Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Effectiveness of standard of care, vs. its combination with reflexology and sham reflexology on preoperative anxiety in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial
View through CrossRef
Background
Preoperative anxiety is common. To date, no randomized controlled trial has examined the effectiveness of reflexology in reducing preoperative anxiety in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Methods
A randomized, single blinded, interventional trial was conducted with 300 patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy, comparing the following three groups: controls receiving standard-of-care (SoC) only (group 1); intervention group receiving reflexology and SoC (group 2); and a group receiving sham reflexology and SoC (group 3). The primary outcome was the mean difference between the three groups in visual analog scale for anxiety (VAS-A). The secondary outcome was a similar analysis confined to patients experiencing baseline moderate-to-high anxiety. In all groups, level of preoperative anxiety was evaluated at entry and exit from the holding room area (HRA). The evaluation was carried out using the VAS-A questionnaire. The study was registered at
clinicaltrials.gov
(NCT01733771).
Results
101 patients were randomly assigned to the reflexology group, 99 to the sham reflexology arm, and 100 received SoC alone. In all groups, SoC included anxiolytics in 25% of patients received about 2 h before the operation. Baseline anxiety (at entry to HRA) was similar in all groups, averaging 5.3. Between-group analysis comparing the reflexology and sham groups detected 0.8 point difference on 0–10 VAS scale in favor of the reflexology group (
p
= 0.022). Subgroup analysis of patients with moderate to high level of anxiety (VAS-A>4) at baseline (consisting of 75% of study participants), indicated 1.3 points difference (
p
= 0.023).
Conclusions
The study findings suggest that reflexology treatments have a small, yet significant advantage over sham reflexology and over standard-of-care in reducing preoperative anxiety, in patients with moderate-to-high levels of anxiety.
Clinical trial registration
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01733771?tab=results
, Identifier: NCT01733771.
Title: Effectiveness of standard of care, vs. its combination with reflexology and sham reflexology on preoperative anxiety in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial
Description:
Background
Preoperative anxiety is common.
To date, no randomized controlled trial has examined the effectiveness of reflexology in reducing preoperative anxiety in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Methods
A randomized, single blinded, interventional trial was conducted with 300 patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy, comparing the following three groups: controls receiving standard-of-care (SoC) only (group 1); intervention group receiving reflexology and SoC (group 2); and a group receiving sham reflexology and SoC (group 3).
The primary outcome was the mean difference between the three groups in visual analog scale for anxiety (VAS-A).
The secondary outcome was a similar analysis confined to patients experiencing baseline moderate-to-high anxiety.
In all groups, level of preoperative anxiety was evaluated at entry and exit from the holding room area (HRA).
The evaluation was carried out using the VAS-A questionnaire.
The study was registered at
clinicaltrials.
gov
(NCT01733771).
Results
101 patients were randomly assigned to the reflexology group, 99 to the sham reflexology arm, and 100 received SoC alone.
In all groups, SoC included anxiolytics in 25% of patients received about 2 h before the operation.
Baseline anxiety (at entry to HRA) was similar in all groups, averaging 5.
3.
Between-group analysis comparing the reflexology and sham groups detected 0.
8 point difference on 0–10 VAS scale in favor of the reflexology group (
p
= 0.
022).
Subgroup analysis of patients with moderate to high level of anxiety (VAS-A>4) at baseline (consisting of 75% of study participants), indicated 1.
3 points difference (
p
= 0.
023).
Conclusions
The study findings suggest that reflexology treatments have a small, yet significant advantage over sham reflexology and over standard-of-care in reducing preoperative anxiety, in patients with moderate-to-high levels of anxiety.
Clinical trial registration
https://clinicaltrials.
gov/study/NCT01733771?tab=results
, Identifier: NCT01733771.
Related Results
Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Ovarian Cancer
Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Ovarian Cancer
Abstract
Introduction
Although the efficacy of PD-L1 blockade has been evaluated in analyses that combine pharmacologically distinct antibodies, the specific efficacy and safety of...
The difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a narrative review
The difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a narrative review
Abstract
Background/purpose
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is one of the most commonly performed general surgical procedures. Difficult laparoscopi...
LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY;
LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY;
Objectives: Toevaluate the outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy as compared with open cholecystectomy in compensated cirrhotic patients. Study Design: Prospective randomized stu...
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract
Introduction
Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...
Prevalence of Iatrogenic Bile Duct Injury Following Open and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Treatment Outcomes
Prevalence of Iatrogenic Bile Duct Injury Following Open and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Treatment Outcomes
Background and Aim:Iatrogenic bile duct injuries (IBDI) continue to be a difficult diagnostic and therapeutic problem. The prevalence of iatrogenic IBDI increased with the laparosc...
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SINGLE INCISION LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY AND CONVENTIONAL LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SINGLE INCISION LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY AND CONVENTIONAL LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY
Background
Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery, is an alternative to conventional multi-port laparoscopic surgeries with the aim to reduce complications associated with multiple i...
Frequency of Common Bile Duct Injury in Open Cholecystectomy versus Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Frequency of Common Bile Duct Injury in Open Cholecystectomy versus Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has replaced open cholecystectomy as the standard treatment for cholelithiasis. However, it is associated with a higher incidence of common...
Pembrolizumab and Sarcoma: A meta-analysis
Pembrolizumab and Sarcoma: A meta-analysis
Abstract
Introduction: Pembrolizumab is a monoclonal antibody that promotes antitumor immunity. This study presents a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety...

