Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Questioning the Question Mark for Decompressive Hemicraniectomy: A Modified Scalp Incision to Enhance Cranioplasty Outcomes-the Smart-C Incision

View through CrossRef
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The traditional reverse question mark is the most used incision marking for decompressive craniectomy (DC) worldwide. Motivated by reasons spanning from scalp blood supply, wound dehiscence, surgical access, to scar results, several authors have proposed alternative incision techniques. None of the reported incision techniques considered anticipated cranioplasty planning at the time of DC. This study is a consecutive case series reporting our outcomes in patients who underwent DC using a new incision marking, the smart-C, and subsequently underwent cranioplasty at our institution. METHODS: Patients included were: (1) ≥18 years; (2) underwent DC using the smart-C incision marking; (3) followed by alloplastic cranioplasty with a 3-dimensional–customized cranial implant; and (4) had at least 6 months of follow-up. RESULTS: Eleven patients were included. Among them, 5 were male, and the mean age was 55.7 years. None of the patients developed intraoperative complications during the DC procedure nor did they experience scalp or wound complications during the interval between DC and reconstruction. All patients had a defect size equal to or greater than 16 × 12 cm, and the mean length of the cranioplasty surgery was 142 minutes. The mean follow-up period was 15.5 months, with 6 patients having a follow-up of 18 months or longer. None of the patients developed cranioplasty-related complications, either intraoperatively or during the entire follow-up period. There were zero wound infections, wound breakdowns, or other wound complications observed during follow-up. Every patient achieved a grade I cosmetic outcome at the last follow-up. CONCLUSION: The Smart-C incision was designed with the dual goal of ensuring a safe and effective DC while simultaneously planning smartly for future cranioplasty. In this cohort of 11 patients, we observed no cranioplasty-related complications during a reasonable follow-up period. The Smart-C incision has become the standard incision for DC in our institution.
Title: Questioning the Question Mark for Decompressive Hemicraniectomy: A Modified Scalp Incision to Enhance Cranioplasty Outcomes-the Smart-C Incision
Description:
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The traditional reverse question mark is the most used incision marking for decompressive craniectomy (DC) worldwide.
Motivated by reasons spanning from scalp blood supply, wound dehiscence, surgical access, to scar results, several authors have proposed alternative incision techniques.
None of the reported incision techniques considered anticipated cranioplasty planning at the time of DC.
This study is a consecutive case series reporting our outcomes in patients who underwent DC using a new incision marking, the smart-C, and subsequently underwent cranioplasty at our institution.
METHODS: Patients included were: (1) ≥18 years; (2) underwent DC using the smart-C incision marking; (3) followed by alloplastic cranioplasty with a 3-dimensional–customized cranial implant; and (4) had at least 6 months of follow-up.
RESULTS: Eleven patients were included.
Among them, 5 were male, and the mean age was 55.
7 years.
None of the patients developed intraoperative complications during the DC procedure nor did they experience scalp or wound complications during the interval between DC and reconstruction.
All patients had a defect size equal to or greater than 16 × 12 cm, and the mean length of the cranioplasty surgery was 142 minutes.
The mean follow-up period was 15.
5 months, with 6 patients having a follow-up of 18 months or longer.
None of the patients developed cranioplasty-related complications, either intraoperatively or during the entire follow-up period.
There were zero wound infections, wound breakdowns, or other wound complications observed during follow-up.
Every patient achieved a grade I cosmetic outcome at the last follow-up.
CONCLUSION: The Smart-C incision was designed with the dual goal of ensuring a safe and effective DC while simultaneously planning smartly for future cranioplasty.
In this cohort of 11 patients, we observed no cranioplasty-related complications during a reasonable follow-up period.
The Smart-C incision has become the standard incision for DC in our institution.

Related Results

Bikini Incision Modification of the Direct Anterior Approach
Bikini Incision Modification of the Direct Anterior Approach
Background: Although the direct anterior approach (DAA) represents an intermuscular and internervous approach to total hip arthroplasty (THA), it did not reach global a...
Decompressive hemicraniectomy for patients with malignant cerebral venous sinus thrombosis
Decompressive hemicraniectomy for patients with malignant cerebral venous sinus thrombosis
Background and objective: Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) is a rare cause of stroke and may lead to the development of raised intracranial pressure due to edema, inf...
Cranioplasty in Acoustic Neuroma Surgery
Cranioplasty in Acoustic Neuroma Surgery
AbstractObjectives To measure the incidence of postoperative headaches after retrosigmoid resections of acoustic neuromas and to evaluate the impact of cranioplasty on the preventi...
Effect of cranioplasty timing on the functional neurological outcome and postoperative complications
Effect of cranioplasty timing on the functional neurological outcome and postoperative complications
Background: The optimal timing for performing cranioplasty and its effect on functional outcome remains debatable. Multiple confounding factors may come into role; including the m...
Outcomes of Cranioplasty after Craniectomy
Outcomes of Cranioplasty after Craniectomy
Objective:  Craniectomy is a widely used procedure in neurosurgery that results in more cranioplasties to repair skull defects. The complication rate after cranioplasties seems to ...
Sleeve cranioplasty: A novel endoscope-assisted cranioplasty technique after decompressive hemicraniectomy
Sleeve cranioplasty: A novel endoscope-assisted cranioplasty technique after decompressive hemicraniectomy
Background: Cranioplasty (CP) for large cranial defects after decompressive hemicraniectomy carries high complication risks due to extensive scalp dissection. H...
Pediatric Cranioplasty Using Hydroxyapatite Cement: A Retrospective Review and Preliminary Computational Model
Pediatric Cranioplasty Using Hydroxyapatite Cement: A Retrospective Review and Preliminary Computational Model
<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Cranioplasty is a standard technique for skull defect repair. Restoration of cranial defects is imperative for brain protection ...

Back to Top