Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Feedbacks between a non-Newtonian upper mantle, mantle viscosity structure and mantle dynamics
View through CrossRef
SUMMARY
Previous studies have shown that a low viscosity upper mantle can impact the wavelength of mantle flow and the balance of plate driving to resisting forces. Those studies assumed that mantle viscosity is independent of mantle flow. We explore the potential that mantle flow is not only influenced by viscosity but can also feedback and alter mantle viscosity structure owing to a non-Newtonian upper-mantle rheology. Our results indicate that the average viscosity of the upper mantle, and viscosity variations within it, are affected by the depth to which a non-Newtonian rheology holds. Changes in the wavelength of mantle flow, that occur when upper-mantle viscosity drops below a critical value, alter flow velocities which, in turn, alter mantle viscosity. Those changes also affect flow profiles in the mantle and the degree to which mantle flow drives the motion of a plate analogue above it. Enhanced upper-mantle flow, due to an increasing degree of non-Newtonian behaviour, decreases the ratio of upper- to lower-mantle viscosity. Whole layer mantle convection is maintained but upper- and lower-mantle flow take on different dynamic forms: fast and concentrated upper-mantle flow; slow and diffuse lower-mantle flow. Collectively, mantle viscosity, mantle flow wavelengths, upper- to lower-mantle velocities and the degree to which the mantle can drive plate motions become connected to one another through coupled feedback loops. Under this view of mantle dynamics, depth-variable mantle viscosity is an emergent flow feature that both affects and is affected by the configuration of mantle and plate flow.
Title: Feedbacks between a non-Newtonian upper mantle, mantle viscosity structure and mantle dynamics
Description:
SUMMARY
Previous studies have shown that a low viscosity upper mantle can impact the wavelength of mantle flow and the balance of plate driving to resisting forces.
Those studies assumed that mantle viscosity is independent of mantle flow.
We explore the potential that mantle flow is not only influenced by viscosity but can also feedback and alter mantle viscosity structure owing to a non-Newtonian upper-mantle rheology.
Our results indicate that the average viscosity of the upper mantle, and viscosity variations within it, are affected by the depth to which a non-Newtonian rheology holds.
Changes in the wavelength of mantle flow, that occur when upper-mantle viscosity drops below a critical value, alter flow velocities which, in turn, alter mantle viscosity.
Those changes also affect flow profiles in the mantle and the degree to which mantle flow drives the motion of a plate analogue above it.
Enhanced upper-mantle flow, due to an increasing degree of non-Newtonian behaviour, decreases the ratio of upper- to lower-mantle viscosity.
Whole layer mantle convection is maintained but upper- and lower-mantle flow take on different dynamic forms: fast and concentrated upper-mantle flow; slow and diffuse lower-mantle flow.
Collectively, mantle viscosity, mantle flow wavelengths, upper- to lower-mantle velocities and the degree to which the mantle can drive plate motions become connected to one another through coupled feedback loops.
Under this view of mantle dynamics, depth-variable mantle viscosity is an emergent flow feature that both affects and is affected by the configuration of mantle and plate flow.
Related Results
Investigating the Viscosity Structure of Venus
Investigating the Viscosity Structure of Venus
The interior structure and geodynamic style of Venus are largely unknown. One of the most informative ways available to investigate the planet’s interior is through the joint analy...
Kinematics and flow patterns in deep mantle and upper mantle subduction models: Influence of the mantle depth and slab to mantle viscosity ratio
Kinematics and flow patterns in deep mantle and upper mantle subduction models: Influence of the mantle depth and slab to mantle viscosity ratio
Three‐dimensional fluid dynamic laboratory simulations are presented that investigate the subduction process in two mantle models, an upper mantle model and a deep mantle model, an...
Lithospheric Structure of the Hikurangi Subduction Margin
Lithospheric Structure of the Hikurangi Subduction Margin
<p><b>In this thesis, controlled-source seismic data acquired during two regional-scale experiments are analysed to determine the offshore lithospheric structure at the...
Lithospheric Structure of the Hikurangi Subduction Margin
Lithospheric Structure of the Hikurangi Subduction Margin
<p><b>In this thesis, controlled-source seismic data acquired during two regional-scale experiments are analysed to determine the offshore lithospheric structure at the...
Lithospheric Structure of the Hikurangi Subduction Margin
Lithospheric Structure of the Hikurangi Subduction Margin
<p><b>In this thesis, controlled-source seismic data acquired during two regional-scale experiments are analysed to determine the offshore lithospheric structure at the...
Importance of grain size-dependent viscosity for the early and present-day Earth
Importance of grain size-dependent viscosity for the early and present-day Earth
Grain size is one of the primary influencing factors for mantle viscosity. Larger grains lead to increased diffusion creep viscosity and vice-versa. Grain size is a thermally activ...
New Compositional Models for Calculating Viscosity of Crude Oils
New Compositional Models for Calculating Viscosity of Crude Oils
Abstract
Crude oil viscosity is an important physical property that controls and influences the flow of oil through porous media and pipelines. Hence, it is the b...
Internal Planetary Feedbacks, Mantle Dynamics, and Plate Tectonics
Internal Planetary Feedbacks, Mantle Dynamics, and Plate Tectonics
Isolating planetary feedbacks, and feedback analysis, are prevalent aspects of climate and Earth surface process science. An under appreciation of internal planet feedbacks, and fe...

