Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Customized Cost-Effective Cranioplasty for Large Asymmetrical Defects

View through CrossRef
Cranioplasty or cranial reconstruction is always a challenging procedure even for experienced surgeons. In this study, two different design techniques for customized cranial prostheses are assessed for cranial reconstruction. Mirror reconstruction is one of the commonly used reconstruction techniques that fails when cranial defects cross the midline of symmetry. Hence, there is a need for a design technique for the reconstruction of cranial defects irrespective of their location on the symmetrical plane. The anatomical reconstruction technique demonstrates its applicability for a wide spectrum of complex skull defects irrespective of the defective position in the anatomical structure. The paper outlines a methodological procedure involving a multi-disciplinary approach involving physicians and engineers in the design and reconstruction of customized cranial implants for asymmetrical skull defects. The proposed methodology is based on five foundation pillars including the multi-disciplinary approach, implant design process, additive-manufactured implant, implant fitting analysis, and cost and time analysis for the customized implant. The patient’s computed tomography scan data are utilized to model a customized cranial implant, which is then fabricated using electron beam melting technology. The dimensional validation of the designed and fabricated titanium implant based on the anatomical approach results in a precision of 0.6345 mm, thus indicating a better fit than the standard mirroring method. The results of fitting accuracy also reveal that the manufactured implant’s average deviation is very close to the planned reconstruction area with an error less than 1 mm, suggesting that the customized titanium implant fits the skull model quite precisely. The cost and time analysis reports that the cost for producing a customized cranial implant using electron beam melting technology is around USD 217.5 and the time taken to build is approximately 14 h and 27 min, which is low when compared to other studies. The cost and time analysis also demonstrates that the proposed design would be less burdensome to patients when compared to standard practice. Therefore, the new anatomical design process can be used effectively and efficiently to treat a number of diverse cranial abnormalities with the enhanced cranial implant design.
Title: Customized Cost-Effective Cranioplasty for Large Asymmetrical Defects
Description:
Cranioplasty or cranial reconstruction is always a challenging procedure even for experienced surgeons.
In this study, two different design techniques for customized cranial prostheses are assessed for cranial reconstruction.
Mirror reconstruction is one of the commonly used reconstruction techniques that fails when cranial defects cross the midline of symmetry.
Hence, there is a need for a design technique for the reconstruction of cranial defects irrespective of their location on the symmetrical plane.
The anatomical reconstruction technique demonstrates its applicability for a wide spectrum of complex skull defects irrespective of the defective position in the anatomical structure.
The paper outlines a methodological procedure involving a multi-disciplinary approach involving physicians and engineers in the design and reconstruction of customized cranial implants for asymmetrical skull defects.
The proposed methodology is based on five foundation pillars including the multi-disciplinary approach, implant design process, additive-manufactured implant, implant fitting analysis, and cost and time analysis for the customized implant.
The patient’s computed tomography scan data are utilized to model a customized cranial implant, which is then fabricated using electron beam melting technology.
The dimensional validation of the designed and fabricated titanium implant based on the anatomical approach results in a precision of 0.
6345 mm, thus indicating a better fit than the standard mirroring method.
The results of fitting accuracy also reveal that the manufactured implant’s average deviation is very close to the planned reconstruction area with an error less than 1 mm, suggesting that the customized titanium implant fits the skull model quite precisely.
The cost and time analysis reports that the cost for producing a customized cranial implant using electron beam melting technology is around USD 217.
5 and the time taken to build is approximately 14 h and 27 min, which is low when compared to other studies.
The cost and time analysis also demonstrates that the proposed design would be less burdensome to patients when compared to standard practice.
Therefore, the new anatomical design process can be used effectively and efficiently to treat a number of diverse cranial abnormalities with the enhanced cranial implant design.

Related Results

Cranioplasty in Acoustic Neuroma Surgery
Cranioplasty in Acoustic Neuroma Surgery
AbstractObjectives To measure the incidence of postoperative headaches after retrosigmoid resections of acoustic neuromas and to evaluate the impact of cranioplasty on the preventi...
Pediatric Cranioplasty Using Hydroxyapatite Cement: A Retrospective Review and Preliminary Computational Model
Pediatric Cranioplasty Using Hydroxyapatite Cement: A Retrospective Review and Preliminary Computational Model
<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Cranioplasty is a standard technique for skull defect repair. Restoration of cranial defects is imperative for brain protection ...
Outcomes of Cranioplasty after Craniectomy
Outcomes of Cranioplasty after Craniectomy
Objective:  Craniectomy is a widely used procedure in neurosurgery that results in more cranioplasties to repair skull defects. The complication rate after cranioplasties seems to ...
Effect of cranioplasty timing on the functional neurological outcome and postoperative complications
Effect of cranioplasty timing on the functional neurological outcome and postoperative complications
Background: The optimal timing for performing cranioplasty and its effect on functional outcome remains debatable. Multiple confounding factors may come into role; including the m...
Assessment of functional recovery after cranioplasty
Assessment of functional recovery after cranioplasty
Background: Cranioplasty is done after decompressive craniectomy surgeries either for cosmetic reasons or to afford protection against the development of the syndrome of the trephi...
Histological Processing of CAD/CAM Titanium Scaffold after Long-Term Failure in Cranioplasty
Histological Processing of CAD/CAM Titanium Scaffold after Long-Term Failure in Cranioplasty
Cranioplasty is a frequently performed procedure after craniectomy and includes several techniques with different materials. Due to high overall complication rates, alloplastic imp...

Back to Top