Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Questioning the Question Mark for Decompressive Hemicraniectomy: A Modified Scalp Incision to Enhance Cranioplasty Outcomes-the Smart-C Incision
View through CrossRef
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:
The traditional reverse question mark is the most used incision marking for decompressive craniectomy (DC) worldwide. Motivated by reasons spanning from scalp blood supply, wound dehiscence, surgical access, to scar results, several authors have proposed alternative incision techniques. None of the reported incision techniques considered anticipated cranioplasty planning at the time of DC. This study is a consecutive case series reporting our outcomes in patients who underwent DC using a new incision marking, the smart-C, and subsequently underwent cranioplasty at our institution.
METHODS:
Patients included were: (1) ≥18 years; (2) underwent DC using the smart-C incision marking; (3) followed by alloplastic cranioplasty with a 3-dimensional–customized cranial implant; and (4) had at least 6 months of follow-up.
RESULTS:
Eleven patients were included. Among them, 5 were male, and the mean age was 55.7 years. None of the patients developed intraoperative complications during the DC procedure nor did they experience scalp or wound complications during the interval between DC and reconstruction. All patients had a defect size equal to or greater than 16 × 12 cm, and the mean length of the cranioplasty surgery was 142 minutes. The mean follow-up period was 15.5 months, with 6 patients having a follow-up of 18 months or longer. None of the patients developed cranioplasty-related complications, either intraoperatively or during the entire follow-up period. There were zero wound infections, wound breakdowns, or other wound complications observed during follow-up. Every patient achieved a grade I cosmetic outcome at the last follow-up.
CONCLUSION:
The Smart-C incision was designed with the dual goal of ensuring a safe and effective DC while simultaneously planning smartly for future cranioplasty. In this cohort of 11 patients, we observed no cranioplasty-related complications during a reasonable follow-up period. The Smart-C incision has become the standard incision for DC in our institution.
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Title: Questioning the Question Mark for Decompressive Hemicraniectomy: A Modified Scalp Incision to Enhance Cranioplasty Outcomes-the Smart-C Incision
Description:
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:
The traditional reverse question mark is the most used incision marking for decompressive craniectomy (DC) worldwide.
Motivated by reasons spanning from scalp blood supply, wound dehiscence, surgical access, to scar results, several authors have proposed alternative incision techniques.
None of the reported incision techniques considered anticipated cranioplasty planning at the time of DC.
This study is a consecutive case series reporting our outcomes in patients who underwent DC using a new incision marking, the smart-C, and subsequently underwent cranioplasty at our institution.
METHODS:
Patients included were: (1) ≥18 years; (2) underwent DC using the smart-C incision marking; (3) followed by alloplastic cranioplasty with a 3-dimensional–customized cranial implant; and (4) had at least 6 months of follow-up.
RESULTS:
Eleven patients were included.
Among them, 5 were male, and the mean age was 55.
7 years.
None of the patients developed intraoperative complications during the DC procedure nor did they experience scalp or wound complications during the interval between DC and reconstruction.
All patients had a defect size equal to or greater than 16 × 12 cm, and the mean length of the cranioplasty surgery was 142 minutes.
The mean follow-up period was 15.
5 months, with 6 patients having a follow-up of 18 months or longer.
None of the patients developed cranioplasty-related complications, either intraoperatively or during the entire follow-up period.
There were zero wound infections, wound breakdowns, or other wound complications observed during follow-up.
Every patient achieved a grade I cosmetic outcome at the last follow-up.
CONCLUSION:
The Smart-C incision was designed with the dual goal of ensuring a safe and effective DC while simultaneously planning smartly for future cranioplasty.
In this cohort of 11 patients, we observed no cranioplasty-related complications during a reasonable follow-up period.
The Smart-C incision has become the standard incision for DC in our institution.
Related Results
Functional and aesthetic comparison of lower lip split incisions and modification of McGregor incision. (Preprint)
Functional and aesthetic comparison of lower lip split incisions and modification of McGregor incision. (Preprint)
BACKGROUND
The open mouth provided the basis for various surgical approaches to tumours of the oral cavity(1). If this access is inadequate it is generally ...
Bikini Incision Modification of the Direct Anterior Approach
Bikini Incision Modification of the Direct Anterior Approach
Background:
Although the direct anterior approach (DAA) represents an intermuscular and internervous approach to total hip arthroplasty (THA), it did not reach global a...
Decompressive hemicraniectomy for patients with malignant cerebral venous sinus thrombosis
Decompressive hemicraniectomy for patients with malignant cerebral venous sinus thrombosis
Background and objective:
Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) is a rare cause of stroke and may lead to the development of raised intracranial pressure due to edema, inf...
Early Versus Delayed Cranioplasty After Decompressive Craniectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
Early Versus Delayed Cranioplasty After Decompressive Craniectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
ABSTRACT
Introduction
Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is a surgical procedure that involves the removal of a portion of th...
Cranioplasty in Acoustic Neuroma Surgery
Cranioplasty in Acoustic Neuroma Surgery
AbstractObjectives To measure the incidence of postoperative headaches after retrosigmoid resections of acoustic neuromas and to evaluate the impact of cranioplasty on the preventi...
Sensitive Scalp: A Possible Association With the Use of Hair Conditioners
Sensitive Scalp: A Possible Association With the Use of Hair Conditioners
A sensitive scalp is defined by the occurrence of unpleasant sensations (tingling, burning, pain, pruritus) triggered by stimuli that should not cause such sensations. Environmenta...
Effect of cranioplasty timing on the functional neurological outcome and postoperative complications
Effect of cranioplasty timing on the functional neurological outcome and postoperative complications
Background:
The optimal timing for performing cranioplasty and its effect on functional outcome remains debatable. Multiple confounding factors may come into role; including the m...
Outcomes of Cranioplasty after Craniectomy
Outcomes of Cranioplasty after Craniectomy
Objective: Craniectomy is a widely used procedure in neurosurgery that results in more cranioplasties to repair skull defects. The complication rate after cranioplasties seems to ...

