and indicates that the thickness of the craton root beneath the southern Zimbabwe craton and the Limpopo Complex has not varied significantly in the last 500 m.y.
The ultradepleted nature of the Murowa peridotites, together with the scarcity of eclogite/pyroxenite components, indicates a different petrogenetic history for the lithospheric root beneath the southern Zimbabwe craton compared with the mantle roots beneath the Limpopo Complex (Venetia) and the Kaapvaal craton to the south. The very high fraction (73%; n = 150) of low-Ca, high-Cr harzburgitic “G-10” garnets in the mantle garnet concentrate population at Murowa, along with their Cr-Ca relations, is consistent with the high diamond grade (0.7 ct/metric ton). The likely metasomatic origin for G-10 garnets along with the abundance of ultradepleted chromite-bearing peridotites in the Murowa mantle xenolith suite indicates that this lithology, if present in the lithosphere in the diamond stability field, may be a critical starting component for a variety of diamond- formation events in cratonic lithosphere.
Title: Characteristics and Origin of the Mantle Root Beneath the Murowa Diamond Mine:
Implications for Craton and Diamond Formation
Description:
Abstract
The Murowa and Sese kimberlites erupted through the southern margin of the Zimbabwean craton.
These kimberlites provide a unique sample of the continental lithospheric mantle in that area through their entrained mantle xenolith and xenocryst cargo.
Mantle xenoliths have only been obtained from the Murowa locality so far and thus they form the focus of this review.
Ultradepleted chromite-harzburgite and chromite-dunite rock units dominate the Murowa mantle xenolith inventory.
No eclogite xenoliths have been found and eclogitic garnets are extremely scarce in the minerals analyzed from heavy mineral concentrate.
The very low bulk rock Al and Ca contents of the Murowa peridotites, along with their extreme Pt and Pd depletions, require extensive melt extraction—to in excess of 40% melting.
At the same time, their high bulk rock Cr# (100☼ Cr/(Cr+Al)) indicates that melting took place at relatively low pressures (<<5 GPa).
Such high bulk rock Cr#s (median = 0.
60) are considerably higher than those of peridotites from the nearby Venetia mine (median = 0.
33) and have only been found elsewhere in cratonic peridotites from the North Atlantic craton (median = 0.
89).
Similar elevated bulk Cr# values are matched by spinel peridotites derived from Phanerozoic collision zones as ophiolites.
This similarity favors a model in which this part of the cratonic lithosphere was formed by the subduction of peridotite that had undergone multistage low-pressure melt extraction, likely in an Archean mantle wedge that underwent flux-melting within a subduction zone prior to lateral compression to form nascent cratonic lithospheric mantle.
Preliminary quantitative fitting of mantle geotherms derived from thermobarometry data is hampered by the scarcity of suitable clinopyroxene grains and is highly dependent on assumptions made regarding crustal heat production, especially in the lower crust.
Nonetheless, at ~540 Ma, the time of kimberlite emplacement, the lithosphere beneath the southern edge of the Zimbabwe craton can be constrained to be approximately 200 km deep, slightly shallower than the 220-km depth estimated for lithosphere beneath the Venetia kimberlite, intruded through the Limpopo Complex.
The presence of deep, ~200-km-thick lithospheric mantle beneath Murowa and Sese in early Cambrian times agrees with the minimum pressure estimates derived from Cr-Ca relationships in concentrate garnets.
This estimate is close to that derived from surface-wave seismic studies and indicates that the thickness of the craton root beneath the southern Zimbabwe craton and the Limpopo Complex has not varied significantly in the last 500 m.
y.
The ultradepleted nature of the Murowa peridotites, together with the scarcity of eclogite/pyroxenite components, indicates a different petrogenetic history for the lithospheric root beneath the southern Zimbabwe craton compared with the mantle roots beneath the Limpopo Complex (Venetia) and the Kaapvaal craton to the south.
The very high fraction (73%; n = 150) of low-Ca, high-Cr harzburgitic “G-10” garnets in the mantle garnet concentrate population at Murowa, along with their Cr-Ca relations, is consistent with the high diamond grade (0.
7 ct/metric ton).
The likely metasomatic origin for G-10 garnets along with the abundance of ultradepleted chromite-bearing peridotites in the Murowa mantle xenolith suite indicates that this lithology, if present in the lithosphere in the diamond stability field, may be a critical starting component for a variety of diamond- formation events in cratonic lithosphere.
Related Results
A Study of Garnet and Chromian Spinel Xenocrysts from the Atri South Ultramafic Intrusion, Bundelkhand Craton, India
A Study of Garnet and Chromian Spinel Xenocrysts from the Atri South Ultramafic Intrusion, Bundelkhand Craton, India
Abstract
The Bundelkhand craton is one of five Archean cratons that make up the Indian shield, four of which have yielded diamond discoveries. The Bunder diamond pro...
A study of the mantle flow field and lithospheric deformation beneath the Kuril-Kamchatka subduction zone using seismic anisotropy
A study of the mantle flow field and lithospheric deformation beneath the Kuril-Kamchatka subduction zone using seismic anisotropy
We investigate the flow field and deformation in the mantle wedge and subslab mantle beneath the Kuril-Kamchatka subduction zone using seismological data from a recently deployed s...
Argyle Diamonds: How Subduction Along the Kimberley Craton Edge Generated the World’s Biggest Diamond Deposit
Argyle Diamonds: How Subduction Along the Kimberley Craton Edge Generated the World’s Biggest Diamond Deposit
Abstract
Based on the mineral inclusion content, diamonds from the Argyle mine, Western Australia, derive primarily (~90%) from eclogitic sources with a minor perido...
Deep Mantle Influence on the Cameroon Volcanic Line
Deep Mantle Influence on the Cameroon Volcanic Line
The origin of the Cameroon Volcanic Line (CVL), which is difficult to
explain with traditional plate tectonics and mantle convection models
because the volcanism does not display c...
Highly heterogeneous Late Mesozoic lithospheric mantle beneath the North China Craton: evidence from Sr–Nd–Pb isotopic systematics of mafic igneous rocks
Highly heterogeneous Late Mesozoic lithospheric mantle beneath the North China Craton: evidence from Sr–Nd–Pb isotopic systematics of mafic igneous rocks
The lithospheric mantle beneath the North China Craton changed dramatically in its geophysical and geochemical characteristics from Palaeozoic to Cenozoic times. This study uses sa...
On the measurement of Sdiff splitting caused by lowermost mantle anisotropy
On the measurement of Sdiff splitting caused by lowermost mantle anisotropy
Seismic anisotropy has been detected at many depths of the Earth,
including its upper layers, the lowermost mantle, and the inner core.
While upper mantle seismic anisotropy is rel...
Investigating the Viscosity Structure of Venus
Investigating the Viscosity Structure of Venus
The interior structure and geodynamic style of Venus are largely unknown. One of the most informative ways available to investigate the planet’s interior is through the joint analy...
Resolving the origin of lunar high-Ti basalts by petrologic experiments
Resolving the origin of lunar high-Ti basalts by petrologic experiments
The origin of the most primitive, picritic lunar basalts, sampled as pyroclastic glass beads in the lunar soils [1,2], remains poorly constrained. Especially the petrogenesis of hi...

