Javascript must be enabled to continue!
“Non-delisting”: risk warning and research and development expenditure
View through CrossRef
Purpose
This paper investigates the relationship between stock risk supervision mechanisms and corporate innovation decisions, using China’s non-delisting risk warning system as a case study. Specifically, it empirically examines how the implementation of “non-delisting” risk warnings in a particular city influences the R&D expenditures of local enterprises, providing insights into the underlying mechanisms and implications.
Design/methodology/approach
Drawing on risk tolerance theory, which explores the interplay between capital markets and innovation, this study analyzes the spillover effects of “non-delisting” risk warnings on R&D investments by firms within the same city. The sample comprises data from A-share listed companies on the China Stock Exchange from 2008 to 2021. The OLS regression method is employed as the primary analytical tool, supplemented by robustness checks using Tobit regression, firm and city fixed effects, dynamic panel regression, instrumental variable methods, and propensity score matching to address potential endogeneity concerns.
Findings
The results indicate that the introduction of “non-delisting” risk warnings in a city significantly reduces the R&D expenditures of other enterprises within the same region. Mechanism tests reveal that warnings triggered by illegal fund appropriation by controlling shareholders or related parties primarily exert a “deterrence effect” on local firms. In sub-samples with a higher propensity for similar violations, the negative externalities of these warnings on R&D investments are more pronounced. Conversely, warnings issued due to temporary performance declines primarily induce a “credit risk contagion effect” among local enterprises, with stronger negative impacts observed in sub-samples facing higher financing constraints. Heterogeneity tests further demonstrate that higher external audit quality, robust internal controls, greater local government intervention, and advanced urban financial development mitigate the negative externalities of “non-delisting” risk warnings on R&D expenditures. Additionally, intense industry competition and favorable bank-enterprise relationships help alleviate these adverse effects. An analysis of R&D innovation strategies reveals that firms respond to such warnings by reducing expensed R&D investments and non-inventive patent outputs to manage potential capital market pressures and financing constraints.
Research limitations/implications
There is still insufficient direct evidence regarding the specific pathways and mechanisms of these “deterrent effects” and “credit risk contagion effects”. For instance, there is a lack of evidence regarding the psychological changes and direct decisions of enterprise management in the face of “non-delisting” risk warnings from peer enterprises, as well as whether there are significant changes in the risk assessment activities of banks and other creditors when facing other enterprises in the same city as those with “non-delisting” risk warnings. In the future, such direct evidence can be obtained through typical case studies or field research via channels such as in-depth interviews or questionnaire surveys.
Practical implications
The findings offer valuable insights for emerging market economies, particularly China, in designing effective stock risk supervision systems during the early stages of capital market development. They also provide guidance for companies in adapting their strategies and management practices to navigate the evolving regulatory environment.
Originality/value
This study contributes to the literature by exploring the spillover effects of stock risk warnings and the intricate relationship between capital markets and corporate innovation. It extends existing research by identifying distinct mechanisms—deterrence and credit risk contagion effects—through which risk warnings influence R&D investments, while also highlighting the moderating roles of governance, financial development, and industry dynamics.
Title: “Non-delisting”: risk warning and research and development expenditure
Description:
Purpose
This paper investigates the relationship between stock risk supervision mechanisms and corporate innovation decisions, using China’s non-delisting risk warning system as a case study.
Specifically, it empirically examines how the implementation of “non-delisting” risk warnings in a particular city influences the R&D expenditures of local enterprises, providing insights into the underlying mechanisms and implications.
Design/methodology/approach
Drawing on risk tolerance theory, which explores the interplay between capital markets and innovation, this study analyzes the spillover effects of “non-delisting” risk warnings on R&D investments by firms within the same city.
The sample comprises data from A-share listed companies on the China Stock Exchange from 2008 to 2021.
The OLS regression method is employed as the primary analytical tool, supplemented by robustness checks using Tobit regression, firm and city fixed effects, dynamic panel regression, instrumental variable methods, and propensity score matching to address potential endogeneity concerns.
Findings
The results indicate that the introduction of “non-delisting” risk warnings in a city significantly reduces the R&D expenditures of other enterprises within the same region.
Mechanism tests reveal that warnings triggered by illegal fund appropriation by controlling shareholders or related parties primarily exert a “deterrence effect” on local firms.
In sub-samples with a higher propensity for similar violations, the negative externalities of these warnings on R&D investments are more pronounced.
Conversely, warnings issued due to temporary performance declines primarily induce a “credit risk contagion effect” among local enterprises, with stronger negative impacts observed in sub-samples facing higher financing constraints.
Heterogeneity tests further demonstrate that higher external audit quality, robust internal controls, greater local government intervention, and advanced urban financial development mitigate the negative externalities of “non-delisting” risk warnings on R&D expenditures.
Additionally, intense industry competition and favorable bank-enterprise relationships help alleviate these adverse effects.
An analysis of R&D innovation strategies reveals that firms respond to such warnings by reducing expensed R&D investments and non-inventive patent outputs to manage potential capital market pressures and financing constraints.
Research limitations/implications
There is still insufficient direct evidence regarding the specific pathways and mechanisms of these “deterrent effects” and “credit risk contagion effects”.
For instance, there is a lack of evidence regarding the psychological changes and direct decisions of enterprise management in the face of “non-delisting” risk warnings from peer enterprises, as well as whether there are significant changes in the risk assessment activities of banks and other creditors when facing other enterprises in the same city as those with “non-delisting” risk warnings.
In the future, such direct evidence can be obtained through typical case studies or field research via channels such as in-depth interviews or questionnaire surveys.
Practical implications
The findings offer valuable insights for emerging market economies, particularly China, in designing effective stock risk supervision systems during the early stages of capital market development.
They also provide guidance for companies in adapting their strategies and management practices to navigate the evolving regulatory environment.
Originality/value
This study contributes to the literature by exploring the spillover effects of stock risk warnings and the intricate relationship between capital markets and corporate innovation.
It extends existing research by identifying distinct mechanisms—deterrence and credit risk contagion effects—through which risk warnings influence R&D investments, while also highlighting the moderating roles of governance, financial development, and industry dynamics.
Related Results
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI INVESTOR PADA PERUSAHAAN VOLUNTARY DELISTING DI PASAR MODAL
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI INVESTOR PADA PERUSAHAAN VOLUNTARY DELISTING DI PASAR MODAL
Pasar modal dipandang sebagai salah satu sarana yang efektif untuk mempercepat pembangunan suatu negara. Hal ini dimungkinkan karena pasar modal merupakan wahana yang dapat menggal...
Survival Analysis of Corporate Delisting Risk in the Korean Stock Market
Survival Analysis of Corporate Delisting Risk in the Korean Stock Market
This paper applies survival analysis to model corporate delisting risk among Korean Exchange (KRX) listed companies over the period 2000-2023. Using a sample of 365 firms drawn fro...
The Dynamics Behind Delisting: An Insight into the Indian Context
The Dynamics Behind Delisting: An Insight into the Indian Context
The study explores the multifaceted reasons for the delisting of companies from the Indian stock exchange (Bombay Stock Exchange), with a particular focus on voluntary delisting tr...
The significance of National Early Warning Score for predicting prognosis and evaluating conditions of patients in resuscitation room
The significance of National Early Warning Score for predicting prognosis and evaluating conditions of patients in resuscitation room
Background:For critical patients in resuscitation room, the early prediction of potential risk and rapid evaluation of disease progression would help physicians with timely treatme...
The Determinants of the Delisting Phenomenon in Pakistan
The Determinants of the Delisting Phenomenon in Pakistan
The listing gap is a major threat to the Pakistan Stock Exchange. This study compares corporations that voluntarily left the Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX) between 2010 and 2023 and...
Product reformulation in non-alcoholic beverages and foods after the implementation of front-of-pack warning labels in Mexico
Product reformulation in non-alcoholic beverages and foods after the implementation of front-of-pack warning labels in Mexico
Background
In late March 2020, the Mexican government announced an updated norm to include front-of-pack warning labels for packaged foods and non-alcoholic beverages. Warning labe...
Five years of EDuMaP for the performance analysis of territorial landslide early warning systems
Five years of EDuMaP for the performance analysis of territorial landslide early warning systems
<p>Landslide early warning systems (LEWS) can be classified in either territorial or local systems (Piciullo et al., 2018). Systems addressing single landslides, at s...
Non-Recommended Publishing Lists: Strategies for Detecting Deceitful Journals
Non-Recommended Publishing Lists: Strategies for Detecting Deceitful Journals
Abstract
The rapid growth of open access publishing (OAP) has significantly improved the accessibility and dissemination of scientific knowledge. However, this expansion has also c...

